Search

Background: General practitioners (GPs) have played an integral role in Australia's coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. However, little is known about how GPs themselves have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to increase our understanding of the experiences of GPs working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Using purposive sampling, 15 GPs from South-Eastern Australia were asked to reflect on their experiences during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes were identified: fear of infection; uncertainty and information overload; impacts on the government–GP relationship; impacts on the patient–doctor relationship; and teamwork within practices and among GPs. Conclusions: The 15 GPs interviewed in this study provided valuable insights into their experiences working during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. From these insights, four recommendations propose what could be done to help support GPs to respond to a pandemic while continuing to deliver primary health care. Although general practitioners (GPs) have played a crucial role in Australia's COVID-19 pandemic response, few studies have explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on GPs themselves. In this qualitative study, 15 GPs from South-Eastern Australia were asked to reflect on their experiences working during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in semi-structured interviews. Their reflections enhance our understanding of the experience of GPs working during the COVID-19 pandemic and may help guide future research and work to support GPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) are the most effective contraceptive methods available in Australia and are effective for between 3 and 8 years. Early LARC removal (<12 months of use) can lead to gaps in contraceptive cover, exposing women to the risk of unplanned pregnancy. This study explored the experiences of doctors working in primary care (GPs and sexual health physicians) when asked to remove LARC earlier than expected. From May to July 2020, 13 doctors in Melbourne, Australia, were interviewed. Overall, participants felt conflicted about early LARC removal requests; participants highlighted the importance of respecting patient autonomy, but many felt that patients should ideally persist with LARC longer. Participants found balancing a desire to respect patients' autonomy with their clinical responsibility challenging. Doctors used reassurance, delaying tactics and treatment of side effects to try and prolong LARC use. However, this balancing act led many doctors to perceive a tension between themselves and their patients when early LARC removal was requested. Incorporating professional education addressing these issues may help primary care providers better anticipate and navigate the tension surrounding early LARC removal consultations and maintain effective doctor–patient relationships. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are the most effective contraceptive methods available, and although most women keep their LARC in for the prescribed length of time, others will request early removal. This study found a perceived tension between doctors and their patients when early LARC removal was requested. Appropriate training and more relevant professional development may help primary care providers better navigate the tension surrounding early LARC removal consultations and maintain effective doctor–patient relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer care spans both hospital- and community-based healthcare settings, and suboptimal communication between healthcare providers impacts on continuity and quality of care. Patients' experiences regarding: (1) communication between healthcare providers; and (2) the role of their GP during cancer treatment was explored in interviews with 47 Western Australian lung cancer patients. Thematic analysis using a phenomenological approach was undertaken to derive key themes regarding participant experiences. Poor communication between hospital cancer specialists (HCSs) influenced participants' treatment choices and perceptions of the quality of their care. Information provided by HCSs to GPs was often delayed or incomplete, and many participants perceived themselves as a messenger between healthcare settings. Participants' opinions about the GP role during cancer treatment ranged from 'no role' to an 'active member of the treating team'. A new model of cancer care is needed where the GP is considered part of the treating team. Early involvement of GPs and two-way communication between hospital and primary care during the disease continuum is required for this to occur. Lung cancer care occurs in the hospital and the community and good communication between all healthcare providers is essential. Many patients experienced delayed or incomplete communication practices and reported the burden of information transfer falling on them. Most patients wanted their GP to be well informed about their cancer care. Early GP involvement and two-way communication between health professionals looking after lung cancer patients is needed to support patients in their journey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the chronic shortages of GPs in Australian rural and remote regions, considerable numbers of international medical graduates (IMG) have been recruited. IMG experience many difficulties when relocating to Australia with one of the most significant being effective GP-patient communication. Given that this is essential for effective consultation it can have a substantial impact on health care. A purposive sample of seven practising GPs (five IMG, two Australian-trained doctors (ATD)) was interviewed using a semistructured face-to-face interviewing technique. GPs from Nigeria, Egypt, United Kingdom, India, Singapore and Australia participated. Interviews were transcribed and then coded. The authors used qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify common themes. IMG-patient communication barriers were considered significant in the Wheatbelt region as identified by both IMG and ATD. ATD indicated they were aware of IMG-patient communication issues resulting in subsequent consults with patients to explain results and diagnoses. Significantly, a lack of communication between ATD and IMG also emerged, creating a further barrier to effective communication. Analysis of the data generated several important findings that rural GP networks should consider when integrating new IMG into the community. Addressing the challenges related to cross-cultural differences should be a priority, in order to enable effective communication. More open communication between ATD and IMG about GP-patient communication barriers and education programs around GP-patient communication would help both GP and patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a a qualitative study investigating patients' experiences of ongoing smoking or smoking cessation after hospitalisation for an acute coronary syndrome and describes how study participants spoke about the role of their doctors in smoking cessation. It invited individuals who had been admitted to an Australian public hospital in 2005 with a discharge diagnosis of an acute cardiac syndrome and who were smokers at the time of their hospitalisation to participate.