Search

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and graft maturation following posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with preserved remnant and further analyze the correlated factors affecting graft maturation.Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral single-bundle PCLR with remnant preservation from January 2011 to October 2014 by the same senior doctor using tibialis anterior allografts and same surgical technique were included. At a follow-up of more than 2 years, range of motion (ROM) and posterior laxity assessed by posterior drawer test and the KT-1000 arthrometer were examined. Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were evaluated. The graft maturation was assessed by a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. Overall correlation analyses and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify correlated factors of graft maturation, and then subgroups were divided and analyzed according to significant risk factor.Forty-three (84.3%) of 51 enrolled patients were successfully followed up (38.4 months, 24-54 months). All clinical scores improved significantly, and there were no complications. The results of KT-1000 difference revealed significant decline of posterior laxity (9.4 ± 1.5 vs 2.2 ± 1.5 mm; P.001). The MRI evaluation confirmed no ligament retears. Both correlation and regression analyses showed time from injury to surgery had a positive, statistically significant weak correlation with the signal intensity score (R = 0.38, P = .012; coefficient = 0.10; P = .036). Subgroup (group 1: time from injury to surgery3 months; group 2: 3-6 months; group 3: 6-12 months; group 4: ≥12 months) analysis showed there were no significant differences of clinical outcomes between subgroups, while MRI signal intensity was significantly lower in the group with shorter time from injury to surgery (P = .02).The remnant-preserved PCLR resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes and graft maturation at a mean follow-up of 38.4 months. The time from injury to surgery showed a weak positive correlation with postoperative graft signal intensity on MRI.Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Purpose In this study, we compared femoral tunnel pairs that differ by group in a double-bundle Achilles tendon allograft posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Methods Group 1 patients had femoral tunnels drilled nearly within the footprint area most proximal and most distal to the axis of the femur. Group 2 patients had femoral tunnels drilled eccentrically within the footprint along an axis nearly perpendicular to the axis of the femur. Patient assessments were made subjectively with preoperative and postoperative assessments of Lysholm rating scale, posterior drawer test, and dial test. Objective assessments used range of motion and quadriceps circumference. Group 1 contained 7 patients with a mean age of 32 years (range, 20 to 46 years). Group 2 contained 10 patients with a mean age of 32 years (range, 20 to 46 years). Results Group 2 patients had significantly less posterior laxity than group 1 patients. Postoperatively, 6 patients in group 1 (86%) had a positive posterior drawer test compared with 3 in group 2 (30%). Rotational laxity was identified by dial test results postoperatively in 3 patients in group 1 (43%) compared with 0% in group 2. Extension deficit occurred in 2 patients in group 1 (29%) and 1 patient in group 2 (10%). Flexion deficit occurred more than twice as frequently in group 1 (71% [5 patients]) than in group 2 (30% [3 patients]). There were no statistically significant differences for other comparisons. Conclusions The clinical outcomes support the group 2 method with femoral tunnel placement at the anterior-most and posterior-most portions of the femoral PCL insertion. The group 2 procedure described in this study incorporates advanced principles for successful outcomes with Achilles double-bundle PCL reconstruction. Level of Evidence Level III, case-control study.