Search

Ground-based, all-sky astronomical surveys are imposed with an inevitable day–night cadence that can introduce aliases in period-finding methods. We examined four different methods — three from the literature and a new one that we developed — that remove aliases to improve the accuracy of period-finding algorithms. We investigate the effectiveness of these methods in decreasing the fraction of aliased period solutions by applying them to the ZTF and the SSPDB asteroid datasets. We find that the VanderPlas method had the worst accuracy for each survey. The mask and our newly proposed window method yields the highest accuracy when averaged across both datasets. However, the Monte Carlo method had the highest accuracy for the ZTF dataset, while for SSPDB, it had lower accuracy than the baseline where none of these methods are applied. Where possible, detailed de-aliasing studies should be carried out for every survey with a unique cadence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using Hyper Suprime Camera data (a precursor of what is to come with Rubin Observatory) we assess trail masking mitigation strategies for satellite contamination. We examine HSC data of the Hubble COSMOS field where satellite trails have been identified by eye. Exercising the current LSST Science Pipelines on this data, we study the efficacy of masking satellite trails which appear in single visit exposures before they are assembled into a coadded frame. We find that the current routines largely mask satellite trails in single visits, but miss the extended low surface brightness features of the satellite trails. For a sufficiently wide mask, these faint features appear at a less significant level in the final coadd, as they are averaged down in a stack of tens of exposures. We study this print-through vs mask width. In this note, we describe some of the challenges we encountered in that effort, prospects for more complete removal of the low surface brightness tails of the masked trails, and possible science impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]