Search

Your search keyword '"Schulte-Mecklenbeck A"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Schulte-Mecklenbeck A" Journal behavior research methods
11 results on '"Schulte-Mecklenbeck A"'

1. Retraction Note: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Author

Holmqvist, Kenneth, Örbom, Saga Lee, Hooge, Ignace T. C., Niehorster, Diederick C., Alexander, Robert G., Andersson, Richard, Benjamins, Jeroen S., Blignaut, Pieter, Brouwer, Anne-Marie, Chuang, Lewis L., Dalrymple, Kirsten A., Drieghe, Denis, Dunn, Matt J., Ettinger, Ulrich, Fiedler, Susann, Foulsham, Tom, van der Geest, Jos N., Hansen, Dan Witzner, Hutton, Samuel B., Kasneci, Enkelejda, Kingstone, Alan, Knox, Paul C., Kok, Ellen M., Lee, Helena, Lee, Joy Yeonjoo, Leppänen, Jukka M., Macknik, Stephen, Majaranta, Päivi, Martinez-Conde, Susana, Nuthmann, Antje, Nyström, Marcus, Orquin, Jacob L., Otero-Millan, Jorge, Park, Soon Young, Popelka, Stanislav, Proudlock, Frank, Renkewitz, Frank, Roorda, Austin, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, Sharif, Bonita, Shic, Frederick, Shovman, Mark, Thomas, Mervyn G., Venrooij, Ward, Zemblys, Raimondas, and Hessels, Roy S.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Author

Holmqvist, Kenneth, Örbom, Saga Lee, Hooge, Ignace T. C., Niehorster, Diederick C., Alexander, Robert G., Andersson, Richard, Benjamins, Jeroen S., Blignaut, Pieter, Brouwer, Anne-Marie, Chuang, Lewis L., Dalrymple, Kirsten A., Drieghe, Denis, Dunn, Matt J., Ettinger, Ulrich, Fiedler, Susann, Foulsham, Tom, van der Geest, Jos N., Hansen, Dan Witzner, Hutton, Samuel B., Kasneci, Enkelejda, Kingstone, Alan, Knox, Paul C., Kok, Ellen M., Lee, Helena, Lee, Joy Yeonjoo, Leppänen, Jukka M., Macknik, Stephen, Majaranta, Päivi, Martinez-Conde, Susana, Nuthmann, Antje, Nyström, Marcus, Orquin, Jacob L., Otero-Millan, Jorge, Park, Soon Young, Popelka, Stanislav, Proudlock, Frank, Renkewitz, Frank, Roorda, Austin, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, Sharif, Bonita, Shic, Frederick, Shovman, Mark, Thomas, Mervyn G., Venrooij, Ward, Zemblys, Raimondas, and Hessels, Roy S.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Retraction Note: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Author

Holmqvist, Kenneth, primary, Örbom, Saga Lee, additional, Hooge, Ignace T. C., additional, Niehorster, Diederick C., additional, Alexander, Robert G., additional, Andersson, Richard, additional, Benjamins, Jeroen S., additional, Blignaut, Pieter, additional, Brouwer, Anne-Marie, additional, Chuang, Lewis L., additional, Dalrymple, Kirsten A., additional, Drieghe, Denis, additional, Dunn, Matt J., additional, Ettinger, Ulrich, additional, Fiedler, Susann, additional, Foulsham, Tom, additional, van der Geest, Jos N., additional, Hansen, Dan Witzner, additional, Hutton, Samuel B., additional, Kasneci, Enkelejda, additional, Kingstone, Alan, additional, Knox, Paul C., additional, Kok, Ellen M., additional, Lee, Helena, additional, Lee, Joy Yeonjoo, additional, Leppänen, Jukka M., additional, Macknik, Stephen, additional, Majaranta, Päivi, additional, Martinez-Conde, Susana, additional, Nuthmann, Antje, additional, Nyström, Marcus, additional, Orquin, Jacob L., additional, Otero-Millan, Jorge, additional, Park, Soon Young, additional, Popelka, Stanislav, additional, Proudlock, Frank, additional, Renkewitz, Frank, additional, Roorda, Austin, additional, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, additional, Sharif, Bonita, additional, Shic, Frederick, additional, Shovman, Mark, additional, Thomas, Mervyn G., additional, Venrooij, Ward, additional, Zemblys, Raimondas, additional, and Hessels, Roy S., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Author

Holmqvist, Kenneth, primary, Örbom, Saga Lee, additional, Hooge, Ignace T. C., additional, Niehorster, Diederick C., additional, Alexander, Robert G., additional, Andersson, Richard, additional, Benjamins, Jeroen S., additional, Blignaut, Pieter, additional, Brouwer, Anne-Marie, additional, Chuang, Lewis L., additional, Dalrymple, Kirsten A., additional, Drieghe, Denis, additional, Dunn, Matt J., additional, Ettinger, Ulrich, additional, Fiedler, Susann, additional, Foulsham, Tom, additional, van der Geest, Jos N., additional, Hansen, Dan Witzner, additional, Hutton, Samuel B., additional, Kasneci, Enkelejda, additional, Kingstone, Alan, additional, Knox, Paul C., additional, Kok, Ellen M., additional, Lee, Helena, additional, Lee, Joy Yeonjoo, additional, Leppänen, Jukka M., additional, Macknik, Stephen, additional, Majaranta, Päivi, additional, Martinez-Conde, Susana, additional, Nuthmann, Antje, additional, Nyström, Marcus, additional, Orquin, Jacob L., additional, Otero-Millan, Jorge, additional, Park, Soon Young, additional, Popelka, Stanislav, additional, Proudlock, Frank, additional, Renkewitz, Frank, additional, Roorda, Austin, additional, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, additional, Sharif, Bonita, additional, Shic, Frederick, additional, Shovman, Mark, additional, Thomas, Mervyn G., additional, Venrooij, Ward, additional, Zemblys, Raimondas, additional, and Hessels, Roy S., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. WebDiP: A tool for information search experiments on the World-Wide Web

Author

Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck and Moritz Neun

Subjects
Internet, business.industry, Computer science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Research process, Track (rail transport), World Wide Web, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology, Humans, The Internet, Psychology (miscellaneous), Decision process, business, Software, General Psychology
Abstract

We describe WebDiP (Web Decision Processes)--an open-source, online tool-which enables a researcher to track participants while they search for information in a database, available through the Internet. After various instructions on setup and configuration are given, a detailed view of WebDiP explains the system's technical features. Furthermore, other open-source tools are mentioned that helped in programming WebDiP, running it, or analyzing data gathered with it. We present new approaches of how open-source thinking can be incorporated into a research process and discuss future perspectives of WebDiP.

Published
2005

10. The pyeTribe: Simultaneous eyetracking for economic games.

Author

Lejarraga, Tomás, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, and Smedema, Daniel

Abstract

The recent introduction of inexpensive eyetrackers has opened up a wealth of opportunities for researchers to study attention in interactive tasks. No software package has previously been available to help researchers exploit those opportunities. We created ''the pyeTribe,'' a software package that offers, among others, the following features: first, a communication platform between many eyetrackers to allow for simultaneous recording of multiple participants; second, the simultaneous calibration of multiple eyetrackers without the experimenter’s supervision; third, data collection restricted to periods of interest, thus reducing the volume of data and easing analysis.We used a standard economic game (the public goods game) to examine the data quality and demonstrate the potential of our software package.Moreover,we conducted a modeling analysis, which illustrates how combining process and behavioral data can improve models of human decision-making behavior in social situations. Our software is open source. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Information search in the laboratory and on the Web: With or without an experimenter

Author

Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael and Huber, Oswald

Abstract

Abstract: The focus of this study is the effect of the location (laboratory vs. Web) of experiments on active information searchin decision-making tasks. In two experiments, participants were confronted with two different search method versions (list vs. keyword) for acquiring information about a task from a database. The amount and type of information gathered and the time required for task completion were measured. In Experiment 1, significantly more information was searched for in the laboratory than on the Web when the list version was employed, whereas there was no difference between locations in the keyword version. In Experiment 2, the participants were assigned randomly to the Web or the laboratory condition. The results of Experiment 1 were replicated. Whereas location (and the presence or absence of an experimenter) had an effect on the absolute amount of information gathered in both experiments, the relative distribution and type of information items did not differ.

Published
2003
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results