Search

Background: Although peripheral nervous system involvement is common in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), central nervous system (CNS) manifestations are poorly described. This study aimed to describe CNS involvement in EGPA., Patients and Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with EGPA and CNS involvement affecting cranial nerves, brain and/or spinal cord. We also undertook a systematic literature review., Results: We analyzed 26 personal cases and 62 previously reported cases. At EGPA diagnosis, asthma was noted in 97%, eosinophilia in 98%, peripheral neuropathy in 55% and cardiac involvement in 41%. 38/71 (54%) were ANCA-positive, with a perinuclear-labeling pattern and/or anti-MPO specificity. CNS was involved in 86% at EGPA diagnosis, preceded EGPA in 2%, and occurred during follow-up in 12% after a median of 24months. Main neurological manifestations were ischemic cerebrovascular lesions in 46 (52%), intracerebral hemorrhage and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage in 21 (24%), loss of visual acuity in 28 (33%) (15 with optic neuritis, 9 with central retinal artery occlusion, 4 with cortical blindness), and cranial nerves palsies in 18 (21%), with 25 patients having ≥1 of these clinical CNS manifestations. Among the 81 patients with assessable neurological responses, 43% had complete responses without sequelae, 43% had partial responses with long-term sequelae and 14% refractory disease. After a mean follow-up of 36months, 11 patients died including 5 from intracerebral hemorrhages., Conclusion: EGPA-related CNS manifestations form 4 distinct neurological pictures: ischemic lesions, intracerebral hemorrhages, cranial nerve palsies and loss of visual acuity. Such manifestation should prompt practitioners to consider EGPA in such conditions. Long-term neurological sequelae were common, and intracerebral hemorrhages had the worst prognostic impact., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Despite conventional immunosuppressants, active and steroid-dependent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a therapeutic challenge. Only one biologic, belimumab, has been approved, but other biologics are sometimes used off-label. Given the lack of evidence-based data in some clinical situations encountered in real life, we developed expert recommendations for the use of biologics for SLE., Methods: The recommendations were developed by a formal consensus method. This method aims to formalize the degree of agreement among experts by identifying, through iterative ratings with feedback, the points on which experts agree, disagree or are undecided. Hence, the recommendations are based on the agreed-upon points. We gathered the opinion of 59 French-speaking SLE experts from 3 clinical networks dedicated to systemic autoimmune diseases (FLEUR, IMIDIATE, FAI2R) from Algeria, Belgium, France, Italy, Morocco, Switzerland and Tunisia. Represented medical specialities were internal medicine (49%), rheumatology (34%), nephrology (7%), dermatology (5%), pediatrics (3%) and cardiology (2%). Two methodologists and 3 strictly independent SLE expert groups contributed to developing these recommendations: a steering group (SG) (n=9), an evaluation group (EG) (n=28) and a reading group (RG) (n=22). Preliminary recommendations were drafted by the SG, then proposed to the EG. Each EG member rated the degree of agreement from 1 to 9 (1: lowest; 9: strongest) for each recommendation. After 2 rating rounds, the SG submitted a new version of the recommendations to the RG. With comments from the RG, the SG finalised the recommendations., Results: A total of 17 final recommendations were formulated by the SG, considering all agreement scores and comments by the EG and RG members and the two methodologists. These recommendations define the subset of patients who require a biologic; the type of biologics to use (belimumab, rituximab, etc.) depending on the organ involvement and associated co-treatments; what information should be given to patients; and how to evaluate treatment efficacy and when to consider discontinuation., Conclusion: Overall, 17 recommendations for the good use of biologics in SLE were formulated by a large panel of SLE experts to provide guidance for clinicians in daily practice. These recommendations will be regularly updated according to the results of new randomized trials and increasing real life experience., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)