Search

Objectives: A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear.Methods: Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative).Results: A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67.Conclusions: The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to clarify the usefulness of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and establish HRCT criteria for presurgical assessment of the mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatomas of the middle ear.Methods: Retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent primary surgery for pars flaccida cholesteatoma and those who underwent temporal bone HRCT for pretreatment evaluation were reviewed. The distance in the anterior-most portion of the mastoid sinus on HRCT was measured, and the presence of surgically verified mastoid extension of cholesteatoma was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative).Results: A total of 107 patients with pars flaccida cholesteatoma were included. The distance in the M+ cases was significantly longer than that in the M- cases, and the cutoff value was 3.6 mm. The difference between the ipsilateral/diseased-side distance and the contralateral/evaluable side (difference value) in M+ cases was larger than that in M- cases, with a cutoff value of 0.6 mm. The inter-rater reliability of this distance measurement was excellent, regardless of imaging experience.Conclusions: The cutoff values of the distance and the difference value can be used for pretreatment HRCT evaluation of mastoid extension in middle ear cholesteatoma with relatively high accuracy, regardless of the experience and skill levels of the evaluator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]