Search

Objective Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of axial spondylarthritis (SpA), but it is unknown whether characteristic lesions are actually specific for SpA. This study was undertaken to compare MRI patterns of disease in active SpA, degenerative arthritis (DA), and malignancy. Methods Fat-suppressed MRI of the axial skeleton was performed on 174 patients with back pain and 11 control subjects. Lesions detected by MRI, including Romanus lesions (RLs) and end-plate, diffuse vertebral body, posterior element, and spinous process bone marrow edema (BME) lesions, were scored in a blinded manner. An imaging diagnosis was given based on MRI findings alone, and this was compared with the gold-standard treating physician's diagnosis. Results The physician diagnosis was SpA in 64 subjects, DA in 45 subjects, malignancy in 45 subjects, other diagnoses in 20 subjects, and normal in 11 subjects. There was 72% agreement between the imaging diagnosis and physician diagnosis. End-plate edema, degenerative discs, and RLs were frequently observed in patients with any of the 3 major diagnoses. Single RLs were of low diagnostic utility for SpA, but ≥3 RLs (likelihood ratio [LR] 12.4) and severe RLs (LR infinite) in younger subjects were highly diagnostic of SpA. Posterior element BME lesions of mild or moderate grade were also highly diagnostic of SpA (LR 14.5). The most common diagnostic confusion was between SpA and DA, since both had RLs present and the presence/absence of degenerative discs did not change the diagnostic assessment. Conclusion This study confirms the high diagnostic utility of MRI in axial SpA, with severe or multiple RLs evident on MRI being characteristic in younger patients and mild/moderate posterior element lesions being specific for SpA. However, MRI lesions previously considered to be characteristic of SpA could also be found frequently in patients with DA and patients with malignancy, and therefore such lesions should be interpreted with caution, particularly in older patients.

Objective To investigate the frequency and distribution of finger tenosynovitis in patients with early, untreated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using gray-scale ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Fifty patients underwent US and MRI of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2–5. Twenty healthy controls underwent US only. Flexor and extensor involvement was documented for each joint. Intrareader reliability (IRR) was calculated by rereading static images. Results Flexor tenosynovitis was found in 57 (28.5%) of 200 joints in 24 (48%) of 50 patients on US compared with 128 (64%) of 200 joints in 41 (82%) of 50 patients on MRI. Periextensor tenosynovitis was found in 14 (7%) joints in 9 (18%) patients on US compared with 80 (40%) joints in 36 (72%) patients on MRI. No controls had imaging tenosynovitis. Using MRI as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for US were 0.44, 0.99, 0.49, and 0.98, respectively, for flexor tenosynovitis and 0.15, 0.98, 0.63, and 0.86 for extensor tenosynovitis, respectively. The IRR was 0.85 and 0.8 for US and MRI, respectively. The most frequently involved joints on US and MRI were the second and third MCP joints. Conclusion This is the first study to compare US and MRI for the detection of tenosynovitis in the fingers of patients with early untreated RA. Tenosynovitis was found to be common using both modalities, with MRI being more sensitive. A negative US scan does not exclude inflammation and an MRI should be considered. Further work is recommended to standardize definitions and image acquisition for both US and MRI images.

Objective To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the importance of knee joint synovitis at the cartilage–pannus junction (CPJ) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as compared with synovitis at a distant site in the suprapatellar pouch (SPP) and as compared with CPJ synovitis in the spondylarthropathies (SpA), and to assess the relative response of knee joint synovitis to therapy at the CPJ and SPP sites. Methods Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DEMRI) of actively involved knee joints in 24 patients (13 with RA and 11 with SpA) was undertaken. The area of synovitis was calculated at the CPJ and SPP regions of interest in patients with RA and in patients with SpA. Differences in CPJ and SPP synovitis were determined using calculated DEMRI parameters which included the initial rate of contrast enhancement (IRE) and the maximal enhancement (ME). Changes in the synovial area at the CPJ and SPP were also measured in 10 patients with early RA, following treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (either methotrexate or leflunomide). Results In patients with RA or SpA, the area of synovitis was significantly larger immediately adjacent to the CPJ compared with a distant site at the SPP (in RA, mean synovitis area 162 mm2 at the CPJ versus 114 mm2 at the SPP [P = 0.010]; in SpA, mean synovitis area 214 mm2 at the CPJ versus 143 mm2 at the SPP [P = 0.002]), but the differences in the areas of synovitis at these sites were not significant between the RA and SpA patients. The IRE and ME values were also higher at the CPJ compared with the SPP, both in the RA patients (IRE P = 0.054, ME P = 0.018) and in the SpA patients (IRE P = 0.002, ME P = 0.001). A larger reduction in the area of synovitis was seen at the SPP compared with the CPJ following DMARD therapy in the RA patients (mean reduction 35% at the SPP [P = 0.023] and 12% at the CPJ [P not significant]). Conclusion The non–disease-specific variations in synovitis and the differential responses to therapy in RA patients have implications for improving our understanding of CPJ synovitis. The results suggest that the pathophysiologic events at the CPJ reflect common anatomic, immune system, or biomechanical factors that play a role in modulating the severity of arthritis, and these events are not specific to RA since the same process was observed in other arthritides.