Search

To compete for parental food deliveries nestling birds have evolved diverse behaviors such as begging displays and sibling aggression. Testosterone has been suggested to be an important mechanism orchestrating such competitive behaviors, but evidence is scarce and often indirect. Siblicidal species provide an interesting case in which a clear dominance hierarchy is established and the dominant chicks lethally attack siblings. We experimentally elevated testosterone in chicks of a facultatively siblicidal species, the black-legged kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla, and showed that testosterone-treated chicks were more aggressive toward their sibling than were control chicks. In such facultatively siblicidal species, chicks normally exhibit intense aggression only when threatened by starvation. Indeed, we found that chicks in relatively poorer condition were more aggressive than were chicks in better condition, even among testosterone-treated chicks, suggesting the action of an additional signal modulating aggression. Relatively larger siblings were also more aggressive than were relatively smaller siblings, confirming the importance of size advantage in determining dominance hierarchies within the brood. In addition, testosterone increased aggression toward a simulated predator, indicating that in kittiwakes testosterone can increase aggression in contexts other than siblicide. Testosterone promoted aggression-mediated dominance, which increased begging although testosterone treatment did not have a significant separate effect on begging. Therefore, testosterone production in the kittiwake and most likely other siblicidal species seems an important fitness mediator already early in life, outside the sexual context and not only manifesting itself in aggressive behavior but also in dominance-mediated effects on food solicitation displays toward parents.

To determine whether solicitation by blue-footed booby chicks accurately encodes their need for food, we independently manipulated the body condition and recent food ingestion of singleton chicks and recorded three measures of begging. Variations in the three measures of begging covaried only partially, but in general, chicks begged more intensely when they were in poor body condition and also when suffering recent food deprivation. Effects of body condition and recent food deprivation on begging were broadly additive, although deprived chicks in poor condition failed to beg more intensely than those in good condition. Protracted short-term deprivation may create such a high level of need that the body condition component of need becomes temporarily unimportant. Parents more frequently fed chicks that begged more intensely, chicks in poor condition, and chicks suffering food deprivation. Deprived chicks in poor condition received more food than deprived chicks in normal condition even though they did not beg more intensely, possibly because parents responded not only to current begging but also to begging earlier in the day, or to other cues to body condition. These results support the hypothesis that begging of boobies represents honest signaling of need.

We examined the dynamics and avoidance of mate guarding, by males and females, in the blue-footed booby, in which the two social mates are usually simultaneously present on the territory but each of them is unmonitored by the other for one-quarter of its time. Both sexes were promiscuous and liable to switch mates. Cuckolded individuals did not increase their overall presence on the territory, but in response to the extra-pair (EP) courtships of their mates, both sexes doubled their rate of intra-pair (IP) courtship and sometimes showed aggression. The male or female's presence depressed the social mate's EP activity, but intra-pair courtship had no such effect, tending even to propitiate that EP activity. Similarly, when females responded to their social mates' EP courtship with approach or aggression, disruption of EP activity was short-lived. Promiscuous females modified their diurnal pattern of attendance, as if attempting to sidestep monitoring by their mates, but cuckolded males matched the modification. Both sexes tended to perform their EP activities at a distance when their mates were present, possibly to evade monitoring or disruption by their mates. Male and female boobies cannot monitor their mates continuously, they do little to facultatively adjust their presence on territory to the risk of infidelity, and their immediate responses to overt infidelity have only the briefest impact; but the information they acquire while monitoring their mates may be critical to constraining their mates' infidelity and also to calibrating their own reproductive investment.