Search

The use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have markedly improved outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). The HeartWare LVAD is a miniaturized centrifugal pump implanted within the pericardial space. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are susceptible to oversensing of extracardiac signals (electromagnetic interference [EMI]). We report two cases of EMI in patients that received a HeartWare LVAD as destination therapy for advanced HF. The patients were 75 and 78 years old, both with severe ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction < 0.20) and New York Heart Association class 4 heart failure. Both patients had a St. Jude Medical Unify ICD with a 7 Fr dual coil St. Jude Medical Durata ICD lead. In both patients, the lead location was in the right ventricular apex with an inferior orientation. Both patients experienced immediate ICD therapies after LVAD placement, requiring the tachytherapies to be disabled. ICD programming changes to increase sensitivity and the detection windows were ineffective. Both patients underwent ICD system revision. In one patient, the existing lead was moved to an anteroseptal location that stopped the EMI. In the other patient, the ICD system was changed to allow a separate right ventricular sensing lead in an anteroseptal location and a dual coil ICD lead placed in an apical location, a strategy used to obtain an acceptable defibrillation threshold. The patients have had no subsequent EMI detected on clinical and remote monitoring. Patients with a right ventricular apical ICD lead placement that undergo placement of a HeartWare LVAD are susceptible to EMI and inappropriate ICD therapies. These cases suggest the primary mechanism is proximity of the ICD lead to the device and as such relocation to an anteroseptal location can overcome the problem. These data suggest that all patients that receive a HeartWare LVAD with an ICD should have the device carefully checked at maximum LVAD output to determine if EMI may be present. ASAIO Journal 2013;59:136-139. Key Words: left ventricular assist device, electromagnetic interference, improper ICD shocks, end-stage heart failure.

Patients increasingly require longer durations of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Despite a recent trend toward continuous flow VADs, the HeartMate XVE is still commonly used, but its longevity remains a significant limitation. Existing surveillance methods of pump failure often give inconclusive results. XVE electrical current waveforms were collected regularly (2001-2008) and sorted into quartiles according to number of days until pump failure (Q1, 0-34; Q2, 34-160; Q3, 160-300; and Q4, 300-390 days). Thoratec waveform files were converted into text files. The 10-second electrical current, voltage waveform was identified and isolated for analysis. Waveforms were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and with a fast Fourier transform. Quartiles were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Waveforms (n = 454) were collected for 21 patients with failed pumps. An artificial neural network was used to predict pump failure within 30 days from the waveform characteristics identified though signal processing.

Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have demonstrated clinical success in both the bridge-to-transplantation and destination-therapy patient populations; however, infection remains one of the most common causes of mortality during mechanical circulatory support. Thus, serious LVAD infections may negate the benefits of LVAD implantation, resulting in decreased quality of life, increased morbidity and mortality, and increased costs associated with implantation. Prevention of device-related infection is crucial to the cost-effective use of mechanical circulatory support devices. Therefore, adherence to evidence-based infection control and prevention guidelines, meticulous surgical technique and optimal postoperative surgical site care form the foundation for LVAD associated infection prevention.