Search

Background and Aims: Up to 40% of all dementia cases may be preventable, primarily by treating or acting on well-established cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and physical inactivity. Whether physical inactivity is associated with risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia - a disease influenced by cardiovascular risk factors - and whether a given association differs for physical activity in leisure time and at work remains unknown., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study including 117,616 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and the Copenhagen City Heart Study with up to 43 years of follow-up., Results: Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for low versus high physical activity at leisure time was 1.60 (95% confidence interval 1.40-1.83) for non-Alzheimer's dementia and 0.94 (0.80-1.11) for Alzheimer's disease. Corresponding values for non-Alzheimer's dementia after additional adjustment for physical activity at work or apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype were 1.60 (1.40-1.83) and 1.82 (1.34-2.15). Multifactorially and APOE adjusted hazard ratios for high versus low physical activity at work were 1.50 (1.10-2.05) for non-Alzheimer's dementia and 1.62 (1.14-2.31) for Alzheimer's disease. When combining the two types of physical activity, physical activity in leisure time had the strongest relationship with risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia., Conclusions: Physical inactivity in leisure time was associated with increased risk of non-Alzheimer's dementia, independent of modifiable risk factors and physical activity at work. The present study thus provides evidence for public health advice on physical activity in leisure time for the vascular part of dementia., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the new Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) Score and common clinical practice with the Framingham Point Score for classification of individuals with respect to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk., Methods and Results: PRIM Score and the Framingham Point Score were estimated for 11,444 participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Gender specific cumulative incidences and 10 year absolute CHD risks were estimated for subsets defined by age, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes and smoking categories. PRIM defined seven mutually exclusive subsets in women and men, with cumulative incidences of CHD from 0.01 to 0.22 in women, and from 0.03 to 0.26 in men. PRIM versus Framingham Point Score found 11% versus 4% of all women, and 31% versus 35% of all men to have 10 year CHD risks>20%. Among women ≥ 65 years with hypertension and/or with diabetes, 10 year CHD risk>20% was found for 100% with PRIM scoring but for only 18% with the Framingham Point Score., Conclusion: Compared to the PRIM Score, common clinical practice with the Framingham Point Score underestimates CHD risk in women, especially in women≥65 years with hypertension and/or with diabetes., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Zinc Finger Protein 202 (ZNF202) is a transcriptional repressor of genes affecting the vascular endothelium as well as lipid metabolism. A phenotype associated with genetic variation in ZNF202 is presently unknown. We tested the hypothesis that a common variant in ZNF202, A154V, predicts risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD)., Methods and Results: We conducted a prospective study of more than 9000 individuals from the general population with 24 years follow-up. In women, age-adjusted hazard ratios in heterozygotes and homozygotes versus non-carriers were 1.2 (95% CI: 1.0-1.5, P = 0.04) and 1.5 (1.1-2.1, P = 0.007) for IHD, 1.5 (1.1-2.1; P = 0.01) and 1.7 (1.1-2.8, P = 0.02) for MI, and 1.3 (1.0-1.8, P = 0.07) and 1.3 (0.8-2.1; P = 0.33) for ICVD. Adjustments for lipids and lipoproteins did not alter these hazard ratios substantially. Genotype did not predict risk in men. Finally, results for IHD were borderline significant (P = 0.06) in an independent case-control study including 933 patients and 8068 controls., Conclusion: This is the first study to suggest that ZNF202 could be a new candidate gene for IHD and MI in the general population.