Search

Background: The lack of access to and uptake of postpartum contraception is a key contributor to an estimated 121 million unintended pregnancies worldwide. Research on counselling and women's preferences for postpartum contraception is scarce in Australia. We therefore aimed to explore Australian women's experiences of, and preferences for, accessing postpartum contraceptive counselling. Method: In this qualitative study, English-speaking women of reproductive age (18–40 years) with at least one child under the age of 5 years were recruited via social media to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interviews focussed on women's experiences of, and preferences for, postpartum contraception. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. Results: Twenty women participated. Most did not receive in-depth contraceptive counselling antenatally or postnatally, though had brief discussions with their GPs or obstetricians at the 6-week postnatal check. Participants felt some counselling throughout their antenatal and postnatal care would have been useful, particularly those who experienced medical complications perinatally. Most participants expressed a general preference for their GP or a midwife to provide such counselling, rather than an obstetrician or nurse, and they noted characteristics such as compassion, trust and care as being particularly important. Conclusion: The provision of postpartum contraceptive counselling could be enhanced in Australia. Contraceptive uptake in the postpartum period may be promoted by ensuring consistent and routine provision of contraceptive counselling for women antenatally and postnatally by their maternity carers. Access to postpartum contraception can reduce unintended pregnancies and enhance interconception health. Findings from our study suggest there is no consistent provision of postpartum contraception counselling to women; however, women are interested in receiving this both antenatally and postnatally from GPs and midwives. Contraceptive uptake in the postpartum period may be promoted by ensuring consistent and routine provision of contraceptive counselling for women antenatally and postnatally by their maternity carers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Access to publicly funded abortion in Australia is limited, with a considerable proportion carried out by private providers. There are no nationally reported data on public abortion services, and referral pathways are poorly coordinated between hospital and primary care sectors. HealthPathways is an online system for use in primary care that provides information on referral pathways to local services. The aim of this study was to describe abortion referral pathways for each HealthPathways portal in Australia. Methods: A review of Australian HealthPathways content on abortion was undertaken between January and June 2022. For each HealthPathways portal, data were extracted on referral options to abortion services. Results: Overall, 17 out of 34 Australian HealthPathways consented to be included. Nearly half (47%) had no public services listed for surgical abortion, and 35% had no public services for medical abortion. The majority (64% for surgical abortion, 67% for medical abortion) emphasised that public services should be considered only as a last resort. There was variation in information regarding gestation-specific options, the time-critical nature of referrals, and the importance of women's own preference when deciding between medical or surgical abortion. Conclusion: Despite few remaining legal restrictions to abortion, many regions across Australia either do not have public abortion services or do not provide information about them. There is an urgent need for transparency around public abortion service availability, clear guidelines to support referral pathways, and commitment from State and Federal governments to expand the availability of accessible, no-cost abortion in Australia. Access to publicly funded abortion in Australia is limited, and there are no nationally reported data on service availability. Despite few remaining legal restrictions to abortion, this study found that many regions across Australia either do not have public abortion services or do not provide information about them. There is an urgent need for transparency around public abortion and commitment from State and Federal governments to expand the availability of accessible, no-cost abortion in Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preconception care (PCC) is effective in reducing modifiable risk factors and optimising maternal health. Primary care services such as general practices in Australia are an appropriate setting to provide PCC. However, PCC is not routinely provided in most of these settings, and many reproductive-aged women and men are not aware of the need for PCC. In this forum article, we discuss the factors that hinder PCC provision in Australian general practices and make recommendations on how access to PCC services can be broadened in Australia, including the potential opportunity for general practice nurses to contribute to the provision of PCC. The preconception period refers to the period before a woman becomes pregnant and there is evidence that maintaining optimal health during this period is important for the mother and baby. General practices in Australia are an appropriate setting to provide preconception care, which involves providing education to help improve health during the preconception period. In this article, we discuss the factors that hinder preconception care provision in Australian general practices and make recommendations on how access to preconception care services can be broadened in Australia, including the potential opportunity for general practice nurses to contribute to the provision of preconception care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Almost one in four women in Australia experience an unintended pregnancy during their lifetime; of these, approximately 30% currently end in abortion. Although early medical abortion (EMA) up to 9 weeks gestation is becoming more widely available in Australia, it is still not commonly offered in primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the provision of EMA in primary care. Methods: A sample of 150 general practitioners (GPs) and 150 registered nurses (RNs) working in Australia responded to a best–worst scaling survey designed to answer the following question: what are the most important facilitators and barriers to the provision of EMA in primary care? Results: GPs believe that the lack of clinical guidelines, the amount of information provision and counselling required, and the fact that women who are not their patients may not return for follow-up are the most important barriers. For RNs, these three barriers, together with the stigma of being known as being involved in the provision of EMA, are the most important barriers. The formation of a community of practice to support the provision of EMA was identified by both professions as the most important facilitator. Conclusions: Having access to a community of practice, enhanced training and reducing stigma will encourage the provision of EMA. Although clinical guidelines are available, they need to be effectively disseminated, implemented and endorsed by peak bodies. Primary care practices should consider using task sharing and developing patient resources to facilitate the provision of information and counselling. Although available, early medical abortion is not commonly offered in general practice. When asked, GPs and RNs reported that lack of clinical guidelines, the need to provide information and counselling, and follow-up issues were important barriers to the provision of early medical abortion, whereas having access to a community of practice was the most important facilitator. Guidelines are available, but require dissemination and implementation. Task sharing and appropriate remuneration will encourage more GPs to offer early medical abortion, so it is seen as an essential service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the population ages, so does the prevalence of dementia, a condition in which timely advance care planning (ACP) is recommended. This study explored the barriers and enablers of ACP for Australian GPs caring for people with dementia. Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews informed by the theoretical domains framework (TDF) were conducted with 16 GPs from the south-east region of metropolitan Melbourne. The most prevalent domains of the TDF were: (1) environmental context and resources; (2) beliefs about consequences; and (3) social/professional role and identity. Further thematic analysis found that: (1) ACP was felt to be within the scope of general practice, but more so before the onset of dementia because lack of confidence in capacity assessment acted as a barrier once a diagnosis was made; (2) beliefs about the perceived benefits of ACP motivated GPs to engage patients in ACP; and (3) doctors felt that patients were often reluctant to discuss ACP, especially in the time-pressured context of the standard consultation. This study's use of the TDF provides direction for potential interventions to alleviate challenges faced by Australian GPs with ACP in dementia. Improving ACP in general practice may require a focus on public health campaigns to educate patients about the benefits of ACP before the onset of dementia. GPs' difficulty assessing a patient's decisional capacity may be addressed through skills development workshops. Advance care planning (ACP) leads to better outcomes for patients and is particularly relevant for people with dementia who eventually lose the capacity to take part in their own medical treatment planning. This study found that GPs see themselves as having an important role in ACP for those with dementia, but are hindered by barriers at the patient, practitioner and system level. The results of this study have implications for improving the quality of care for patients with dementia by increasing the uptake of ACP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The papers in this special issue explore a range of issues and opportunities across the spectrum of sexual and reproductive health in primary care, including in relation to contraception access; support for unintended pregnancies; abortion care; preconception, pregnancy, postpartum and interconception care; and issues relating to informed consent. The special issue takes a reproductive life course perspective through consideration of both pregnancy prevention and pregnancy preparation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]