Search

Background: The New Zealand (NZ) Ministry of Health ethnicity data protocols recommend that people of South Asian (SAsian) ethnicity, other than Indian, are combined with people of Japanese and Korean ethnicity at the most commonly used level of aggregation in health research (level two). This may not work well for perinatal studies, as it has long been observed that women of Indian ethnicity have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as perinatal death. It is possible that women of other SAsian ethnicities share this risk. Aims: This study was performed to identify appropriate groupings of women of SAsian ethnicity for perinatal research. Materials and Methods: National maternity and neonatal data, and singleton birth records between 2008 and 2017 were linked using the Statistics NZ Integrated Data Infrastructure. Socio‐demographic risk profiles and pregnancy outcomes were compared between 15 ethnic groups. Recommendations were made based on statistical analyses and cultural evaluation with members of the SAsian research community. Results: Similarities were observed between women of Indian, Fijian Indian, South African Indian, Sri Lankan, Bangladeshi and Pakistani ethnicities. A lower‐risk profile was seen among Japanese and Korean mothers. Risk profiles of women of combined Indian‐Māori, Indian‐Pacific and Indian‐New Zealand European ethnicity more closely represented their corresponding non‐Indian ethnicities. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we suggest a review of current NZ Ministry of Health ethnicity data protocols. We recommend that researchers understand the risk profiles of participants prior to aggregation of groups in research, to mitigate risks associated with masking differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Internationally, placental growth factor (PlGF)‐based tests are used as prognostic markers in suspected preeclampsia. However, Ministry of Health guidelines do not currently endorse PlGF‐based tests in New Zealand (NZ). Aims: To investigate the predictive value of soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt‐1)/PlGF ratio in suspected preeclampsia in a NZ population. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at 20+0–36+6 weeks gestation with suspected preeclampsia as defined by Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and NZ (SOMANZ) criteria. Primary objective: to evaluate a sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio >38 at ≤35+0 weeks gestation to predict birth ≤14 days. Secondary objectives: to assess a sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio cut‐off of 38 at ≤37+0 weeks gestation, to rule out preeclampsia ≤1 week, rule in preeclampsia ≤4 weeks, and to predict perinatal outcome. Clinicians were blinded to sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio results. Results: Included were 222 participants, 19.4% Māori and 10.4% Pasifika. A sFlt‐1/PlGF >38 predicted birth ≤14 days, positive predictive value (PPV) 51.4% (95% CI, 39.6–63.0) and negative predictive value (NPV) 95.9% (95% CI, 91.4–98.1), median (interquartile range) days to birth 14 (2–27) vs 49 (33–70), P < 0.000. A sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off of 38 ruled out preeclampsia ≤1 week (NPV 96.2% (95% CI, 92.3–98.2)) and ruled in preeclampsia ≤4 weeks (PPV 75.0% (95% CI, 65.0–82.9)). A sFlt‐1/PlGF >38 was associated with greater perinatal morbidity. Conclusions: The predictive value of the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio in NZ is comparable to that reported in international trials. Used in clinical practice the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio may aid risk stratification in suspected preeclampsia, directing limited resources to those pregnancies at highest risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The number of vaginal breech and twin deliveries may be insufficient for adequate training. Objective: To determine whether advanced trainees and new Fellows in obstetrics are gaining adequate experience and confidence in vaginal breech and twin deliveries. Methods: An online survey was emailed to registered Royal Australia and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (RANZCOG) advanced trainees and new Fellows (Years 1–5). This survey asked about their experience, confidence and whether they intend to perform vaginal breech and twin deliveries as specialists. Results: The survey was sent to 703 advanced trainees (162) and Fellows (541) and answered by 217 (31.7%). Experience and confidence in vaginal breech and twin deliveries increased with the number of procedures performed (P < 0.001) in both groups and were significantly higher among Fellows. Despite the level of experience, 100% of respondents felt confident in managing vaginal twin deliveries with or without supervision, whereas 14.9% of respondents did not feel confident in managing vaginal breech deliveries. Intention to offer these procedures in their practice depended on confidence levels, and there was a significant difference between twins and breech. Overall, 87.3% of respondents intended to offer vaginal twin deliveries in their practice, while only 32.7% intended to offer vaginal breech deliveries. Conclusion: Confidence in complex vaginal deliveries increases with increasing number of procedures performed and a significant proportion of trainees and Fellows consider they do not have sufficient experience. The association between confidence and intention to offer these procedures is stronger in twins than in breech deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Germline BRCA1/2 mutations account for approximately 15% of invasive ovarian carcinomas. Referral of all women with non‐mucinous epithelial tubo‐ovarian and peritoneal cancer, especially high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) to genetic services for genetic counselling and subsequent BRCA testing, has become standard of care in many countries. Publicly funded BRCA testing was restricted to women ≤70 years old with HGSC in New Zealand for most of our study period. Referral rates of women with HGSC for BRCA mutation testing in New Zealand have not previously been reported. Aims: To determine the proportion of eligible patients with tubo‐ovarian or peritoneal HGSC referred to Auckland Gynaecologic Oncology Centre who were referred for genetic counselling. To determine the number of patients who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing and the rate of germline BRCA mutations. Methods: Eligible cases were identified from Auckland Gynaecologic Oncology multidisciplinary meetings database from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014. Genetic referrals sent were checked against the genetic services database to ensure that referrals were received. Genetic counselling clinic attendance, uptake and results of genetic testing were also collected. Results: One hundred and four eligible patients were identified with 58 patients referred. Referral rates increased from 37.5% in 2012 to 64.3% in 2014. Of the 58 patients referred, 53 attended genetic counselling, and 49 underwent BRCA mutation testing, of whom 10 (20.4%) tested positive for a germline BRCA mutation. Conclusion: Overall, 55.8% of eligible patients were referred for genetic testing; however, referral rates increased with time. This BRCA mutation‐positive rate is comparable with current international data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent New Zealand guidelines recommend annual glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements from three months postpartum, replacing the glucose tolerance test (GTT) at six weeks, to screen for persistent hyperglycaemia following gestational diabetes. Data suggest that this screening approach may miss cases of type 2 diabetes, but are they detected at subsequent screening and will screening rates improve? Aims: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of HbA1c monitoring in improving screening rates following gestational diabetes and in detecting postpartum hyperglycaemia. Materials and Methods: During 2015 in Christchurch, all women with gestational diabetes were offered HbA1c and GTT measurements at three months postpartum and subsequent annual HbA1c measurements were recommended. Data from electronic hospital records were collected for a minimum 18 months postpartum. Results: Of the cohort of 333 women, 218 (65%) completed both HbA1c and GTT at three months postpartum, 74 (22%) HbA1c only, 16 (5%) GTT only, 25 (8%) no screening; 184 (55%) had subsequent HbA1c tests. Diabetes was detected by GTT in five (2%) women and by HbA1c in only one out of five (20%); the disagreement between tests resolved in three out of four (75%) women with subsequent testing. Prediabetes was detected by GTT in 30 (14%) women; however, HbA1c only detected five out of 30 (17%) and subsequent HbA1c testing identified a further two out of 30 with prediabetes. Conclusions: HbA1c measurement at three months postpartum had a good uptake. However, most cases of diabetes were identified by subsequent HbA1c testing, the uptake of which was suboptimal. The importance of annual HbA1c monitoring following gestational diabetes needs greater emphasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]