Search

Objective: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and potentially lethal complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Screening by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is recommended in all patients with risk factors, including early disease. Little is known on late presentations of ILD. This study aimed to characterize the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of late-onset SSc-ILD., Methods: Study participants enrolled in the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group cohort from 2004 to 2020 without prevalent ILD were included. Incidence and risk factors for ILD (on HRCT) were compared according to disease duration above (late) and below (earlier) seven years from the first non-Raynaud manifestation. Risk of ILD progression was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models., Results: Overall, 199 (21%) of 969 patients developed incident ILD over a median of 2.4 (interquartile range 1.2-4.3) years. The incidence rate in late SSc (3.7/100 person-years) was lower than in earlier SSc (relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.92). Risk factors for incident ILD included male sex, diffuse subtype, myositis, antitopoisomerase I autoantibodies, and higher C-reactive protein levels. Patients with late-onset ILD were also less frequently White and more frequently had arthritis and anti-RNA-polymerase III autoantibodies. Lung disease severity was similar between late- and earlier-onset SSc-ILD (forced vital capacity 88% and 87%, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide 64% and 62%, respectively). Progression rates were also similar between late- and earlier-onset SSc-ILD (log rank P = 0.8, hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.58-2.10)., Conclusion: ILD can present in late SSc. Risk factors and progression rates overlapped with earlier-onset SSc-ILD. Surveillance for ILD should continue in longstanding SSc. Frequency and modality of monitoring remain to be defined., (© 2024 The Author(s). Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To generate a core set of items to develop classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) using consensus methodology., Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi exercise developed using a survey based on items identified by a scoping review. In round 1, participants were asked to identify omissions and clarify ambiguities regarding the items in the survey. In round 2, participants were asked to rate the validity and feasibility of the items using Likert-type scales ranging from 1 to 9 (where 1 = very invalid/unfeasible, 5 = uncertain, and 9 = very valid/feasible). In round 3, participants reviewed the results and comments from round 2 and were asked to provide final ratings. Items rated as highly valid and feasible (median scores ≥7 for each) in round 3 were selected as the provisional core set of items. A consensus meeting using a nominal group technique was conducted to further reduce the core set of items., Results: Ninety-nine experts from 16 countries participated in the Delphi exercise. Of the 31 items in the survey, consensus was achieved on 13, in the categories hypertension, renal insufficiency, proteinuria, and hemolysis. Eleven experts took part in the nominal group technique discussion, where consensus was achieved in 5 domains: blood pressure, acute kidney injury, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, target organ dysfunction, and renal histopathology., Conclusion: A core set of items that characterize SRC was identified using consensus methodology. This core set will be used in future data-driven phases of this project to develop classification criteria for SRC., (© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.)