1. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2): spectrometer performance evaluation using pre-launch direct sun measurements.
- Author
-
Frankenberg, C., Pollock, R., Lee, R. A. M., Rosenberg, R., Blavier, J. F., Crisp, D., O'Dell, C. W., Osterman, G. B., Roehl, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.
- Subjects
CARBON dioxide & the environment ,SCIENTIFIC satellites ,SIGNAL-to-noise ratio ,PERFORMANCE of spectrometers ,FOURIER transform spectrometers - Abstract
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), launched on 2 July 2014, is a NASA mission designed to measure the column-averaged CO
2 dry air mole fraction, XCO2 . Towards that goal, it will collect spectra of reflected sun-light in narrow spectral ranges centered at 0.76, 1.6 and 2.0 µm with a resolving power (λ/△λ) of 20 000. These spectra will be used in an optimal estimation framework to retrieve XCO2 . About 100 000 cloud free soundings of XCO2 each day will allow estimates of net CO2 fluxes on regional to continental scales to be determined. Here, we evaluate the OCO-2 spectrometer performance using pre-launch data acquired during instrument thermal vacuum tests in April 2012. A heliostat and a diffuser plate were used to feed direct sunlight into the OCO-2 instrument and spectra were recorded. These spectra were compared to those collected concurrently from a nearby high-resolution Fourier Transform Spectrometer that was part of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). Using the launch-ready OCO-2 calibration and spectroscopic parameters, we performed to tal column scaling fits to all spectral bands and compared these to TCCON results. On 20 April, we detected a CO2 plume from the Los Angeles basin at the JPL site with strongly enhanced short-term variability on the order of 1% (3-4 ppm). We also found good (<0.5 pppm) inter-footprint consistency in retrieved XCO2 . The variations in spectral fitting residuals are consistent with signal-to-noise estimates from instrument calibration, while average residuals are systematic and mostly attributable to remaining errors in our knowledge of the CO2 and O2 spectroscopic parameters. A few remaining inconsistencies observed during TVAC may be attributable to the specific instrument setup on the ground and will be re-evaluated with in-orbit data, when the instrument is expected to be in a much more stable environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF