Search

Myristoylation of most neuronal calcium sensor proteins, a group of EF-hand calcium-binding proteins mainly expressed in neuronal tissue, can have a strong impact on protein dynamics and functional properties. Intracellular oscillations of the free Ca(2+) concentration can trigger conformational changes in Ca(2+) sensors. The position and possible movements of the myristoyl group in the photoreceptor cell-specific Ca(2+) sensor GCAP2 are not well-defined but appear to be different from those of the highly homologous cognate GCAP1. We designed and applied a new group of diaminoterephthalate-derived fluorescent probes to label GCAP2 at a covalently attached 12-azido-dodecanoic acid (a myristoyl substitute) and at cysteine residues in critical positions. Fluorescence emission of dye-labeled GCAP2 decreased when going from low (10(-9) M) to high [Ca(2+)] (10(-3) M), reaching a half-maximal effect of fluorescence emission at 0.44 ± 0.07 μM. The modified acyl group can therefore monitor changes in the protein conformation during binding and dissociation of Ca(2+) in the physiological range of free [Ca(2+)]. However, fluorescence quenching studies showed that the dye-acyl chain was shielded from the quencher by an adjacent polypeptide region. Further probing three cysteine positions (C35, C111, and C131) by dye labeling revealed that all positions were also sensitive to a change in [Ca(2+)], but only one (C131) was sensitive to a change in [Mg(2+)]. We suggest a scenario during illumination of the photoreceptor cell in which Ca(2+) dissociates first from low and medium affinity binding sites. These steps are sensed by dyes in cysteines at positions 35 and 111. Release of Ca(2+) from high affinity sites is sensed by regions adjacent to the dye-labeled fatty acid and involves the critical conformational change leading to activating guanylate cyclase.

Retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase (RetGC) in the outer segments of vertebrate photoreceptors is controlled by guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs), responding to light-dependent changes of the intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations. We present evidence that a different RetGC binding protein, retinal degeneration 3 protein (RD3), is a high-affinity allosteric modulator of the cyclase which inhibits RetGC activity at submicromolar concentrations. It suppresses the basal activity of RetGC in the absence of GCAPs in a noncompetitive manner, and it inhibits the GCAP-stimulated RetGC at low intracellular Ca(2+) levels. RD3 opposes the allosteric activation of the cyclase by GCAP but does not significantly change Ca(2+) sensitivity of the GCAP-dependent regulation. We have tested a number of mutations in RD3 implicated in human retinal degenerative disorders and have found that several mutations prevent the stable expression of RD3 in HEK293 cells and decrease the affinity of RD3 for RetGC1. The RD3 mutant lacking the carboxy-terminal half of the protein and associated with Leber congenital amaurosis type 12 (LCA12) is unable to suppress the activity of the RetGC1/GCAP complex. Furthermore, the inhibitory activity of the G57V mutant implicated in cone-rod degeneration is strongly reduced. Our results suggest that inhibition of RetGC by RD3 may be utilized by photoreceptors to block RetGC activity during its maturation and/or incorporation into the photoreceptor outer segment rather than participate in dynamic regulation of the cyclase by Ca(2+) and GCAPs.

Mouse photoreceptor function and survival critically depend on Ca(2+)-regulated retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase (RetGC), comprised of two isozymes, RetGC1 and RetGC2. We characterized the content, catalytic constants, and regulation of native RetGC1 and RetGC2 isozymes using mice lacking guanylyl cyclase activating proteins GCAP1 and GCAP2 and deficient for either GUCY2F or GUCY2E genes, respectively. We found that the characteristics of both native RetGC isozymes were considerably different from other reported estimates made for mammalian RetGCs: the content of RetGC1 per mouse rod outer segments (ROS) was at least 3-fold lower, the molar ratio (RetGC2:RetGC1) 6-fold higher, and the catalytic constants of both GCAP-activated isozymes between 12- and 19-fold higher than previously measured in bovine ROS. The native RetGC isozymes had different basal activity and were accelerated 5-28-fold at physiological concentrations of GCAPs. RetGC2 alone was capable of contributing as much as 135-165 μM cGMP s(-1) or almost 23-28% to the maximal cGMP synthesis rate in mouse ROS. At the maximal level of activation by GCAP, this isozyme alone could provide a significantly high rate of cGMP synthesis compared to what is expected for normal recovery of a mouse rod, and this can help explain some of the unresolved paradoxes of rod physiology. GCAP-activated native RetGC1 and RetGC2 were less sensitive to inhibition by Ca(2+) in the presence of GCAP1 (EC(50Ca) ∼132-139 nM) than GCAP2 (EC(50Ca) ∼50-59 nM), thus arguing that Ca(2+) sensor properties of GCAP in a functional RetGC/GCAP complex are defined not by a particular target isozyme but the intrinsic properties of GCAPs themselves.

Protein N-myristoylation occurs by a covalent attachment of a C14:0 fatty acid to the N-terminal Gly residue. This reaction is catalyzed by a N-myristoyltransferase that uses myristoyl-coenzyme A as substrate. But proteins in the retina also undergo heterogeneous N-acylation with C14:2, C14:1, and C12:0 fatty acids. The basis and the role of this retina-specific phenomenon are poorly understood. We studied guanylate cyclase-activating protein 1 (GCAP1) as an example of retina-specific heterogeneously N-acylated protein. The types and the abundance of fatty acids bound to bovine retinal GCAP1 were C14:2, 37.0%; C14:0, 32.4%; C14:1, 22.3%; and C12:0, 8.3% as quantified by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry. We also devised a method for N-acylating proteins in vitro and used it to modify GCAP1 with acyl moieties of different lengths. Analysis of these GCAPs both confirmed that N-terminal acylation of GCAP1 is critical for its high activity and proper Ca(2+)-dependent response and revealed comparable functionality for GCAP1 with acyl moieties of various lengths. We also tested the hypothesis that retinal heterogeneous N-acylation results from retinal enrichment of unusual N-myristoyltransferase substrates. Thus, acyl-coenzyme A esters were purified from both bovine retina and brain and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry. Substantial differences in acyl-coenzyme A profiles between the retina and brain were detected. Importantly, the ratios of uncommon N-acylation substrates--C14:2- and C14:1-coenyzme A to C14:0-coenzyme A--were higher in the retina than in the brain. Thus, our results suggest that heterogeneous N-acylation, responsible for expansion of retinal proteome, reflects the unique character of retinal lipid metabolism. Additionally, we propose a new hypothesis explaining the physiological relevance of elevated retinal ratios of C14:2- and C14:1-coenzyme A to C14:0-coenzyme A.

We have recently shown that activation of retinal guanylate cyclase (retGC) by GC-activating proteins (GCAPs) is much stronger than that previously reported and that preincubation of photoreceptor outer segment homogenates with ATP or its analogue, adenylyl imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP), is required for the strong activation [Yamazaki, A., Yu, H., Yamazaki, M., Honkawa, H., Matsuura, I., Usukura, J., and Yamazaki, R. K. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 33150-33160]. Here we show that illuminated rhodopsin is essential for development of the AMP-PNP incubation effect. This was demonstrated by illumination of dark homogenates and treatments of illuminated homogenates with 11-cis-retinal and hydroxylamine prior to the AMP-PNP incubation and by measurement of the GCAP2 concentration required for 50% activation. We also found that the AMP-PNP incubation effect was not altered by addition of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate), indicating that transducin activation is not required. It is concluded that illuminated rhodopsin is involved in retGC activation in two ways: to initiate the ATP incubation effect for preparation of retGC activation as shown here and to reduce the Ca 2+ concentrations through cGMP phosphodiesterase activation as already known. These two signal pathways may be activated in a parallel and perhaps proportional manner and finally converge for strong activation of retGC by Ca 2+ -free GCAPs.

The rod outer segment membrane guanylate cyclase type 1 (ROS-GC1), originally identified in the photoreceptor outer segments, is a member of the subfamily of Ca(2+)-modulated membrane guanylate cyclases. In phototransduction, its activity is tightly regulated by its two Ca(2+)-sensor protein parts, GCAP1 and GCAP2. This study maps the GCAP2-modulatory site in ROS-GC1 through the use of multiple techniques involving surface plasmon resonance binding studies with soluble ROS-GC1 constructs, coimmunoprecipitation, functional reconstitution experiments with deletion mutants, and peptide competition assays. The findings show that the sequence motif of the core GCAP2-modulatory site is Y965-N981 of ROS-GC1. The site is distinct from the GCAP1-modulatory site. It, however, partially overlaps with the S100B-regulatory site. This indicates that the Y965-N981 motif tightly controls the Ca(2+)-dependent specificity of ROS-GC1. Identification of the site demonstrates an intriguing topographical feature of ROS-GC1. This is that the GCAP2 module transmits the Ca(2+) signals to the catalytic domain from its C-terminal side and the GCAP1 module from the distant N-terminal side.

Recent evidence indicates the presence of a novel alpha(2D/A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2D/A)-AR) linked membrane guanylate cyclase signal transduction system in the pineal gland. This system operates via a Ca(2+)-driven rod outer segment membrane guanylate cyclase (ROS-GC). In the present study, this transduction system has been characterized via molecular, immunohistochemical, and biochemical approaches. The two main components of the system are ROS-GC1 and its Ca(2+) regulator, S100B. Both components coexist in pinealocytes where the signaling component alpha(2D/A)-AR also resides. The presence of ROS-GC2 was not detected in the pineal gland. Thus, transduction components involved in processing alpha(2D/A)-AR-mediated signals are Ca(2+), S100B, and ROS-GC1. During this investigation, an intriguing observation was made. In certain pinealocytes, ROS-GC1 coexisted with its other Ca(2+) modulator, guanylate cyclase activating protein type 1 (GCAP1). In these pinealocytes, S100B was not present. The other GCAP protein, GCAP2, which is also a known modulator of ROS-GC in photoreceptors, was not present in the pineal gland. The results establish the identity of an alpha(2D/A)-AR-linked ROS-GC1 transduction system in pinealocytes. Furthermore, the findings show that ROS-GC1, in a separate subpopulation of pinealocytes, is associated with an opposite Ca(2+) signaling pathway, which is similar to phototransduction in retina. Thus, like photoreceptors, pinealocytes sense both positive and negative Ca(2+) signals, where ROS-GC1 plays a pivotal role; however, unlike photoreceptors, the pinealocyte is devoid of the ROS-GC2/GCAP2 signal transduction system.

Regulation of cAMP and cGMP production is a fundamental step in a broad range of signal transduction systems, including phototransduction. To identify regions within photoreceptor guanylyl cyclase 1 (GC1) that interact with GC-activating proteins (GCAPs), we synthesized the intracellular fragment of GC1, residues 491-1110, as a set of 15 amino acid long, partially overlapping peptides on the surface of individual pins arranged in a microtiter plate format. This pin assay identified 8 peptides derived from different regions of the GC1 intracellular domain that bind GCAPs. Peptide variants containing these sequences were synthesized as free peptides and tested for their ability to inhibit GC1 stimulation by GCAPs. A free peptide,968GTFRMRHMPEVPVRIRIG, from the catalytic domain of GC1 was the strongest inhibitor of GCAP1/GCAP2-mediated activation. In native GC1, this polypeptide fragment is likely to form a loop between alpha-helix 3 and beta-strand 4. When this region in GC1 was replaced by the corresponding sequence of GCAP-insensitive GC type A, GCAPs did not stimulate the GC1 mutant. The corresponding loops in related adenylyl cyclase (AC) are involved in the activating and inhibiting interactions with Gs alpha and Gi alpha, respectively. Thus, despite interacting with different activating proteins, both AC and GC activity may be modulated through their respective regions within catalytic domains.

ROS-GC1 is the original member of the subfamily of membrane guanylate cyclases with two Ca2+ switches, which have been defined as CRM1 and CRM2. These are separately located within the intracellular domain of the cyclase. CRM1 switches on the enzyme at nanomolar concentrations of Ca2+ and is linked with phototransduction; the other stimulates at micromolar Ca2+ concentrations and is predicted to be linked with retinal synaptic activity. Ca2+ acts indirectly via Ca2+-binding proteins, GCAP1 and CD-GCAP. GCAP1 is a modulator of the CRM1 switch, and CD-GCAP turns on the CRM2 switch. A Leber's congenital amaurosis, termed LCA1, involves F514S point mutation in ROS-GC1. The present study shows that the mutation severely damages its intrinsic cyclase activity and inactivates its CRM1 switch but does not affect the CRM2 switch. In addition, on the basis of the established modulatory features of ROS-GC1, it is predicted that, in two other forms of LCA1 involving deletion of nt 460C or 693C, there is a frameshift in ROS-GC1 gene, which results in the nonexpression of the cyclase. For the first time, the findings define the linkage of distinct molecular forms of LCA to ROS-GC1 in precise biochemical terms; they also explain the reasons for the insufficient production of cyclic GMP in photoreceptors to sustain phototransduction, which ultimately leads to the degeneration of the photoreceptors.

Calcium-dependent guanylate cyclase activator protein (CD-GCAP) is a low-molecular-weight retinal calcium-binding protein which activates rod outer segment guanylate cyclase (ROS-GC) in a calcium-dependent manner. This investigation was undertaken to determine the protein's structure and identity. Partial amino acid sequencing (72% of the protein), mass spectral analysis, cloning, and immunological studies revealed that CD-GCAP is identical to S100beta, another low-molecular-weight calcium-binding protein whose structure was known. We had shown earlier that the latter protein, which is usually called S100b (S100betabeta or dimer of S100beta), also activates ROS-GC but that the Vmax of activated cyclase was about 50% lower than when stimulated by CD-GCAP. S100b also required about 15 times more calcium (3.2 x 10(-)5 vs 1.5 x 10(-)6 M) for half-maximal stimulation of cyclase. To investigate the possibility that CD-GCAP is a post-translationally modified form of S100b, both proteins were treated with 1 M hydroxylamine which is known to deacylate proteins. After the treatment, CD-GCAP did not activate cyclase while S100b activation remained unaffected suggesting that CD-GCAP could not be a modified form of S100b. Hydroxylamine also broke down CD-GCAP into smaller fragments while leaving S100b intact. It therefore appeared that in spite of identical primary structures, the conformations of the two proteins were different. We then investigated the possibility that the purification procedures of the two proteins, which were quite different, could have contributed to such conformational differences: CD-GCAP purification included a step of heating at 75 degrees C in 5 mM Ca, while S100b purification included zinc affinity chromatography. To test the influence of these treatments on the properties of the proteins, CD-GCAP was subjected to zinc affinity chromatography and purified as S100b (CD-GCAP-->S100b) and S100b was heated in Ca and purified as CD-GCAP (S100b-->CD-GCAP). Cyclase activation, calcium-sensitivity, and hydroxylamine-lability measurements revealed that CD-GCAP-->S100b is identical to S100b and that S100b-->CD-GCAP is identical to CD-GCAP. Taken together the results demonstrate that CD-GCAP and S100b are one and the same protein and that their functional differences are due to different interconvertible conformational states.

In rod and cone photoreceptor cells, activation of particulate guanylate cyclase (retGC1) is mediated by a Ca2+-binding protein termed GCAP1, that detects changes in [Ca2+]free. In this study, we show that N-acylated GCAP1 restored Ca2+ sensitivity of native and recombinant photoreceptor retGC1. ATP increased the affinity of retGC1 for GCAP1 and accelerated catalysis. Using peptides derived from the GCAP1 sequence, we found that at least three regions, encompassing the N-terminus, the EF-1 motif, and the EF-3 motif, were likely involved in the interaction with retGC1. Mutation of 2Gly to Ala (GCAP1-G2A), which abolished myristoylation and a 25 amino acid truncation at the N-terminus (delta25-GCAP1) reduced retGC1-stimulating activity dramatically, while deletion of 10 amino acids (delta10-GCAP1) reduced the specific activity by only approximately 60% and modified the Ca2+ sensitivity. At 10(-6) M [Ca2+]free, in conditions that inactivated native GCAP1, retGC1 showed significant activity in the presence of delta10-GCAP1. Native and all three mutant forms of GCAP1 had similar affinities for Ca2+ as demonstrated by gel filtration and the changes in tryptophan fluorescence. All mutants bound to ROS membranes in a Ca2+-independent manner, except delta25-GCAP1, which was mostly soluble. These findings suggest that the N-terminal region is important in tethering of GCAP1 to the ROS membranes.

Bovine photoreceptor guanylate cyclase (ROS-GC) consists of a single transmembrane polypeptide chain with extracellular and intracellular domains. In contrast to non-photoreceptor guanylate cyclases (GCs) which are activated by hormone peptides, ROS-GC is modulated in low Ca2+ by calmodulin-like Ca(2+)-binding proteins termed GCAPs (guanylate cyclase-activating proteins). In this communication we show that, like the native system, ROS-GC expressed in COS cells is activated 4-6-fold by recombinant GCAP1 at 10 nM Ca2+ and that the reconstituted system is inhibited at physiological levels of Ca2+ (1 microM). A mutant ROS-GC in which the extracellular domain was deleted was stimulated by GCAP1 indistinguishable from native ROS-GC indicating that this domain is not involved in Ca2+ modulation. Deletion of the intracellular kinase-like domain diminished the stimulation by GCAP1, indicating that this domain is at least in part involved in Ca2+ modulation. Replacement of the catalytic domain in a non-photoreceptor GC by the catalytic domain of ROS-GC yielded a chimeric GC that was sensitive to ANF/ATP and to a lesser extent to GCAP1. The results establish that GCAP1 acts at an intracellular domain, suggesting a mechanism of photoreceptor GC stimulation fundamentally distinct from hormone peptide stimulation of other cyclase receptors.

The retinal guanylylcyclases ROS-GC 1 and 2 are regulated via the intracellular site by guanylylcyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs). The mechanisms of how GCAPs activate their target proteins remain elusive as exclusively structures of nonactivating calcium-bound GCAP-1 and -2 are available. In this work, we apply a combination of chemical cross-linking with amine-reactive cross-linkers and photoaffinity labeling followed by a mass spectrometric analysis of the created cross-linked products to study the interaction between N-terminally myristoylated GCAP-2 and a peptide derived from the catalytic domain of full-length ROS-GC 1. In our studies, only a few cross-linked products were obtained for calcium-bound GCAP-2, pointing to a well-defined structure of the GCAP-2-GC peptide complex. A much larger number of cross-links were detected in the absence of calcium, indicating a high flexibility of calcium-free GCAP-2 in the complex with the GC peptide. On the basis of the distance constraints imposed by the cross-links, we were able to create a structural model of the calcium-loaded complex between myristoylated GCAP-2 and the GC peptide.

We explored the possibility that, in the regulation of an effector enzyme by a Ca(2+)-sensor protein, the actual Ca(2+) sensitivity of the effector enzyme can be determined not only by the affinity of the Ca(2+)-sensor protein for Ca(2+) but also by the relative affinities of its Ca(2+)-bound versus Ca(2+)-free form for the effector enzyme. As a model, we used Ca(2+)-sensitive activation of photoreceptor guanylyl cyclase (RetGC-1) by guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs). A substitution Arg(838)Ser in RetGC-1 found in human patients with cone-rod dystrophy is known to shift the Ca(2+) sensitivity of RetGC-1 regulation by GCAP-1 to a higher Ca(2+) range. We find that at physiological concentrations of Mg(2+) this mutation increases the free Ca(2+) concentration required for half-maximal inhibition of the cyclase from 0.27 to 0.61 microM. Similar to rod outer segment cyclase, Ca(2+) sensitivity of recombinant RetGC-1 is strongly affected by Mg(2+), but the shift in Ca(2+) sensitivity for the R838S mutant relative to the wild type is Mg(2+)-independent. We determined the apparent affinity of the wild-type and the mutant RetGC-1 for both Ca(2+)-bound and Ca(2+)-free GCAP-1 and found that the net shift in Ca(2+) sensitivity of the R838S RetGC-1 observed in vitro can arise predominantly from the change in the affinity of the mutant cyclase for the Ca(2+)-free versus Ca(2+)-loaded GCAP-1. Our findings confirm that the dynamic range for RetGC regulation by Ca(2+)/GCAP is determined by both the affinity of GCAP for Ca(2+) and relative affinities of the effector enzyme for the Ca(2+)-free versus Ca(2+)-loaded GCAP.

In visual transduction, guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) activate the membrane-bound guanylate cyclase 1 (ROS-GC1) to synthesize cGMP under conditions of low cytoplasmic [Ca2+]free. GCAPs are neuronal Ca2+-binding proteins with three functional EF-hands and a consensus site for N-terminal myristoylation. GCAP-1 and GCAP-2 regulated ROS-GC1 activities differently. The myristoyl group in GCAP-1 had a strong influence on the Ca2+-dependent regulation of ROS-GC1 (shift in IC50). In contrast, myristoylation of GCAP-2 did not change the cyclase activation profile (no shift in IC50). Thus, the myristoyl group controlled the Ca2+-sensitivity of GCAP-1, but not that of GCAP-2. The myristoyl group restricted the accessibility of one cysteine in GCAP-1 and GCAP-2 observed by measuring the time-dependent thiol reactivity of cysteines. This shielding effect was not relieved when Ca2+ was buffered by EGTA. We applied surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy to monitor the Ca2+-dependent binding of myristoylated and nonmyristoylated GCAP-1 and GCAP-2 to immobilized phospholipid membranes. None of the GCAPs exhibited a Ca2+-myristoyl switch as observed for recoverin. Thus, the myristoyl group controls the Ca2+-sensitivity of GCAP-1 (not that of GCAP-2) by an allosteric mechanism, but this control step does not involve a myristoyl switch.

The mechanism by which the individual odor signals are translated into the perception of smell in the brain is unknown. The signal processing occurs in the olfactory system which has three major components: olfactory neuroepithelium, olfactory bulb, and olfactory cortex. The neuroepithelial layer is composed of ciliated sensory neurons interspersed among supportive cells. The sensory neurons are the sites of odor transduction, a process that converts the odor signal into an electrical signal. The electrical signal is subsequently received by the neurons of the olfactory bulb, which process the signal and then relay it to the olfactory cortex in the brain. Apart from information about certain biochemical steps of odor transduction, there is almost no knowledge about the means by which the olfactory bulb and cortical neurons process this information. Through biochemical, functional, and immunohistochemical approaches, this study shows the presence of a Ca(2+)-modulated membrane guanylate cyclase (mGC) transduction system in the bulb portion of the olfactory system. The mGC is ROS-GC1. This is coexpressed with its specific modulator, guanylate cyclase activating protein type 1 (GCAP1), in the mitral cells. Thus, a new facet of the Ca(2+)-modulated GCAP1--ROS-GC1 signaling system, which, until now, was believed to be unique to phototransduction, has been revealed. The findings suggest a novel role for this system in the polarization and depolarization phenomena of mitral cells and also contradict the existing belief that no mGC besides GC-D exists in the olfactory neurons.

RetGC-1 and RetGC-2 are photoreceptor membrane guanylyl cyclases that are regulated by the Ca2+-binding protein, GCAP-2. We used a protease protection assay to localize regions of the intracellular domains of RetGCs important for the interaction with GCAP-2 and found that GCAP-2 reduces the access of trypsin to a site in the kinase homology domain (KHD) of RetGC-1. The protective effect of GCAP-2 is independent of Ca2+. We also found that RetGC-2 and GCAP-2 interact cooperatively with high affinity, but RetGC-1 and GCAP-2 interact noncooperatively with low affinity. By analyzing RetGC-1/RetGC-2 chimeras we demonstrated that the affinity and cooperativity of the interaction with GCAP-2 is dictated by the structure of the KHD. These findings suggest that GCAP-2 interacts constituitively with the KHDs of RetGC-1 and RetGC-2 and that cGMP synthesis is controlled by Ca2+-dependent conformational changes in the RetGC/GCAP complex.

Guanylyl cyclase-activating peptide II (GCAP-II), an endogenous ligand of particulate guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C), is processed from the precursor protein and circulates in human blood. GCAP-II consists of 24 amino acid residues and contains two disulfide bridges. The correct disulfide paring of GCAP-II is an absolute requirement for its biological activity. This study shows that the folding of the peptide from the reduced form yields a peptide with the native disulfide paring as a minor product and with non-native ones as major products, regardless of the presence or absence of reduced and oxidized glutathione. The results suggest that GCAP-II does not possess sufficient information to permit the adoption of the native conformation and to effectively form the correct disulfide pairing and, as a result, that GCAP-II is correctly folded by assistance of a factor(s) such as an intra- or intermolecular chaperone. We studied whether a peptide in the pro-leader sequence of the precursor protein (proGCAP-II) contains sufficient information to facilitate the folding of GCAP-II. For this purpose, we prepared proGCAP-II in Escherichia coli by a recombinant technique and examined the disulfide-coupled folding of proGCAP-II from the reduced form. proGCAP-II was quantitatively recovered with the correctly folded structure from the reduced form both in the presence and in the absence of reduced and oxidized glutathione. The protein contains only disulfide linkages at the same positions as the mature form of proGCAP-II, GCAP-II, and the biologically active isomer of GCAP-II in the molecule. These results provide evidence that the propeptide of proGCAP-II is a critical factor in the formation of the correct disulfide paring in the folding of the protein.

Guanylate cyclase-activating protein 1 (GCAP1), a photoreceptor-specific Ca 2+ -binding protein, activates retinal guanylate cyclase 1 (GC1) during the recovery phase of phototransduction. In contrast to other Ca 2+ -binding proteins from the calmodulin superfamily, the Ca 2+ -free form of GCAP1 stimulates the effector enzyme. In this study, we analyzed the Ca 2+ -dependent changes in GCAP1 structure by limited proteolysis and mutagenesis in order to understand the mechanism of Ca 2+ -sensitive modulation of GC1 activity. The change from a Ca 2+ -bound to a Ca 2+ -free form of GCAP1 increased susceptibility of Ca 2+ -free GCAP1 to proteolysis by trypsin. Sequencing data revealed that in the Ca 2+ -bound form, only the N-terminus (myristoylated Gly 2 -Lys 9 ) and C-terminus (171-205 fragment) of GCAP1 are removed by trypsin, while in the Ca 2+ -free form, GCAP1 is readily degraded to small fragments. Successive inactivation of each of the functional EF loops by site-directed mutagenesis showed that only EF3 and EF4 contribute to a Ca 2+ -dependent inactivation of GCAP1. GCAP1(E 75 D,E 111 D,E 155 D) mutant did not bind Ca 2+ and stimulated GC1 in a (Ca 2+ )-independent manner. GCAP1 and GCAP2, but not S-100‚, a high (Ca 2+ )free activator of GC1, competed with the triple mutant at high (Ca 2+ )free, inhibiting GC1 with similar IC50's. These competition results are consistent with comparable affinities between GC1 and GCAPs. Our data suggest that GCAP1 undergoes major conformational changes during Ca 2+ binding and that EF3 and EF4 motifs are responsible for changes in the GCAP1 structure that converts this protein from the activator to the inhibitor of GC1.

In photoreceptor outer segments, particulate guanylyl cyclase (RetGC) is stimulated at low intracellular Ca2+ concentrations by guanylyl cyclase activating protein (GCAP), a Ca2+-sensitive activator, to resynthesize light-depleted cGMP. In washed outer segment membranes, we find that GCAP-stimulable RetGC is rapidly inactivated at physiological temperatures (30-37 degrees C). Under the same conditions, RetGC remains competent for stimulation by S-100 protein preparations or Mn2+/Triton X-100, indicating that the cyclase catalytic domain remains functional. GCAPs and adenine nucleotides protect against inactivation. Protection by GCAPs is independent of Ca2+ concentration, suggesting that there is a Ca2+-independent interaction between GCAP and RetGC. Protection by ATP (EC50 = 150 microM) is not due to phosphorylation, since the nonhydrolyzable analogue adenylyl imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP) protects equally well. In addition to their roles in protection, ATP and AMP-PNP also slowly stimulate cyclase activity. In parallel with the functional change in RetGC at physiological temperatures, we also observe a structural change. A 62-kDa intracellular fragment of RetGC-1 becomes more sensitive to cleavage by trypsin after preincubation at 30 degrees C unless ATP, AMP-PNP, or GCAP is present. Adenine nucleotides and GCAPs thus protect RetGC structurally, as well as functionally.