Search

Background: Studies in southern New Zealand indicate that up to a quarter of women experienced infertility, likely due to delay in childbearing. However, these findings may not be generalisable to the whole population. Aims: To assess the lifetime prevalence of infertility and evidence for disparities for New Zealand men and women in a nationally representative sample. Materials and Methods: In 2014/15 a general health survey with a module on sexual and reproductive health was conducted among New Zealand residents aged 16–74 years; 3792 men and 5222 women provided information on infertility. Result(s): There were 8.2% (95% CI 7.1–9.4%) of men and 12.5% (11.3–13.8%) of women who had experienced infertility; among fertility‐tested women this was 15.4% (14.0–16.9%). Prevalence peaked in the 35–44 year age group (14.3% for men, 19.1% for women and 20.8% for fertility‐tested women). Estimates for European, Māori and Asian ethnicities were similar. Pacific men and women had higher relative risks: 2.37 (95% CI 1.51–3.71) and 1.76 (1.27–2.44), respectively, compared with Europeans. Medical help was sought by 69.3% (95% CI 62.4–75.5%) of infertile men and 68.2% (63.1–72.9%) of women; this was significantly lower for Māori and Pacific. Conclusions: Infertility levels for those of European ethnicity were similar to studies in southern New Zealand, and in other high‐income countries. However, infertility levels were just as high for Māori, and higher for Pacific people, despite experiencing fertility at younger ages. Focusing on reducing causes of infertility other than delayed childbearing would likely contribute to addressing this health disparity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Low Apgar scores are associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality, but effects of Apgar scores of 0–5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (compared with 10) on longer‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes are less clear. Aim: To examine the associations between Apgar scores of 0–5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (compared with 10) and children's educational outcomes as measured by the Australian National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) tests at age eight. Materials and Methods: We merged perinatal data including all children born in South Australia from 1999 to 2008 with school assessment data (NAPLAN). School assessments included five learning areas (domains)—reading, writing, spelling, grammar and numeracy. Each domain was categorised according to performing at or below National Minimum Standards (≤NMS). Effects were estimated using Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) accounting for a range of maternal, perinatal and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Risk differences comparing five‐minute Apgar scores of 0–5 with Apgar scores of 10 for children performing ≤NMS for each domain were: reading (0.07 (95% CI −0.16 to 0.29)), writing (0.27 (95% CI −0.14 to 0.68)), spelling (0.15 (95% CI −0.10 to 0.40)), grammar (0.04 (95% CI −0.21 to 0.29)) and numeracy (0.21 (95% CI −0.04 to 0.45)). Risk differences for children performing ≤NMS were also evident when Apgar score of 6 was compared with Apgar score of 10. Conclusions: Children with five‐minute Apgar scores of 0–5 and 6, compared with Apgar score of 10, are at higher risk of scoring at/below the NMS on the NAPLAN assessments at eight years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]