Search

Baclofen and γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) exert γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor agonism and have therapeutic utility but possess different pharmacological activities. We examined whether separate groups of mice could be trained to discriminate either baclofen or GHB, and the contribution of GABAB receptors to discriminative stimulus effects. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate either baclofen (3.2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) or GHB (178 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) from saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule. The GABAB antagonist 3-aminopropyl(diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid (CGP 35348) was used to pharmacologically assess GABAB receptor involvement. The selectivity of the resulting discriminations was assessed with the opioid agonist morphine and the benzodiazepine midazolam. In baclofen-trained mice, both baclofen and GHB were readily discriminated. Baclofen produced a maximum of 86% baclofen-appropriate responding. CGP 35348 (320 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a 4.7-fold rightward shift in the dose-effect function. GHB produced a maximum of 85.8% baclofen-appropriate responding. In GHB-trained mice, both GHB and baclofen were readily discriminated. In GHB-trained mice, GHB produced a maximum of 85.3% drug-appropriate responding; CGP 35348 (320 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a 1.8-fold rightward shift in the GHB discrimination dose-effect function. Baclofen produced up to 70.0% GHB-appropriate responding. CGP 35348 (320 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly antagonized baclofen discrimination and baclofen produced up to 37% GHB-appropriate responding up to doses that disrupted operant responding. Morphine did not produce substitution for either baclofen or GHB. Midazolam produced partial substitution for both. GHB and baclofen discrimination assays in mice provide a useful approach for examining different receptor types mediating the effects of these two drugs.

Sigma-1 receptors (σ1Rs) are structurally unique intracellular proteins that function as chaperones. σ1Rs translocate from the mitochondria-associated membrane to other subcellular compartments, and can influence a host of targets, including ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors, lipids, and other signaling proteins. Drugs binding to σRs can induce or block the actions of σRs. Studies indicate that stimulant self-administration induces the reinforcing effects of σR agonists, because of dopamine transporter actions. Once established, the reinforcing effects of σR agonists are independent of dopaminergic mechanisms traditionally thought to be critical to the reinforcing effects of stimulants. Self-administered doses of σR agonists do not increase dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens shell, a transmitter and brain region considered important for the reinforcing effects of abused drugs. However, self-administration of σR agonists is blocked by σR antagonists. Several effects of stimulants have been blocked by σR antagonists, including the reinforcing effects, assessed by a place-conditioning procedure. However, the self-administration of stimulants is largely unaffected by σR antagonists, indicating fundamental differences in the mechanisms underlying these two procedures used to assess the reinforcing effects. When σR antagonists are administered in combination with dopamine uptake inhibitors, an effective and specific blockade of stimulant self-administration is obtained. Actions of stimulant drugs related to their abuse induce unique changes in σR activity and the changes induced potentially create redundant and, once established, independent reinforcement pathways. Concomitant targeting of both dopaminergic pathways and σR proteins produces a selective antagonism of stimulant self-administration, suggesting new avenues for combination chemotherapies to specifically combat stimulant abuse.

Previous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of selective σ-receptor (σR) agonists [1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG), PRE-084] as reinforcers in rats trained to self-administer cocaine. Similar to cocaine, these drugs increased nucleus accumbens shell dopamine levels, and effects of DTG, but not PRE-084, on dopamine seemed to be mediated by σRs. In addition, σR antagonists blocked self-administration of σR agonists, but were inactive against reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cocaine. Thus, pharmacologically distinct mechanisms likely underlie the reinforcing and neurochemical effects of σR agonists and cocaine. This study further examined the cocaine-like effects of σR agonists in rats trained to discriminate injections of cocaine from saline to assess the similarity of their subjective effects. Standard dopamine-uptake inhibitors (WIN 35,428, methylphenidate), but neither σR agonist (PRE-084, DTG), produced full cocaine-like discriminative-stimulus effects. The lack of effects of σR agonists was obtained regardless of route of administration (intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, or intravenous) or pretreatment time (5 or 30 min before sessions). The present results demonstrate differences in the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and selective σR agonists, indicating that an overlap of subjective effects is not necessary for σR agonist self-administration. The previously found differences in neurochemical effects of cocaine and σR agonists may contribute to their different subjective effects.