Search

Objective: Fournier's gangrene is a rare but life-threatening infection disease with high mortality rate. The quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a new and simpler scoring system that may identify patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk for a poor outcome. The purpose of this study was to find out role of qSOFA in determining prognosis of Fournier's gangrene patients., Methods: This study is a case control with retrospective review of Fournier's gangrene patients treated at Hasan Sadikin Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 who met inclusion criteria. Participants were divided into two groups according to qSOFA score as high qSOFA (2-3) and low qSOFA (0-1)., Results: From 69 patients, the mortality rate was 24.6%. The sensitivity of qSOFA score to predict mortality was 88.2%; the specificity was 94.2%; positive predictive value was 83.3%; negative predictive value was 96.1%; positive likelihood ratio was 15.2; negative likelihood ratio was 0.12; and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of qSOFA was 94.2%. There was significant association between qSOFA scale and mortality with p -value of 0.0001. The qSOFA score has strong positive correlation with Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index ( p <0.0001, r =0.704)., Conclusion: qSOFA scoring system has a high prognostic value and can be used to determine prognosis of Fournier's gangrene patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To explore the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the training experiences of urology residents in Indonesia., Methods: A cross-sectional study using a web-based questionnaire (SurveyMonkey) involved all registered urology residents in Indonesia. The questionnaire was structured in Bahasa Indonesia, composed of 28 questions, and divided into three sections: demographic characteristics, current daily activities, and opinions regarding training experiences during the COVID-19 outbreak. The survey was distributed to all respondents via chief of residents in each urology center from May 26, 2020 to Jun 2, 2020., Results: Of the total 247 registered urology residents, 243 were eligible for the study. The response and completeness rate for this study were 243/243 (100%). The median age of respondents was 30 (range: 24-38) years old, and 92.2% of them were male. Among them, 6 (2.5%) respondents were confirmed as COVID-19 positive. A decrease in residents' involvement in clinical and surgical activities was distinguishable in endourological and open procedures. Most educational activities were switched to web-based video conferences, while others opted for the in-person method. Smart learning methods, such as joining a national or international speaker webinar or watching a recorded video, were used by 93.8% and 80.7% of the respondents, respectively. The respondents thought that educational activities using web-based video conferences and smart learning methods were effective methods of learning. Overall, the respondents felt unsure whether training experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic were comparable to the respective period before., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected urology residents' training experiences. However, it also opened up new possibilities for incorporating new learning methodologies in the future., Competing Interests: All authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2021 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.)