Search

Purpose To evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes after arthroscopic operative fixation of tibial spine fractures in pediatric patients, to determine the incidence of further ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries, and to describe associated meniscal pathology and intraoperative findings at the time of tibial spine repair. Methods All patients under age 18 with a tibial spine fracture treated arthroscopically at 1 institution by 2 surgeons from 2008 through 2019 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients at least 1 year from their date of surgery were contacted to complete a questionnaire, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Questions pertained to knee function, pain, and further injury or surgery on either knee. Patient charts, preoperative imaging, and operative reports were reviewed to determine demographic information, tibial spine fracture type, concomitant injuries, and intraoperative details. Results Sixty-six of 97 eligible patients (68%) completed questionnaires. Average age at initial surgery was 10.7 years (range, 4-17). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-11.9). Average IKDC score at follow-up was 91.4 (range, 62.1-100). Patients reported their knee as 92% of “normal” (range, 40-100). Thirty-five (53%) currently participate in sport; 6 (9%) remain limited because of instability and residual pain. Regarding pain on a visual analog scale, 94%, 95%, and 83% of patients reported less than a 3 at rest, with daily activity, and with sport, respectively. Seven patients (11%) had subsequent ACL rupture. Six patients (9%) underwent ACL reconstruction 3.1 years (range, 0.9-7) after initial repair. Fourteen patients (21%) required at least 1 additional procedure. Regarding the contralateral knee, there were no ACL or tibial spine injuries. Sixty-one (92%) patients were both satisfied and would definitely undergo the procedure again. Conclusions Although many pediatric patients demonstrate excellent results after tibial spine repair at mean 5.8 years follow-up, 10.6% sustained an ipsilateral ACL rupture, and 21% required an additional procedure. No patient had a contralateral tibial spine or ACL injury. This is helpful when counseling patients regarding injury risk when returning to activity after tibial spine repair. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) in the identification of hip capsular defects in patients who previously underwent hip arthroscopy.Patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy for capsular insufficiency by a single surgeon between March 2014 and December 2019 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Patients with arthroscopically confirmed capsular defects treated surgically who underwent both MRI and MRA between their primary and revision surgeries were identified. Imaging studies were blinded, randomized, and distributed to two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Radiologists evaluated 14 components of different anatomic structures, including the presence of capsular defect and defect grading, over 2 months, with a 2-week washout period between 4 sets of reads to obtain 2 complete reads from each radiologist. Data were analyzed in R version 4.0.2.Two hundred thirty patients underwent revision hip arthroscopy between March 2014 and December 2019. Twelve patients had both an MRI and an MRA of the operated hip performed between their primary and revision surgeries. Time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 2.0 ± 1.5 years (R: .3-6.3). Time between MRI and MRA was .6 ± .6 years (R: .0-1.6). Sensitivity for detecting hip capsular defects was significantly higher for MRA than for MRI (87.5%, 95% CI: [68,96] vs 50%, 95% CI: [31,69], respectively;This retrospective review demonstrates that MRA has higher sensitivity than MRI in detecting surgically confirmed capsular defects. MRA may be more helpful in identifying capsular defects in patients presenting with hip instability symptoms who have had a previous hip arthroscopy.Level IV, diagnostic case series.

To evaluate mid-term outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with and without tape augmentation in the skeletally mature adolescent population.All patients under age 18 with recurrent patellar instability treated with surgery at a single institution by a single surgeon from January 2013 through June 2017 were identified by current procedural terminology codes. Inclusion criteria were (1) primary MPFL reconstruction, (2) minimum 3 years' follow-up, (3) skeletal maturity. Exclusion criteria were (1) bilateral MPFL reconstruction using different techniques on each knee, (2) prior surgery for patellar instability. Chart and imaging review was completed. Patients were contacted to complete a questionnaire, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form.Fifty-one of 92 eligible patients completed questionnaires. Two patients were excluded. Twenty patients underwent 23 non-augmented MPFL reconstructions; 29 patients underwent 33 augmented MPFL reconstructions. Group demographics were similar. At 4.9 ± 1.2 years follow-up, mean IKDC scores were 77.4 and 79.4 in the nonaugmentation and augmentation groups, respectively. Significantly fewer patients in the augmentation group experienced further injury to their ipsilateral knee compared to the non-augmentation group (6% vs 30%,There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes after MPFL reconstruction with or without tape augmentation. Tape augmentation significantly decreased the risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee injuries, although it did not show a significant difference in recurrent dislocations.IV, therapeutic case series.

Purpose: To quantify the magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) capsular morphologic findings associated with postarthroscopy hip instability. Methods: Among patients with clinically significant iatrogenic hip instability at a single center, patients with preindex and postindex surgery MRAs were identified. These MRAs were compared regarding effective intracapsular volume calculated by semi-automated 3-dimensional pixel intensity region segmentation, 2-dimensional anterior proximal intracapsular area in the femoral neck axial plane reconstruction, maximal anterior fluid pocket depth, capsule retraction distance, and capsular instability grade. Morphological measurements were conducted using Horos image processing software. Paired t-test, paired Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the McNemar test were used for identifying statistical significance. Results: In 42 patients, mean effective intracapsular volume was significantly greater in the postindex surgery MRAs (19.44 cm3 vs 17.26 cm3; P = .006). Proximal anterosuperior (12-3 o'clock) intracapsular area was also significantly greater after index surgery (2.84 cm2 vs 1.43 cm2; P < .001. Proximal anteroinferior (3-6 o'clock) intracapsular area (1.34 cm2 vs 0.97 cm2; P = .002), capsule deficiency grade (P < .001), anterior capsule retraction distance (4.83 mm vs 0.34 mm; P < .001), and maximum anterior fluid depth (8.33 mm vs 4.90 mm; P