Search

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is accelerated in people with diabetes. Dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation play a role via a variety of mechanisms operative in the artery wall. In addition, some unique features predispose people with type 1 diabetes to accelerated atherosclerosis. Various organizations have created guidelines that provide advice regarding screening, risk assessment, and roadmaps for treatment to prevent ASCVD in diabetes. Management of dyslipidemia, especially with statins, has proven to be of immense benefit in the prevention of clinical CVD. However, since many patients fail to attain the low levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) recommended in these guidelines, supplemental therapy, such as the addition of ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors, is often required to reach LDL goals. As a result, the upfront use of combination therapies, particularly a statin plus ezetimibe, is a rational initial approach. The addition to statins of drugs that specifically lower triglyceride levels has not proven beneficial, although the addition of icosapent-ethyl has been shown to be of value, likely by mechanisms independent of triglyceride lowering. Newer treatments in development, including apoC-III and ANGPTL3 inhibitors, seem promising in further reducing apoB-containing lipoproteins., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Proper prescription and high adherence to intensive lipid lowering drugs (LLD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are crucial and strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to investigate long-term treatment patterns and adherence to LLD following hospitalization for a CHD event., Methods: Patients admitted to two Norwegian hospitals with a CHD event from 2011 to 2014 (N = 1094) attended clinical examination and completed a questionnaire, median 16 months later. Clinical data were linked to pharmacy dispensing data from 2010 to 2020. The proportions using high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 40/80 mg or rosuvastatin 20/40 mg) and non-statin LLD after the CHD event were assessed. Adherence was evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and gaps in treatment., Results: Median age at hospitalization was 63 (IQR 12) years, 21 % were female. Altogether, 1054 patients (96 %) were discharged with a statin prescription, while treatment was dispensed in 85 % within the following 90 days. During median 8 (SD 2.5) years follow-up, the proportion using high-intensity statin therapy ranged 62-68 %, whereas the use of ezetimibe increased from 4 to 26 %. PDC <0.8 was found in 22 % of statin users and 26 % of ezetimibe users. The proportions with a treatment gap exceeding 180 days were 22 % for statins and 28 % for ezetimibe. Smoking at hospitalization and negative affectivity were significantly associated with reduced statin adherence, regardless of adherence measure., Conclusions: In this long-term follow-up of patients with CHD, less than 70 % used high-intensity statin therapy with only small changes over time, and only 25 % used additional treatment with ezetimibe. We identified factors associated with reduced statin adherence that may be target for interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:IE and CB are affiliated with Oslo Economics and have completed consultancy assignments outside the submitted work for several public and private institutions in recent years. HS is affiliated with Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus and has received consultancy fees from Novartis, Arla Foods AMBA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Neumirna outside the submitted work. EH, ES and TD reports no conflicts of interest. SH has received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. JM received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We aimed to describe clinical and genetic characteristics, lipid-lowering treatment and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes over a long-term follow-up in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)., Methods: SAFEHEART (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cohort Study) is a long-term study in molecularly diagnosed FH. Data analyzed in HoFH were prospectively obtained from 2004 until 2022. ASCVD events, lipid profile and lipid-lowering treatment were determined., Results: Thirty-nine HoFH patients were analyzed. The mean age was 42 ± 20 years and nineteen (49%) were women. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 6,18). Median age at genetic diagnosis was 24 years (IQR 8,42). At enrolment, 33% had ASCVD and 18% had aortic valve disease. Patients with new ASCVD events and aortic valve disease at follow-up were six (15%), and one (3%), respectively. Median untreated LDL-C levels were 555 mg/dL (IQ 413,800), and median LDL-C levels at last follow-up was 122 mg/dL (IQR 91,172). Most patients (92%) were on high intensity statins and ezetimibe, 28% with PCSK9i, 26% with lomitapide, and 23% with lipoprotein-apheresis. Fourteen patients (36%) attained an LDL-C level below 100 mg/dL, and 10% attained an LDL-C below 70 mg/dL in secondary prevention. Patients with null/null variants were youngers, had higher untreated LDL-C and had the first ASCVD event earlier. Free-event survival is longer in patients with defective variant compared with those patients with at least one null variant (p=0.02)., Conclusions: HoFH is a severe life threating disease with a high genetic and phenotypic variability. The improvement in lipid-lowering treatment and LDL-C levels have contributed to reduce ASCVD events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RA reports personal fees and non-financial support from Tecnofarma Chile, NovoNordisk Chile, and personal fees from Novartis Chile, Amgen Spain, and Teva Chile, outside the submitted work. JLDD received honoraria for research activities from Merck Sharp and Dhome Spain, Amgen Spain, and Sanofi Spain. PM, received research grants from Amgen USA and Sanofi Spain., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Whether the effect of a combination strategy rather than increasing doses of one drug to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is consistent across baseline LDL-C levels remains uncertain., Methods: In the RACING trial, which showed a non-inferiority of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg) to high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) for the primary outcome (3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular event, or stroke), the heterogeneity in treatment effect according to baseline LDL-C levels was assessed for the primary and secondary outcomes (clinical efficacy and safety)., Results: Of 3780 participants, 2817 participants (74.5%) had LDL-C <100 mg/dL, and 963 participants (25.5%) had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. The treatment effect of combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar among the lower LDL-C subset (8.8% vs. 10.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.08, p = 0.19) and the higher LDL-C subset (10.8% vs. 9.6 %; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.7, p = 0.53) without a significant interaction (interaction p = 0.22). Of the secondary outcomes, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL was greater in the combination therapy group regardless of baseline LDL-C levels., Conclusions: Among ASCVD patients, there was no heterogeneity in the effect of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy in the higher and lower baseline LDL-C levels for the 3-year composite of cardiovascular outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Byeong-Keuk Kim has received speaker's fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular, Myeong-Ki Hong has received speaker's fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Pfizer, Yangsoo Jang has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi, and Jung-Sun Kim has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Despite lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reaching LDL-C targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains challenging. Our aim was to determine attainment of LDL-C target levels and reasons for not reaching these in female and male FH patients., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of heterozygous FH patients in five hospitals in the Netherlands and Norway. Clinical characteristics and information about LLT, lipid levels and reasons for not being on LDL-C treatment target were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records., Results: We studied 3178 FH patients (53.9% women), median age 48.0 (IQR 34.0-59.9) years. Median LDL-C before treatment and on-treatment was higher in women compared to men (6.2 (IQR 5.1-7.3) and 6.0 (IQR 4.9-7.2) mmol/l (p=0.005) and 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.8) and 2.8 (IQR 2.3-3.5) mmol/L (p<0.001)), respectively. A minority of women (26.9%) and men (28.9%) reached LDL-C target. In patients with CVD, 17.2% of women and 25.8% of men reached LDL-C target. Women received less often high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Most common reported reasons for not achieving the LDL-C target were insufficient effect of maximum LLT (women 17.3%, men 24.3%) and side effects (women 15.2%, men 8.6%)., Conclusions: In routine practice, only a minority of women and men with FH achieved their LDL-C treatment target. Extra efforts have to be made to provide FH patients with reliable information on the safety of statins and their long-term effects on CVD risk reduction. If statin treatment is insufficient, alternative lipid lowering therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9-inhibitors should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to understand the impact of physicians' perception about LDL-cholesterol (LDLc) control on the management of patients with dyslipidemia in Spain., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional and multicenter study, in which 435 healthcare professionals participated in face-to-face meetings, collecting qualitative and quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia management. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 patients with hypercholesterolemia attended by each physician were collected., Results: A total of 4,010 patients (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular [CV] risk) were included. Physicians' perception was that 62% of their patients attained LDLc goals (66%, 63%, 61% and 56%, for low, moderate, high and very high CV risk, respectively). However, when looking into the data only 31% (vs 62% p<0.01) of patients attained the LDLc goals (47%, 36%, 22% and 25%, respectively). Overall, 33% of patients were taking high intensity statins, 32% statin/ezetimibe, 21% low/moderate intensity statins and 4% PCSK9 inhibitors. These numbers were 38%, 45%, 8% and 6% for very high risk patients and 44%, 21%, 21% and 4% for high CV risk patients. In 32% of patients, a change in lipid lowering therapy was performed after the visit, mainly combining statins/ezetimibe (55%)., Conclusions: In Spain, most patients with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals because of an insufficient intensification of lipid lowering therapy. On the one hand, this is in part due to physicians misperception on preventive LDLc control and the need for repeated advice to patient, and, on the other, to the lack of patient adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Juan Cosin-Sales: has received conference fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi and Sanofi; has participated in advisory services for Almirall, Amgen, MSD and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Amgen, Ferrer, MSD and Sanofi. Raquel Campuzano: has received conference fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. José Luis Díaz: has received fees for presentations, advisory services or scientific collaborations from Amgen, Bayer, Boëringher, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Rovi, Rubió, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier. Carlos Escobar: has received fees for conferences/advisory services from: Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi, Sanofi, Servier and Viatris. María Rosa Fernández: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and Rovi; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin. Juan José Gómez-Doblas: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and MSD; has participated in advisory services for Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer and Daiichi-Sankyo. José María Mostaza: has participated in advisory services and/or conferences, or has carried out projects for Pfizer, Amarin, Ferrer, Sanofi, Amgen, Alter, Servier, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo. Juan Pedro-Botet: has received fees for conferences from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi and Viatris; and has participated in advisory services for Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, Sanofi and Viatris. Núria Plana: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo Mylan and Alexion. Pedro Valdivielso: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Amarin, Akcea, Sobi, MSD, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo; has participated in advisory services for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Sanofi, Akcea and Amarin; and has received research grants from Ferrer and Akcea., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: This study aimed to elucidate whether high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) at 3-month follow-up for patients receiving contemporary lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could predict cardiac events., Methods: The HIJ-PROPER study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial comparing intensive lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin + ezetimibe) and conventional lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin monotherapy) after ACS. The entire cohort was divided into three groups according to tertiles of HDL-C levels at 3-month follow-up (Group 1, HDL-C ≤43 mg/dL; Group 2, HDL-C >43, <53.6 mg/dL; Group 3; HDL-C ≥53.6 mg/dL). Baseline characteristics and incidence of the primary endpoint (a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina pectoris, or ischemia-driven revascularization) were compared among the three groups., Results: The primary endpoint event occurred in 34.8%, 30.1%, and 24.6% of patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and its incidence was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.9; p = 0.001). Irrespective of the treatment regimen, Group 1 had significantly higher rates of the primary endpoint than Group 3 (pitavastatin + ezetimibe therapy: HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.12-2.22; p = 0.01 and pitavastatin monotherapy: HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.98; p = 0.02). These trends remained even after adjustment for baseline characteristics and lipid profiles. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower body mass index, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, higher levels of high-sensitivity C reactive protein at baseline, and lower levels of HDL-C at 3-month follow-up were independent predictors of the incidence of primary endpoint., Conclusions: Lower levels of HDL-C at 3-month follow-up are independently associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events in ACS patients receiving contemporary lipid-lowering therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have the following disclosures: all members of the HIJ-PROPER study group have received research support to perform clinical trials from the Japan Research Promotion Society for Cardiovascular Diseases, which is sponsored by Abbott Vascular Japan Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Boston Scientific Corporation, Bristol-Myers K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi K.K., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. NH reports honoraria from Bristol-Myers K.K. and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., and grants from Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. JY belongs to the Clinical Research Division for Cardiovascular Catheter Intervention, which is financially maintained by donations from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Terumo. The HIJ-PROPER Steering Committee had full access to all data of the present study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to assess the disease burden and to study the molecular genetic characteristics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) patients within the Uzbek population to develop a program of early disease detection and effective treatment measures., Methods: 201 patients were included in the study, of whom 57 with chronic stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and HeFH, and 144 with SCAD without HeFH belonging to the control group, and divided into two subgroups: A, statin free before the study (n = 63) and B (n = 81), who took statin outpatiently. We applied the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (DLCN) to diagnose HeFH. Serum level of PCSK-9 was measured with the ELISA Kit. The genetic typing at PCSK9 E670G (rs505151) polymorphism was performed with the PCR-RFLP method., Results: Underestimation of early lipid studies and inadequate treatment in HeHF patients within the Uzbek population are accompanied by a 1.8-time increase of more frequent history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.05), a 3-time stroke (p < 0.05) and 2-time percutaneous coronary intervention (p < 0.05). The study of genotypes and alleles of PCSK9 E670G (rs505151) polymorphism allowed to state that сarriage of the «damaging » allele G in SCAD and HeHF patients was 2 times higher (11.4%), than in non HeHF (6.0%) and 3 times (3.0%) than in healthy ones, but the differences were not significant. Herewith, G-carriership is accompanied by a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (p < 0.05) and stroke (p < 0.05), coronary artery bypass grafting in anamnesis (p < 0.001), and number of plaques in carotids (p < 0.05). In group I of SCAD patients with HeFH, 18 (31.6%) cases of diabetes mellitus were observed, which did not exceed their number in group II (48, 33.3%). However, most of them were carriers of the G allele (82.0%, p < 0.001). Despite treatment with rosuvastatin 20-40 mg/day, in HeHF patients after 3 months, the level of total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and LDL-C (p < 0.001) was significantly higher than in the control group., Conclusions: Improvement of early diagnosis of FH, including genetic confirmation, and preventional high-intensity statin therapy or a combination of statins with ezetimibe to achieve the target level of LDL-C, is the closest tactical objective for prevention of MACE within the Uzbek population., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder resulting from mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in the metabolism of low density lipoproteins (LDL) and characterized by premature cardiovascular disease due to the exposure to high levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth. Thus, the early identification of FH subjects, followed by appropriate treatment is essential to prevent or at least delay the onset of cardiovascular events. However, FH is largely underdiagnosed; in addition, FH patients are frequently not adequately treated, despite the availability of several pharmacological therapies to significantly reduce LDL-C levels. Current guidelines recommend LDL-C targets for FH (either heterozygotes [HeFH] or homozygotes [HoFH]) <100 mg/dL (<2.6 mmol/L) for adults or <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L) for adults with CHD or diabetes, and <135 mg/dL (<3.5 mmol/L) for children. With the pharmacological options now available, which include statins as a first approach, ezetimibe, and the recently approved monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9, the guideline recommended LDL-C target levels can be achieved in the majority of heterozygous FH subjects, while for the most severe forms of homozygous FH, the addition of therapies such as lomitapide either with or without apheresis may be required., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Patients with hyperlipidemia who are unable to tolerate optimal statin therapy are at increased cardiovascular risk due to ongoing elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The objective of CLEAR Tranquility (NCT03001076) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid when added to background lipid-modifying therapy in patients with a history of statin intolerance who require additional LDL-C lowering., Methods: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with a history of statin intolerance and an LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL while on stable lipid-modifying therapy. After a 4-week ezetimibe 10 mg/day run-in period, patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with bempedoic acid 180 mg or placebo once daily added to ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C., Results: The study population comprised 269 patients (181 bempedoic acid, 88 placebo). Bempedoic acid added to background lipid-modifying therapy that included ezetimibe reduced LDL-C by 28.5% more than placebo (p < 0.001; -23.5% bempedoic acid, +5.0% placebo). Significant reductions in secondary endpoints, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-23.6%), total cholesterol (-18.0%), apolipoprotein B (-19.3%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-31.0%), were observed with bempedoic acid vs. placebo (p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid was well tolerated; rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, muscle-related adverse events, and discontinuations were similar in the bempedoic acid and placebo treatment groups., Conclusions: Bempedoic acid may provide an oral therapeutic option complementary to ezetimibe in statin intolerant patients who require additional LDL-C lowering., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Despite the high prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and available effective lipid-lowering therapy, most of the individuals with this disorder remain undiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of the PLANET registry was to assess the real-life attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic target level in patients with heterozygous FH, to characterize prescribed lipid-lowering therapy with assessment of its efficiency according to the attainment of the target LDL-C level, and to characterize cardiovascular events observed in this patient population again in relation to LDL-C target level attainment., Methods: PLANET registry was designed as a non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional, multicentre disease registry for adult patients with heterozygous FH in the Czech Republic and Slovakia., Results: Overall, 1755 patients were enrolled at 32 sites specialized in FH treatment. 15.4% of patients attained the target LDL-C value. The proportion of patients with LDL-C goal achievement increased to 17.3% in the subgroup of patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy (54.6% of study population). Out of 55 patients receiving inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), 61.8% reached the LDL-C treatment goal. Of all cardiovascular events reported, 14.0% occurred in patients attaining the LDL-C goal, while it was 86.0% in the not-at-target group. It was documented (p=0.004) that the longer is the patient in care at the specialized FH centre, the higher is the probability that he/she will attain the target LDL-C level., Conclusions: Although target LDL-C level attainment remains relatively low, the likelihood of LDL-C goal attainment increases with duration of specialized care., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by markedly increased LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). LDL-C lowering is the cornerstone of therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate LDL-C target achievement and explore reasons for not reaching target in FH patients attending a public-sector lipid clinic at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa., Methods: We reviewed clinical records of patients with genetically confirmed heterozygous FH (heFH) retrospectively. For patients seen after 2013, when new guidelines were published, we determined reasons for use of submaximal therapy., Results: Our study population consisted of 776 adult heFH patients. A substantial proportion (41%) of those younger than 50 years of age had already experienced a cardiovascular event. The mean (±SD) untreated and best achieved LDL-C values during follow up were 8.1 ± 2.1 and 4.0 ± 1.5 mmol/l, respectively. Despite a mean LDL-C reduction of 50%, only 140 (25%) achieved an LDL-C ≤ 3.0 mmol/l. Of the 164 participants with follow up after 2013, 42 did not reach LDL-C < 3.0 mmol/l and did not use maximal therapy (26%). The commonest reasons for not using maximum therapy were statin side-effects (n = 15, 36%) and acceptance by the patient (n = 9, 22%) or the physician (n = 8, 19%) of the control achieved., Conclusions: The heFH population in Cape Town is characterized by high baseline LDL-C, a high prevalence of CVD at presentation and low rates of achieving an LDL-C target of 3.0 mmol/l., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Maximal doses of potent statins are the cornerstone of treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Despite this, a substantial proportion of FH patients are either under-treated or not treated at all. The aim of this work was to evaluate, in a retrospective study, the treatment of FH patients, the proportion of FH patients reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, and reasons for not reaching LDL-C goals, in 8 lipid clinics in Slovakia dealing with FH patients., Methods: 201 heterozygous FH patients (50.8 ± 14.9 years, 55% females) who attended the lipid clinics at least three times were included in the study., Results: At the first visit, 31.3% of patients were treated with statins and the most common dose was 20 mg of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin. At the third visit, 78.1% of patients were treated with statins and 24.4% with ezetimibe. The majority of patients were treated with atorvastatin (75.8%) and rosuvastatin (18.5%) and 31.3% of all patients were treated with atorvastatin 80 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg with/without ezetimibe. However, only 11.9% of patients with the LDL-C goal level <2.5 mmol/l and 6.9% with the goal <1.8 mmol/l reached the level. Reasons for not reaching the goal levels were evaluated by physicians in each patient. Insufficient LDL-C lowering effect of treatment, side-effects of therapy and non-compliance of patients were responsible for 46%, 18% and 30% of cases, respectively., Conclusions: Referral of FH patients to lipid clinics in Slovakia leads to improvement in the treatment; however, almost 22% of the patients are still without statin treatment and the majority of patients do not reach the LDL-C goal level., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Aims: The latest guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) proposed a new "extreme-risk" category of patients, for whom a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) is advised. We aimed to identify the proportion of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), who are at extreme cardiovascular (CV) risk, and explore how achievable is the new LDL-C goal., Methods: We enrolled 1629 consecutive patients ≤80 years with stable CAD. Fasting lipids were determined and patients having probable or definite heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) were identified using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network algorithm., Results: The prevalence of risk factors/characteristics suggesting an extreme CV risk were as follows: 32% diabetes mellitus, 33% premature CAD and 9.2% HeFH. In total, 895 (55%) patients had at least one of those risk factors/characteristics and formed the extreme CV risk category. Among patients at extreme risk, 87% were on lipid-lowering therapy, of whom 20.3% had LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) and only 5.3% had LDL-C <55 mg/dL., Conclusions: More than half of all patients with stable CAD are at extreme CV risk and very few (∼5%) achieve LDL-C levels <55 mg/dL. Using maximally-tolerated high-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe, if necessary, is imperative to bridge the treatment gap, while in selected cases the addition of PCSK9 inhibitors will be required., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to examine the effect of serum sitosterol, a cholesterol absorption marker, on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with dyslipidaemia., Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the HIJ-PROPER trial that assesses the effect of aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering treatment with pitavastatin + ezetimibe in 1734 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with dyslipidaemia. Patients were divided into two groups based on sitosterol level at enrolment (cut-off value was 2.2 μg/mL; a median of baseline sitosterol level), and clinical outcomes were examined., Results: The mean LDL-C level after 3 years in the low sitosterol group was 84.8 ± 20.1 mg/dL with pitavastatin-monotherapy and 64.6 ± 20.3 mg/dL with pitavastatin + ezetimibe, while corresponding values in the high sitosterol group were 91.0 ± 22.9 mg/dL and 71.1 ± 23.3 mg/dL, respectively. In the high sitosterol group, the Kaplan-Meier event rate for the primary endpoint at 3 years was 26.0% in the pitavastatin + ezetimibe group, as compared with 34.3% in the pitavastatin-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.91; p = 0.006, p-value for interaction = 0.010). However, in the low sitosterol group, there was no significant reduction of the primary endpoint by pitavastatin + ezetimibe therapy., Conclusions: Aggressive lipid-lowering treatment with ezetimibe had a positive effect on clinical outcomes in the high sitosterol subset of ACS patients with dyslipidaemia, but not in the low sitosterol subset. This effect was independent of LDL-C reduction and suggests that sitosterol measurement on admission in ACS patients might contribute to a "personalised" lipid-lowering approach., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory marker associated with cardiovascular disease. Statins lower both low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and C-reactive protein (CRP), resulting in improved outcomes. However, whether lipid-lowering therapy also lowers suPAR levels is unknown., Methods: We investigated whether treatment with Simvastatin 40 mg and Ezetimibe 10 mg lowered plasma suPAR levels in 1838 patients with mild-moderate, asymptomatic aortic stenosis, included in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study, using a pattern mixture model. A 1-year Cox analysis, adjusted for established cardiovascular risk factors, allocation to study treatment, peak aortic valve velocity and baseline suPAR, was performed to evaluate relationships between change in suPAR with all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events (MCE) composed of ischemic cardiovascular events (ICE) and aortic valve related events (AVE)., Results: After 4.3 years of follow-up, suPAR levels had increased by 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0%-11.5%) in the placebo group, but only by 4.1% (1.9%-6.2%) in the group with lipid-lowering treatment (p<0.001). In a multivariate 1-year analysis, 1-year suPAR was strongly associated with all-cause mortality, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.05 (1.17-3.61); MCE 1.40 (1.01-1.92); and AVE 1.42 (1.02-1.99) (all p<0.042) for each doubling of suPAR; but was not associated with ICE., Conclusions: Simvastatin and Ezetimibe treatment impeded the progression of the time-related increase in plasma suPAR levels. Year-1 suPAR was associated with all-cause mortality, MCE, and AVE irrespective of baseline levels (SEAS study: NCT00092677)., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Phytosterolemia is a rare genetic disease caused by mutation of the ABCG5/8 gene. Our aim was to elucidate the natural history and homeostasis of phytosterolemia., Methods: We analyzed a Hutterite kindred consisting of 21 homozygotes with phytosterolemia assembled over a period of two decades, all of whom carried the ABCG8 S107X mutation and were treated with ezetimibe., Results: Most of these subjects were asymptomatic and devoid of clinical stigmata, and this, since they were ascertained primarily by a process of cascade testing, suggests that, relative to its true prevalence, phytosterolemia is a condition of low morbidity. All subjects have responded well to treatment with ezetimibe. Initial (pre-treatment) and post-ezetimibe levels of cholesterol and sitosterol were measured and percentage changes on ezetimibe were calculated. We found initial levels to be inversely related to subjects' ages as were percentage responses to ezetimibe therapy. There was also a direct correlation between initial levels and percentage responses to ezetimibe. Hence on-treatment levels were very uniform., Conclusions: This evidence of a link with age leads us to propose that an age-related change in cholesterol and sterol homeostasis occurs at puberty in phytosterolemia and that the change is due to high sterol and/or stanol levels causing feedback inhibition of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP-2) processing. This would explain the well-documented phenomenon of depressed cholesterol synthesis in phytosterolemia. It is also well-known that LDL-receptor activity is increased, and this feasibly explains reduced LDL levels and consequent reduction of plasma cholesterol and sitosterol levels. Downregulated SREBP-2 processing would be expected to also lower proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels and this would explain high LDL-receptor activity. The above state could be termed disrupted homeostasis and the alternative, seen mostly in children and characterized by hypercholesterolemia and hypersterolemia, simple homeostasis., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Overt atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) warrants aggressive lipid lowering. Imaging for ambiguous symptoms suggesting ischemia or for clarification of CV risk in asymptomatic individuals often uncovers previously unknown ASCVD. Guidelines do not provide clear recommendations for aggressive lipid lowering in such cases. We explored physicians' perception, as influenced by tests that detect ASCVD, regarding appropriateness of getting to lipid goals and for theoretically accessing proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i)., Methods: A questionnaire was developed including cases of low to high CV risk, chronic kidney disease (CKD) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Each case was considered with or without angina symptoms and, in turn, whether testing identified previously unknown advanced, early/subclinical or no ASCVD. Synthesis of responses was facilitated by using a scale for perceived appropriateness from 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest)., Results: Getting to goal and, if not achieved by statins and/or ezetimibe, accessing PCSK9i was considered appropriate in patients with T2DM with preclinical or advanced ASCVD, patients with moderate or high CV risk and advanced ASCVD, patients with CKD or low CV risk with angina symptoms and advanced ASCVD. For most of the remaining cases adding PCSK9i was considered only possibly appropriate., Conclusions: Physicians' perception of appropriateness for achieving lipid goals, including access to PCSK9i, is markedly influenced by detection of previously unknown ASCVD. Since these commonly encountered scenarios do not clearly meet current indications for PCSK9i, our data identify pressing areas requiring further research., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Severe hypercholesterolemia associated or not with xanthomas in a child may suggest the diagnosis of homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH), autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) or sitosterolemia, depending on the transmission of hypercholesterolemia in the patient's family. Sitosterolemia is a recessive disorder characterized by high plasma levels of cholesterol and plant sterols due to mutations in the ABCG5 or the ABCG8 gene, leading to a loss of function of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) heterodimer transporter G5-G8., Methods: We aimed to perform the molecular characterization of two children with severe primary hypercholesterolemia., Results: Case #1 was a 2 year-old girl with high LDL-cholesterol (690 mg/dl) and tuberous and intertriginous xanthomas. Case #2 was a 7 year-old boy with elevated LDL-C (432 mg/dl) but no xanthomas. In both cases, at least one parent had elevated LDL-cholesterol levels. For the molecular diagnosis, we applied targeted next generation sequencing (NGS), which unexpectedly revealed that both patients were compound heterozygous for nonsense mutations: Case #1 in ABCG5 gene [p.(Gln251*)/p.(Arg446*)] and Case #2 in ABCG8 gene [p.(Ser107*)/p.(Trp361*)]. Both children had extremely high serum sitosterol and campesterol levels, thus confirming the diagnosis of sisterolemia. A low-fat/low-sterol diet was promptly adopted with and without the addition of ezetimibe for Case #1 and Case #2, respectively. In both patients, serum total and LDL-cholesterol decreased dramatically in two months and progressively normalized., Conclusions: Targeted NGS allows the rapid diagnosis of sitosterolemia in children with severe hypercholesterolemia, even though their family history does not unequivocally suggest a recessive transmission of hypercholesterolemia. A timely diagnosis is crucial to avoid delays in treatment., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a high cardiovascular risk condition. Less than 20% of patients achieve the LDL targets. Although PCSK9 inhibitors improve control and reduce cardiovascular events, official recommendations for their use are restrictive. We aim to assess the number of FH patients suitable for PCSK9 inhibition according to the European guidelines., Methods: A total of 2685 FH patients, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, included in the Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society, were sorted according to the intensity of their lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and LDL cholesterol levels achieved. The number of patients who met the recommendations for PCSK9 inhibition treatment according to the European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS), Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society and the European Medicines Agency was calculated., Results: In total, 1573 patients were on high-intensity LLT; 607 were on moderate-intensity statins; 82 were on low-intensity LLT, and 423 were neither on statins nor on ezetimibe in the last visit registered. The mean LDL reduction among those on high-intensity LLT was 54%. Ninety-one percent of patients on high-intensity LLT had an LDL below 5.2 mmol/L, 53% below 3.4 mmol/L, and 23% below 2.6 mmol/L. Only 12% of FH patients with cardiovascular disease achieved 1.8 mmol/L. Despite this, only 17% of patients qualified for PCSK9 inhibition according to ESC/EAS guidelines., Conclusions: For patients with a condition that exposes them to high cardiovascular risk and who have extreme difficulties in achieving LDL targets, wider access to PCSK9 inhibitor therapy is warranted., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Sitosterolemia displays high plasma total sterols [high plant sterols (PS) + normal to high total cholesterol (TC)] with normal to moderately elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. High LDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and increased non-HDL and the ratios of TC and triglycerides (TG) to HDL can increase the risk for atherosclerosis. Ezetimibe (EZE) can reduce plasma PS and TC levels in sitosterolemia, but its effect on lipoprotein subclasses has not been previously reported., Methods: Sitosterolemia patients (n = 8) were taken off EZE for 14 weeks (OFF EZE) and placed on EZE (10 mg/d) for 14 weeks (ON EZE). Serum lipids were measured enzymatically and lipoprotein subclasses were assessed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis., Results: EZE reduced (p < 0.05) total sterols (-12.5 ± 4.1%) and LDL-sterol (-22.7 ± 5.7%) and its sterol mass of large VLDL (-24.4 ± 4.5%), VLDL remnants (-21.1 ± 7.9%) and large IDL (-22.4 ± 7.2%) compared to OFF EZE. EZE did not affect large LDL subclasses or mean LDL particle size (273.8 ± 0.6 vs. 274.6 ± 0.3 Å). EZE increased HDL-sterol (25.5 ± 8.0%, p = 0.008) including intermediate (34 ± 14%, p = 0.02) and large (33 ± 16%, p = 0.06) HDL. EZE reduced non-HDL-sterol (-21.8± 5.0%), total sterols/HDL (-28.2 ± 5.5%) and TG/HDL (-27.4 ± 6.5%, all p < 0.01)., Conclusions: EZE improves VLDL and HDL subfraction distribution, thereby reducing the atherogenic lipid profile, thus providing potential clinical benefit in sitosterolemia beyond TC and PS reduction., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Although dual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy (DLLT) with statin-ezetimibe combination showed clinical benefit in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) confirming "the lower, the better," the underlying mechanisms of DLLT are still unknown., Methods: PRECISE-IVUS trial evaluated the effects of DLLT on IVUS-derived coronary atherosclerosis and lipid profile, compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, quantifying the coronary plaque response in 100 ACS patients. We explored the potential predictors of plaque regression., Results: Lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, remnant-like particles cholesterol, and stronger reduction of small dense LDL-C and cholesterol absorption markers were observed in patients with plaque regression compared to those with progression. Multivariate analysis revealed that achieved LDL-C was the strongest predictor for coronary plaque regression (95% CI: 0.944-1.000, p = 0.05), followed by age (95% CI: 0.994-1.096, p = 0.09)., Conclusions: Incremental LDL-C lowering by DLLT was associated with stronger coronary plaque regression, reconfirming that lowering LDL-C to levels below previous targets provided additional clinical benefit., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cholesterol-lowering therapy has been related with several beneficial effects; however, its influence on oxidative stress and endothelial function is not fully elucidated., Aims: To investigate the effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe on mitochondrial function and leukocyte-endothelium interactions in polymorphonuclear cells of hyperlipidemic patients., Methods: Thirty-nine hyperlipidemic patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one received simvastatin (40 mg/day) and the other received ezetimibe (10 mg/day) for 4 weeks, after which both groups were administered combined therapy for an additional 4-week period. Lipid profile, mitochondrial parameters (oxygen consumption, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and membrane potential), glutathione levels, superoxide dismutase activity, catalase activity and leukocyte/endothelial cell interactions and adhesion molecules -VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin, were evaluated., Results: An improvement in lipid profile was observed after administration of simvastatin or ezetimibe alone (LDLc: -40.2 vs -19.6%, respectively), though this effect was stronger with the former (p < 0.001), and a further reduction was registered when the two were combined (LDLc: -50.7% vs -56.8%, respectively). In addition to this, simvastatin, ezetimibe and simvastatin + ezetimibe significantly increased oxygen consumption, membrane potential and glutathione content, and decreased levels of ROS, thereby improving mitochondrial function. Furthermore, simvastatin + ezetimibe increased catalase activity. In addition, simvastatin and simvastatin/ezetimibe improved leukocyte/endothelium interactions by decreasing leukocyte rolling and adhesion and increasing leukocyte rolling velocity. Finally, simvastatin, ezetimibe and simvastatin + ezetimibe reduced levels of the adhesion molecule ICAM-1, and ezetimibe + simvastatin significantly decreased levels of E-selectin., Conclusion: Co-administration of simvastatin and ezetimibe has an additive cholesterol-lowering effect and beneficial consequences for mitochondrial function and leukocyte/endothelium interactions in leukocytes of hypercholesterolemic patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Strategies to reduce LDL-cholesterol involve reductions in cholesterol synthesis or absorption. We identified a familial hypercholesterolemia patient with an exceptional response to the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe. Niemann-Pick C 1-like 1 (NPC1L1) is the molecular target of ezetimibe., Methods and Results: Sequencing identified nucleotide changes predicted to change amino acids 52 (L52P), 300 (I300T) and 489 (S489G) in exceptional NPC1L1. In silico analyses identified increased stability and cholesterol binding affinity in L52P-NPC1L1 versus WT-NPC1L1. HEK293 cells overexpressing WT-NPC1L1 or NPC1L1 harboring amino acid changes singly or in combination (Comb-NPC1L1) had reduced cholesterol uptake in Comb-NPC1L1 when ezetimibe was present. Cholesterol uptake was reduced by ezetimibe in L52P-NPC1L1, I300T-NPC1L1, but increased in S489G-NPC1L1 overexpressing cells. Immunolocalization studies found preferential plasma membrane localization of mutant NPC1L1 independent of ezetimibe. Flotillin 1 and 2 expression was reduced and binding to Comb-NPC1L1 was reduced independent of ezetimibe exposure. Proteomic analyses identified increased association with proteins that modulate intermediate filament proteins in Comb-NPC1L1 versus WT-NPC1L1 treated with ezetimibe., Conclusion: This is the first detailed analysis of the role of NPC1L1 mutations in an exceptional responder to ezetimibe. The results point to a complex set of events in which the combined mutations were shown to affect cholesterol uptake in the presence of ezetimibe. Proteomic analysis suggests that the exceptional response may also lie in the nature of interactions with cytosolic proteins., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In this review, we discuss the screening and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an autosomal dominant inherited disease, characterized by severely increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk for premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Genetic family based cascade screening for FH was shown to be cost-effective and a screening program with such an approach was carried out in the Netherlands from 1994 to 2014. Over 64,000 persons have participated in this program of whom 40.3% were found to carry an FH causing mutation. We will discuss the results of this screening program, as well as the scientific opportunities it has provided. Currently, statins and ezetimibe are the only registered LDL-C lowering treatment options for FH patients. Many of them do not attain the treatment goals that are recommended by treatment guidelines. In this review, we will also provide a comprehensive overview of promising new modalities that could lower LDL-C in FH patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We compared the variability of LDL-C-lowering responses to treatment with ezetimibe + statins versus statins in hypercholesterolemic patients., Methods: An analysis of patient-level data pooled from 27 double-blind, placebo and/or active-controlled studies in 21,671 patients treated with ezetimibe + statins versus statins on first-line (statin-naïve/wash-out) or second-line (on statin, randomized to ezetimibe versus placebo [add-on] or ezetimibe versus uptitrated statin [uptitrate]) for 6-24 wks. Variances (standard deviation [SD], coefficient of variation [CV], and root mean squared error [RMSE] adjusted for various factors) for % change from baseline in LDL-C were compared., Results: In first-line and second-line add-on studies, the variability (SD, RMSE) of % change from baseline in LDL-C was lower in ezetimibe + statin-treated patients versus statin-treated patients, ±covariates. Differences were small but statistically significant due to the large sample size. In second-line uptitrate studies, ezetimibe + statin treatment resulted in greater unadjusted variability (SD) versus statin therapy, while the adjusted variability (RMSE) was significantly lower. Relative variability (CV=SD/mean) was lower for ezetimibe + statins versus statin therapy for all study types, being more pronounced in second-line add-on and uptitrate studies, attributed to larger mean LDL-C reductions for ezetimibe + statins versus statin groups. When assessed by individual study/type, statin brand, potency or dose, the CVs remained lower for ezetimibe + statins versus statins in second-line studies. The SDs showed no consistent trend for either therapy., Conclusion: In hypercholesterolemic patients, the absolute variability of LDL-C-lowering responses to ezetimibe + statins was not greater versus statins alone and appeared lower when adjusted for other factors. Relative variability was lower in patients treated with statins + ezetimibe. A better understanding of the variability of the LDL-C lowering response may help guide clinicians in making therapeutic decisions., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)