Search

The association between thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and cardiovascular disease has mainly been determined using clinical categories of disease. We tested the hypothesis that TSH on a continuous scale is associated with risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), aortic valve stenosis (AVS), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and whether these associations are likely to be causal. We first tested whether plasma TSH on a continuous scale was observationally associated with incident cardiovascular events in a prospective cohort study of 105,224 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study followed for a median 7 years. Next, we tested whether a genetic risk score weighted on TSH was associated with cardiovascular endpoints. Finally, using Mendelian randomization, we tested whether the observed associations were likely to be causal. Using restricted cubic splines, lower concentrations of TSH relative to the population median (=1.53 mIU/L) were associated with higher risk of AF, MI, stroke, HF, AVS, and MACE. Comparing individuals with TSH ≤5th percentile (≤0.54 mIU/L) versus >50th percentile (>1.53 mIU/L), hazard ratios (HRs) ranged from 1.12 (1.00–1.26) for stroke to 1.27 (1.11–1.46) for HF. Genetic risk estimates per standard deviation decrease in TSH were 1.28 (1.08–1.52) for AF, 1.35 (1.06–1.71) for MI, 1.06 (0.89–1.26) for stroke, 1.19 (0.94–1.52) for HF, 1.53 (1.03–2.26) for AVS, and 1.09 (0.97–1.23) for MACE. In 105,224 individuals from the general population low plasma TSH was observationally and genetically associated with increased risk of AF, MI, and AVS suggesting that these observations may reflect causal pathways. [Display omitted] • We tested the hypothesis that TSH was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). • 105,224 individuals from the general population were followed for a median of 7 years. • Observationally, TSH below the median was associated with increased risk of CVD. • Genetically, Mendelian randomization suggested possible causal associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tested the hypotheses (i) that elevated lipoprotein(a) is causally associated with both mitral and aortic valve calcification and disease, and (ii) that aortic valve calcification mediates the effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) on aortic valve stenosis. From the Copenhagen General Population study, we included 12,006 individuals who underwent cardiac computed tomography to measure mitral and aortic valve calcification and 85,884 to examine risk of heart valve disease. Participants had information on plasma lipoprotein(a) and genetic instruments associated with plasma lipoprotein(a) to investigate potential causality. At age 70–79 years, 29% and 54% had mitral and aortic valve calcification, respectively. For 10-fold higher lipoprotein(a) levels, multifactorially adjusted odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.13–1.41) and 1.62 (1.48–1.77). For mitral and aortic valve stenosis, corresponding hazard ratios were 0.93 (95%CI:0.40–2.15, 19 events) and 1.54 (1.38–1.71, 1158 events), respectively. For ≤23 versus ≥36 kringle IV type 2 number of repeats, the age and sex adjusted odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.53 (1.18–1.99) and 2.23 (1.81–2.76). For carriers versus non-carriers of LPA rs10455872, odds ratios for mitral and aortic valve calcification were 1.33 (1.13–1.57) and 1.86 (1.64–2.13). For aortic valve stenosis, 31% (95%CI:16%–76%) of the effect of lipoprotein(a) was mediated through calcification. Elevated lipoprotein(a) was genetically and observationally associated with mitral and aortic valve calcification and aortic valve stenosis. Aortic valve calcification mediated 31% of the effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) on aortic valve stenosis. [Display omitted] • More than 12,000 individuals were CT scanned for heart valve calcification. • More than 85,000 individuals were followed in nationwide registries. • Lipoprotein(a) is causally associated with mitral valve calcification. • Lipoprotein(a) causes aortic valve stenosis but not mitral valve regurgitation. • Aortic valve calcification mediates 31% lipoprotein(a) effect on aortic stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]