Search

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast, a novel, orally available small molecule that specifically targets phosphodiesterase 4, in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: This phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included the following: a 12-week treatment phase, with patients receiving placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice per day, or apremilast 40 mg once per day; a 12-week treatment-extension phase, with patients in the placebo group re-randomized to receive apremilast; and a 4-week observational phase after treatment cessation. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at week 12. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory parameters, and electrocardiograms., Results: Of the 204 patients with PsA who were randomized to a treatment group, 165 completed the treatment phase. At the end of the treatment phase (week 12), 43.5% of patients receiving apremilast 20 mg twice per day (P < 0.001) and 35.8% of those receiving 40 mg once per day (P = 0.002) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 11.8% of those receiving placebo. At the end of the treatment-extension phase (week 24), >40% of patients in each group (patients receiving apremilast 20 mg twice per day, patients receiving apremilast 40 mg once per day, and patients in the placebo group re-randomized to receive apremilast) achieved the ACR20 level of improvement. Most patients in the treatment phase (84.3%) and treatment-extension phase (68.3%) reported ≥ 1 AE. Diarrhea, headache, nausea, fatigue, and nasopharyngitis were reported most frequently; most events were mild or moderate. No clinically relevant laboratory or electrocardiographic abnormalities were reported., Conclusion: Treatment with apremilast at a dosage of 20 mg twice per day or 40 mg once per day demonstrated efficacy in comparison with placebo and was generally well tolerated in patients with active PsA. The balance of efficacy, tolerability, and safety supports further study of apremilast in PsA., (Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation modulator, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: In this 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study, 170 PsA patients with a psoriasis target lesion (TL) ≥2 cm who had previously taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo or abatacept at doses of 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or 30/10 mg/kg (2 initial doses of 30 mg/kg, followed by 10 mg/kg) on days 1, 15, and 29 and then once every 28 days thereafter. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20 response) on day 169. Other key end points were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores for joint erosion, osteitis, and synovitis, scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, the investigator's global assessment of psoriasis, the TL score, and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score., Results: Proportions of patients achieving an ACR20 response were 19%, 33%, 48%, and 42% in the placebo, the abatacept 3 mg/kg, the abatacept 10 mg/kg, and the abatacept 30/10 mg/kg groups, respectively. Compared with placebo, improvements were significantly higher for the abatacept 10 mg/kg (P = 0.006) and 30/10 mg/kg (P = 0.022) groups, but not for 3 mg/kg group (P = 0.121). All abatacept regimens resulted in improved MRI, HAQ, and SF-36 scores, with 10 mg/kg showing the greatest improvements. Improvements in the TL and PASI scores were observed in all abatacept arms; a response according to the investigator's global assessment was seen only with 3 mg/kg of abatacept. The safety profiles were similar among the treatment arms., Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that 10 mg/kg of abatacept, the approved dosage for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, may be an effective treatment option for PsA., (Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Current treatment options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are limited. Leflunomide, an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is highly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and small studies have suggested similar efficacy in PsA. We undertook this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with PsA and psoriasis., Methods: One hundred ninety patients with active PsA and psoriasis (at least 3% skin involvement) were randomized to receive leflunomide (100 mg/day loading dose for 3 days followed by 20 mg/day orally) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients classified as responders by the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC). Additional efficacy (joint and skin involvement), safety, and quality-of-life assessments were performed., Results: At 24 weeks, 56 of 95 leflunomide-treated patients (58.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 48.4-68.9) and 27 of 91 placebo-treated patients (29.7% [95% CI 20.6-40.2]) were classified as responders by the PsARC (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in favor of leflunomide were also observed in the proportions of patients achieving modified American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria, improvement in the designated psoriasis target lesion, and mean changes from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores and quality-of-life assessments. Diarrhea and alanine aminotransferase increases occurred at higher rates in the leflunomide group. No cases of serious liver toxicity were observed., Conclusion: Leflunomide is an effective treatment for PsA and psoriasis, providing a safe and convenient alternative to current therapies.

Objective: More than 50% of patients with synovitis involving 1-4 joints remain classified as having undifferentiated oligoarthritis (UOA) after 1 year of disease. The clinical presentation is often similar to that of reactive arthritis (ReA) and other spondylarthropathies or to Lyme arthritis. We therefore determined how often Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) can be identified in patients with UOA, by using an extensive laboratory approach., Methods: We prospectively studied 52 patients with UOA who presented at an early synovitis clinic in a region highly endemic for Lyme disease. Patients were examined by standardized clinical and immunoserologic procedures. Synovial fluid was screened for the presence of Ct and Bb DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Urine was tested for Ct DNA by ligase chain reaction, and serum was tested for Ct antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Bb antibodies by hemagglutination test and Western blotting. PCR results in the UOA patients were compared with the results in cohorts of patients with definite rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Lyme arthritis, and Chlamydia-induced arthritis (CIA)., Results: In the synovial fluid of 9 of 52 patients with UOA (17%), we found Ct DNA, and in 6 of the 52 patients (12%), Bb DNA was found. The frequency of bacteria-specific DNA was 50% (7 of 14) in CIA patients and 69% (11 of 16) in patients with Lyme arthritis. No Bb or Ct DNA was found in the synovial fluid of the 31 RA patients., Conclusion: With optimized PCR protocols, it is possible to detect considerable levels of Bb and Ct DNA in the synovial fluid of patients with UOA. Although the presence of bacterial DNA does not unequivocally prove its etiologic significance, we suggest that at least one-third of patients with UOA may have a form of ReA that involves asymptomatic primary infection.

We describe a 73-year-old forest owner with widespread erythema, myalgia, and proximal muscle weakness. The clinical signs and the results of electromyography, magnetic resonance imaging, and a muscle biopsy were consistent with dermatomyositis. However, serology was positive for Borrelia burgdorferi. More importantly, B burgdorferi DNA was detected in skin by polymerase chain reaction techniques, and spirochete-like organisms were detected in the muscle by silver staining. Lyme disease with muscle involvement can mimic or trigger dermatomyositis and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dermatomyositis.

Objective: Increasing evidence suggests that there is a close interrelationship between the immune system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. One way these systems are linked is through specific receptor proteins for glucocorticoid hormones in lymphocytes. We sought to determine whether the levels of these receptors differ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with levels in healthy subjects., Methods: We determined the density and affinity of lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptors, as well as basal cortisol levels, in 90 patients with active RA and in 200 healthy controls, using a whole cell binding assay., Results: The number of glucocorticoid receptors in RA patients was significantly lower than in controls (mean +/- SD 2,144 +/- 500 per cell versus 5,619 +/- 1,373 per cell; P less than 0.001), whereas there were no differences in binding affinity or cortisol levels. Glucocorticoid receptor density did not correlate with inflammatory disease activity., Conclusion: Since glucocorticoids are potent immunosuppressive agents, the decrease in their receptors suggests an impairment of the immune-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with RA.