Search

Objective: To investigate the factors that are associated with medical student interest in remote and very remote practice in Australia. Design: Aggregated data of an annual cross‐sectional survey from 2013 to 2017. Setting: Australia. Participants: Medical students from 17 medical schools, at the point of finishing one year of clinical training in a rural or remote location in Australia. Main outcome measures: Intention for working in a remote or very remote location as a doctor. Results: Responses were analysed from 3328 medical students. From this cohort, 37.6%, 54.0% and 7.0% of students reported future career intent in capital or major cities; regional Australia; and remote or very remote Australia respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated students interested in remote and very remote practice compared to those interested in regional practice were more likely to be from a rural background, have prior generalist intentions, felt as though their rural clinical school (RCS) experience increased interest in remote and very remote practice, and had higher rural practice self‐efficacy. Odds ratios were larger for these factors when students interested in remote or very remote practice were compared with students interested in practicing in capital or major cities. Conclusions: Rural background, prior generalist intentions, rural practice self‐efficacy and the overall influence of the RCS experience are associated with interest in remote and very remote practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Rural exposure during medical school is associated with increased rural work after graduation. How much of the increase in rural workforce by these graduates is due to pre-existing interest and plans to work rurally and how much is related to the extended clinical placement is not known. Design This cohort study compared the employment location of medical graduates who professed no rural interest as undergraduates (negative control), with those who applied but did not participate in Rural Clinical School of Western Australia ( RCSWA) (positive control), and those who applied and participated in RCSWA (participants). Participants All 1026 University of Western Australia students who had an opportunity to apply for a year-long rotation in RCSWA from 2004 to 2010, and who had subsequently graduated by the end of 2011, were included. Main Outcome Measure Graduates' principal workplace location ( AHPRA, Feb 2014). Result The three groups differed significantly in their graduate work locations (χ2 = 39.2, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only being of older age at graduation ( OR 2.28 (95% CI 1.40, 3.72), P = 0.001), being from a rural background ( OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.85, 4.85), P < 0.001), being a recipient of a Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship ( OR 3.36 (95% CI 1.68, 6.73, P = 0.001) and actually participating in the RCSWA remained significantly related to rural work ( OR 3.10 (95% CI 1.95, 4.93), P < 0.001). Conclusion After accounting for other factors relating to rural work, RCSWA graduates were three times more likely to work rurally than either control group. These data suggest that RCSWA has a significant independent effect on rural workforce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the feasibility of using a General Practice registrar ( GPR) to coordinate rural palliative care services. Design A quasi-experimental design was used. Intervention group participants received the GPR service, which involved liaison among the patient, family, General Practitioner, specialist palliative care team and community nurses. Specified risk assessment, care planning and continuity of care were provided. Patients in the comparison group received the standard service. Setting Rural community palliative care. Participants: One hundred and ninety-one rural community palliative care patients (99 intervention and 92 control patients). Main outcome measures: Hospital admissions per 100 patient-days, bed-days per 100 patient-days and proportion of deaths at home. Results Patients receiving standard care were twice as likely to spend ≥8 bed-days in hospital ( OR 2.09 (95% CI 1.10-3.97); P = 0.02) and were more likely to have ≥ 2 admissions to hospital ( OR 3.37 (95% CI 1.83-6.21); P < 0.001), per 100 patient-days than the intervention group after adjusting for diagnosis group (cancer or not) and residence in residential aged care. Controls were significantly less likely to die at home than the intervention group ( OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.20-0.86); P = 0.02). Conclusion This is a small proof of concept pilot study limited by lack of randomisation. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using a GPR to manage continuity of care for rural community palliative care patients. Given the potential confounding factors, further investigation via a larger randomised trial is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]