Search

The structure of poly(dA).poly(dT) in aqueous solution has been studied by using 1H two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect (2D NOE) spectroscopy and relaxation rate measurements on the imino and nonexchangeable protons. The assignments of the 1H resonances are determined from the observed cross-relaxation patterns in the 2D NOE experiments. The cross-peak intensities together with the measured relaxation rates show that the purine and pyrimidine strands in poly(dA).poly(dT) are equivalent in aqueous solution. The results are consistent with a right-handed B-form helix where the sugars on both strands are in the C2'-endo/anti configuration. These observations are inconsistent with a proposed heteronomous structure for poly(dA).poly(dT) [Arnott, S., Chandrasekaran, R., Hall, I. H., & Puigjaner, L. C. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 4141-4155]. The measured relaxation rates also show that poly(dA).poly(dT) has fast, large-amplitude local internal motions (+/- 20-25 degrees) in solution and that the amplitudes of the base and sugar motions are similar. The motion of the bases in poly(dA).poly(dT) is also similar to that previously reported for poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) and poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) [Assa-Munt, N., Granot, J., Behling, R. W., & Kearns, D. R. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 944-955; Mirau, P. A., Behling, R. W., & Kearns, D. R. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6200-6211].

Proton NMR relaxation measurements are used to compare the molecular dynamics of 60 base pair duplexes of B- and Z-form poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC). The relaxation rates of the exchangeable guanine imino protons (Gim) in H2O and in 90% D2O show that below 20 degrees C spin-lattice relaxation is exclusively from proton-proton magnetic dipolar interactions while proton-nitrogen interactions contribute about 30% to the spin-spin relaxation. The observation that the spin-lattice relaxation is nonexponential and that the initial spin-lattice relaxation rate of the Gim, G-H8 and C-H6 protons depends on the selectivity of the exciting pulse shows that spin-diffusion dominates the spin-lattice relaxation. The relaxation rates of the Gim, C-H5, and C-H6 in B- and Z-form poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) cannot be explained by assuming the DNA behaves as a rigid rod. The data can be fit by assuming large-amplitude out of plane motions (+/- 30-40 degrees, tau = 1-100 ns) and fast, large-amplitude local torsional motions (+/- 25-90 degrees, tau = 0.1-1.5 ns) in addition to collective torsional motions. The results for the B and Z forms show that the rapid internal motions are similar and large in both conformations although backbone motions are slightly slower, or of lower amplitude, in Z DNA. At high temperatures (greater than 60 degrees C), imino proton exchange with solvent dominates the spin-lattice relaxation of B-form poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC), but in the Z form no exchange contribution (less than 2 s-1) is observed at temperatures as high as 85 degrees C. Conformational fluctuations that expose the imino protons to the solvent are strikingly different in the B and Z forms. The results obtained here are compared with those previously reported for poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT).

Measurements on the thymine imino proton relaxation rates have been used to study various structural and dynamic properties of 53 +/- 15 base pair long poly(dA-dT). Below 10 degrees C, the relaxation is dominated by dipolar magnetic interactions. At 1 degrees C the relaxation of the transverse magnetization is exponential (R2 = 124 s-1), but the relaxation of longitudinal magnetization is highly nonexponential due to spin-diffusion effects (initial decay rate constant of 28 s-1 and a slower rate of approximately 2.5 s-1 after equilibration of spin polarization). Neither a rigid-rod model nor simple wormlike motions can account for the observed low-temperature relaxation behavior. However, when localized internal motions of the base pairs (three-state jump model) are allowed for, a good fit of the experimental data is obtained by using a correlation time for internal motion of 7 X 10(-10) s and an angular displacement of the bases of +/- 32 degrees relative to the helix axis. The observed R2/R1 ratio for the thymine imino proton yields a value of 1.14 +/- 0.08 A for the imino proton nitrogen distance. Nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) measurements establish that the base pairing in poly(dA-dT) is Watson-Crick in solution and not Hoogsteen. Exchange of the T-imino protons with H2O dominates the longitudinal relaxation above 28 degrees C (activation energy of 17 +/- 2 kcal and an exchange rate of 5 +/- 2 s-1 at 300 K). Similar values have been reported for the A X T base pairs in DNA restriction fragments and for A X U base pairs in poly(A) X poly(U). These observations can be explained by a model in which exchange of T-imino protons occurs as a result of a single base pair opening, with a rate that is approximately independent of nearest-neighbor sequences and DNA length. Our observations appear to be inconsistent with a soliton model of proton exchange.

Structural constraints derived from proton NMR relaxation measurements on poly(dA).poly(dT) in the form of interproton separations and orientation have been combined with molecular mechanics and annealed molecular dynamics calculations to derive a model for the solution-state structure of this molecule. Three different possible starting configurations, including the standard A and B forms of Arnott and Hukins [Arnott, S., & Hukins, D. W. L. (1972) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 47, 1506-1509] and the heteronomous (H) structure [Arnott, S., Chandrasekaran, R., Hall, I. H., & Puigjaner, L. C. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 4141-4155], were examined. Both the B- and H-DNA structures converged to the same B-like structure (approximately C2'-endo conformation on both the A and T sugars, glycosidic bond torsional angle of 63-73 degrees) with the same energies and average helical parameters that gave good fits of the NMR relaxation rates. This model also accounts for the experimental observation [Behling, R. W., & Kearns, D. R. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 3335-3346] that the AH2 proton interacts more strongly with the H1' sugar proton on the T strand than on the A strand. Although the helix repeat angle (39 degrees) is larger than that for standard B-DNA (36 degrees), this does not result in a significantly smaller minor groove, as monitored by the interstrand P-P separation. Calculations starting with the A-DNA structure lead to a very high energy structure that gave a poorer fit of the NMR data.