Search

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder is commonly used for evaluating muscle bulk and fatty degeneration, as well as tendon tear size, geometry, retraction, and length. However, MRI can also be used to evaluate tendon quality. Increased rotator cuff tendon signal on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI appears to be a marker of tendon degeneration and potentially of impaired healing potential. Tendon signal intensity merits closer attention and may be especially relevant when selecting chronic degenerative tears for repair in patients with other risk factors for nonhealing., Competing Interests: Disclosures The author declares the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: S.S.H. is a board or committee member of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; receives other financial or material support from Arthrex, DePuy (A Johnson & Johnson Company), and Enovis; is on the editorial or governing board of Arthroscopy and Orthopedics Today; owns stock or stock options in Band Connect, Kaliber AI, Restor3D, and ROMTech; receives intellectual property royalties from Enovis; is a paid consultant for Enovis, Restor3D, Smith & Nephew, and Stryker; and receives publishing royalties and financial or material support from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American volume)., (Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Elbow arthroscopy enables surgeons to treat a vast range of elbow injuries and pathologies in a minimally invasive manner. It has a lower morbidity rate and is often followed by a faster recovery than traditional open surgery unless it is followed by a serious complication. Although most complications are minor and transient, the incidence of both minor and major complications is considerably higher than that after arthroscopy of other joints, specifically the risk of neurovascular injury including permanent nerve injury because of the proximity of neurovascular structures. A recent review of 114 studies reported a median 3% incidence of complications and 2% incidence of reoperation, with transient nerve palsies accounting for about one third. Surgeon experience may influence complication rates; a survey suggested that surgeons need to experience more than 200 cases to be considered expert. In addition, patient-related factors such as obesity, female gender, age over 65 years, elevated blood sugar levels, hypercoagulable disorder, tobacco or alcohol use or both, as well as history of previous surgery and perioperative corticosteroid injections are identified as risk factors for complications after elbow arthroscopy. Keys to avoiding complications include precise surgical indications and understanding the 3-dimensional anatomy-especially the relationship of the various nerves to the portals and joint capsule., (Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has fallen into disrepute, and the numbers performed appear to be on the decline because it is technically demanding and time-consuming, requires a long postoperative recovery, and does not always heal or function as expected. In addition, two "new kids on the block," the subacromial balloon spacer and the lower trapezius tendon transfer, have emerged as viable alternatives for low-demand patients who cannot tolerate a lengthy recovery and for high-demand patients who lack external rotation strength, respectively. However, carefully selected patients continue to do well after SCR, when surgery is meticulously performed using a graft that is sufficiently thick and stiff. The clinical results and healing rates after SCR using allograft tensor fascia lata are comparable with those after SCR using tensor fascia lata autograft and without donor-site morbidity. Robust comparative clinical study is needed to sort out the optimal graft type and thickness for SCR and the precise indications for each of the surgical treatment options for the irreparable rotator cuff tear, but let's not "throw the baby out with the bathwater" and abandon SCR altogether., (Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The current diagnostic and treatment strategies for anterior glenohumeral instability have been refined by high-quality clinical and basic science studies, but many controversies remain. These include the bone loss threshold for arthroscopic Bankart repair and the influence of other clinical factors on this decision, the optimal bracing position following anterior glenohumeral dislocation, and the optimal coracoid graft orientation during the Latarjet procedure. Randomized clinical trials often present conflicting results, and many of these are small-sample and fragile studies. Obtaining an expert consensus on the topic, by means of the Delphi method, is an attractive alternative to such clinical trials. Several studies employing variations of the Delphi method have addressed the diagnosis and treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability. These have stressed the importance of a meticulous technique during arthroscopic Bankart repair and of recognition of glenoid and humeral bone loss and treating this appropriately. These studies have also helped identify areas where consensus is modest or lacking to motivate additional clinical research study., (Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rotator cuff repair is performed to effect healing of the enthesis; to restore shoulder comfort, strength, and function; to prevent tear propagation; and to prevent progression of atrophic muscle changes (fatty degeneration, fatty infiltration, and fatty atrophy) that eventually occur. Non-retracted and moderately retracted rotator cuff tears usually heal after repair, and muscle atrophy may recover over time. It follows that early rotator cuff repair is beneficial for many patients with chronic but reparable rotator cuff tears. Diagnostic ultrasound can provide quantitative information about the recovery of both muscle and tendon and represents a viable alternative to magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating healing after rotator cuff repair., (Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair strategies have evolved over 3 decades, but suture anchor design, anchor configuration, and stitches have been largely driven by repair biomechanics. In recent years there has been a shift toward repair strategies that enhance the biology of tendon repair. Double-row and transosseous equivalent suture anchor repair constructs demonstrate excellent time zero mechanical properties, but the resulting increased repair tension and tendon compression may compromise tendon healing. Modern single-row repairs employing medialized triple-loaded suture anchors, simple stitches, and lateral marrow venting avoid some of the problems associated with double-row repairs and demonstrate excellent short-term healing and clinical results. The most robust repair fails if the tendon does not heal. Biology and biomechanics must be carefully balanced., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has undergone extensive biomechanical and clinical study. Systematic review of biomechanical studies has shown that SCR functions to depress the humeral head and improve the glenohumeral register, which provides proof of concept. Clinical studies have shown the short-term effectiveness of SCR, but this is influenced by graft type and thickness, as well as surgical technique. These studies are mostly flawed because follow-up is brief, postoperative imaging is often lacking, and the results may not be generalizable. Multiple systematic reviews pooling the results of these various clinical studies have mostly produced diluted conclusions that are not clinically helpful. To date, there is a dearth of comparative studies to help guide the selection of SCR over other treatment options such as subacromial balloon spacer, partial repair with or without augmentation, tendon transfer, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, or even continued nonoperative care. Additionally, SCR is a salvage operation rather than an expedient alternative to careful mobilization of a rotator cuff tear for primary repair. Ultimately, large-scale, long-term imaging-based comparative clinical studies, rather than additional systematic clinical or biomechanical reviews, must provide the evidence needed to determine the precise indications and optimal technique for SCR., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The classic and congruent-arc Latarjet techniques are equally safe and effective in restoring glenohumeral stability, even when performed as a revision of a failed stabilization. The classic technique provides a broader contact area for healing and facilitates and improves screw fixation. The congruent-arc technique theoretically optimizes glenohumeral contact forces because of the matched radius of curvature, provides better restoration of glenoid depth, and restores larger glenoid defects. However, rotating the coracoid graft for the congruent-arc technique eliminates the possibility of imbricating the coracoacromial ligament stump to the capsule. Surgeons have little reason to change from one technique to the other; both techniques result in successful outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)