1. Contamination vs. harm-relevant outcome expectancies and covariation bias in spider phobia
- Author
-
de Jong, Peter J. and Peters, Madelon L.
- Subjects
Set (Psychology) -- Research ,Phobias -- Research ,Phobias -- Psychological aspects ,Psychology and mental health - Abstract
There is increasing evidence that spiders are not feared because of harmful outcome expectancies but because of disgust and contamination-relevant outcome expectancies. This study investigated the relative strength of contamination- and harm-relevant UCS expectancies and covariation bias in spider phobia. High (n = 25) and low (n = 24) spider fearful individuals saw a series of slides comprising spiders, pitbulls, maggots, and rabbits. Slides were randomly paired with either a harm-relevant outcome (electrical shock), a contamination-related outcome (drinking of a distasting fluid), or nothing. Spider fearful individuals displayed a contamination-relevant UCS expectancy bias associated with spiders, whereas controls displayed a harm-relevant expectancy bias. There was no evidence for a (differential) postexperimental covariation bias; thus the biased expectancies were not robust against refutation. The present findings add to the evidence that contamination ideation is critically involved in spider phobia. Keywords: Disgust; Expectancy bias; Covariation bias; Phobia
- Published
- 2007