Search

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Up to 40% of all dementia cases may be preventable, primarily by treating or acting on well-established cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and physical inactivity. Whether physical inactivity is associated with risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia – a disease influenced by cardiovascular risk factors – and whether a given association differs for physical activity in leisure time and at work remains unknown. We conducted a prospective cohort study including 117,616 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and the Copenhagen City Heart Study with up to 43 years of follow-up. Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for low versus high physical activity at leisure time was 1.60 (95% confidence interval 1.40–1.83) for non-Alzheimer's dementia and 0.94 (0.80–1.11) for Alzheimer's disease. Corresponding values for non-Alzheimer's dementia after additional adjustment for physical activity at work or apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype were 1.60 (1.40–1.83) and 1.82 (1.34–2.15). Multifactorially and APOE adjusted hazard ratios for high versus low physical activity at work were 1.50 (1.10–2.05) for non-Alzheimer's dementia and 1.62 (1.14–2.31) for Alzheimer's disease. When combining the two types of physical activity, physical activity in leisure time had the strongest relationship with risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia. Physical inactivity in leisure time was associated with increased risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia, independent of modifiable risk factors and physical activity at work. The present study thus provides evidence for public health advice on physical activity in leisure time for the vascular part of dementia. [Display omitted] • Prospective study including 117,616 individuals from the general Danish population. • Up to 43 years of follow-up with no losses to follow-up. • Low leisure physical activity associates with high risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia. • Leisure versus work physical activity is superior in predicting risk. • Public health advice on physical activity may prevent non-Alzheimer's dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elevated concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an inherited, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to investigate the clinical utility for patients, and the economic benefit to healthcare systems and society of measuring Lp(a) concentrations more widely today. We conducted a structured literature review to identify the economic and health benefits and costs of measuring the Lp(a) concentration, potential barriers hindering the uptake of the measure, and potential solutions to address them. These findings were then discussed in an advisory board attended by experts and patient organisations. It was found that if Lp(a) concentration is measured more widely today, patients, healthcare system and society would experience clinical and economic benefits even before specific Lp(a) lowering pharmacological treatments become available. Furthermore , a wider uptake of the Lp(a) measurement would support the development of epidemiological data. For Lp(a) measurement to be more widely used, key barriers which are hindering its uptake need to be addressed. These include i) the perception that the measure may have limited clinical value, ii) lack of awareness on Lp(a), iii) lack of data on the CV benefit of reducing Lp(a), iv) technical and clinical guidelines barriers, and v) healthcare system barriers. Scientific communities and industry should collaborate to address technical challenges and deficiencies in clinical guidelines. However, policy intervention will be crucial for national ASCVD plans to acknowledge the importance of Lp(a). [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children with a growth trajectory of overweight have higher levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors than children with a normal-weight trajectory. However, less is known about how trajectories of body mass index (BMI) across the rest of the BMI spectrum relate to CVD risk factors and whether adult BMI affects these associations. Our aim was to examine associations between childhood BMI trajectories and adult CVD risk factors. We included 2466 individuals with childhood weights and heights (ages 6–14) from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register and adult CVD risk factors (ages 20–81) from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Associations between childhood BMI trajectories identified by latent class modelling and CVD risk factors were examined using generalized linear regression analyses with and without adjustment for adult BMI. Normal-weight and overweight were defined by growth references from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We identified four childhood trajectories within the normal-weight spectrum and one trajectory of overweight. Compared to the trajectory with the lowest BMI level, several higher BMI trajectories were associated with worse circumference, HDL and glucose homeostasis in adulthood. The highest trajectory was additionally associated with higher total cholesterol and triglycerides. When adjusting for adult BMI, the higher BMI trajectories had lower waist circumference, blood pressure and triglycerides. Trajectories of BMI within the normal-weight range and in the overweight range are associated with a worse CVD risk profile than in the lowest BMI trajectory, and these associations are modifiable by growth after childhood. Image 1 • Five different trajectories of body mass index from ages 6-14 were identified in a population of 2466 Danish children. • The trajectory above overweight cutoffs was associated with the worst cardiovascular disease risk factor profile. • Even trajectories below overweight cutoffs had worse cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles than the lowest trajectory. • These associations appeared to be modifiable by body mass index development after age 14. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: We tested the hypotheses that Prothrombin G20210A heterozygosity associate with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic heart disease (IHD), and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) in the general population and re-tested risk of IHD and ICVD in two case-control studies. Methods: 9231 individuals from the Danish general population were followed for VTE (VTE=DVT+PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), IHD, myocardial infarction (MI), ICVD, and ischemic stroke (IS) for a median of 24 years. Case-control studies included 2461 IHD cases and 867 ICVD cases. Results: In the general population, Prothrombin G20210A heterozygotes had1.3 (95% CI:0.6–2.9) fold risk for VTE, 0.6 (0.2–2.0) for DVT, 1.7(0.6–4.8) for PE, 1.5(1.1–2.1) for IHD, 1.7(1.1–2.7) for MI, 1.1(0.6–1.9) for ICVD, and 1.1(0.5–2.1) for IS compared to non-carriers. Double heterozygotes for Prothrombin G20210A and Factor V Leiden versus double non-carriers had a multifactorially adjusted hazard ratio for IHD of 6.0(2.0–19). In case-control studies, multifactorially adjusted odds ratios for Prothrombin G20210A heterozygotes versus non-carriers were 2.0(1.1–3.4) for IHD, 2.0(1.0–3.8) for MI, 1.4(0.7–3.1) for ICVD, and 2.1(0.8–5.4) for IS. Conclusion: Prothrombin G20210A heterozygosity alone and in combination with Factor V Leiden R506Q heterozygosity predicts 1.5 and 6.0 fold risk of IHD compared to non-carriers. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]