Search

Objective: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission who are receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), radiographic progression correlates with imaging-detected synovitis as measured by power Doppler activity. In contrast, patients with disease in remission who are receiving the combination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade with methotrexate (MTX) (combination treatment) have reduced radiographic damage for the equivalent clinical state. We undertook this study to determine whether the difference in radiographic outcome is a result of more complete suppression of imaging-detected synovitis., Methods: One hundred patients with RA in remission (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28] <2.6) for at least 6 months while receiving either combination treatment (n = 50) or DMARDs (n = 50) were matched for clinical variables. Ultrasound of metacarpophalangeal joints 1-5 and the wrist joints was performed. Remission according to imaging results was defined as a score of 0 for both grey scale synovitis and power Doppler activity., Results: In patients receiving combination treatment or DMARDs (median DAS28 1.65 versus 1.78, median disease duration 120 months versus 90 months, and median duration of remission 13 months versus 18 months), the proportion with remission according to imaging results was not significantly different (10% versus 16%, respectively). The combination treatment group had more grey scale synovitis (P < 0.001) but similar power Doppler activity (48% versus 60%, respectively; P = 0.229) in any joint as compared with the DMARD group. Results were not affected by stratification for duration of disease or remission., Conclusion: In RA patients with disease in remission, imaging-detected synovitis persists, with power Doppler activity seen in >or=48% of the patients regardless of therapy. These results suggest that superior radiographic outcomes in patients treated with the combination of TNF blockade and MTX may not be due to complete suppression of imaging-detected synovitis.

Objective: To establish an expert consensus of best practice for rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS)., Methods: A panel of worldwide experts in MUS was identified by literature review, membership of teaching faculty, and peer recommendation. They were invited to take part in a 4-stage Delphi process employing 2 iterative rounds to establish a consensus of specific indications, anatomic areas, and knowledge and skills required by rheumatologists performing MUS., Results: Experts in MUS were identified (n = 57; 37 radiologists, 20 rheumatologists). Successive rounds of this rigorous Delphi exercise enabled group consensus to be achieved in 30 of the proposed 37 categories comprising 8 of 13 indications (inflammatory arthritis, tendon pathology, effusion, bursitis, monitoring disease activity, monitoring disease progression, guided aspiration, and injection), 8 of 10 anatomic areas (hand, wrist, elbow, shoulder, hip, knee, ankle and heel, and forefoot), and 14 categories of knowledge and skills (physics, anatomy, pathology, equipment, clinical application and relevance, indications and limitations, artifact, machine function and operation, patient and probe position, planes and system of examination, image optimization, dynamic assessment, color Doppler, and power Doppler)., Conclusion: We have produced the first expert-derived, interdisciplinary consensus of recommendations for rheumatologists performing MUS. This represents a significant advance that will not only direct future rheumatology MUS practice, but will facilitate informed educational development. This is an important step towards the introduction of a specific training curriculum and assessment process to ensure competent rheumatologist ultrasonographers.

Objective: To evaluate the training and practice of specialist practitioners in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS) with the aim of developing an expert-derived consensus of educational standards for rheumatologists performing MUS., Methods: A panel of worldwide experts in MUS was identified by literature review, consultation with members of training committees, and peer recommendation. Using a postal questionnaire, information was obtained about personal experience, current practice, training regimen, and participation in competency assessment., Results: International experts in MUS were identified (57 in total: 37 radiologists, 20 rheumatologists). Response rate was 70%. Radiologists had been performing MUS for longer than rheumatologists. Both rheumatologists and radiologists conducted the same number of MUS sessions per week, although radiologists examined more patients. More radiologists performed MUS for muscle and ligament injury, nerve lesions, soft tissue masses, and of the groin (P <0.01). The number of training hours was similar. Approaches to training varied, although attending a training course and scanning with an expert was more common among rheumatologists (P <0.001). More than two-thirds of the group had not undergone any form of competency assessment., Conclusion: This study highlights differences in training and practice between individual expert ultrasonographers and between specialty backgrounds. In particular, there appears to be no formal training regimen and competency assessment is uncommon. The establishment of a core set of internationally applicable educational standards for MUS training for rheumatologists is required.

Objective: To investigate the role of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint anatomic and biomechanical factors in the distribution of synovitis and bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Thirty-three patients with early RA with clinically diagnosed MCP joint disease and 28 healthy controls were examined by magnetic resonance imaging of the second to fifth MCP joints of the dominant hand. T1 and T2 fat-suppressed coronal sequences were obtained to assess erosion, and dynamic contrast-enhanced images were acquired to assess synovitis in all of the RA patients and in 8 of the controls. Erosions were defined as bone defects with sharp margins observed using T1-weighted imaging in 2 planes, with a cortical break seen in at least 1 plane. The location of erosions was recorded. The volume of synovitis surrounding each MCP joint (divided into 8 regions) was calculated by summation of voxels derived from the maximal enhancement parameters. The synovial volumes adjacent to MCP joint collateral ligaments were determined by correcting synovial volumes for the positions of asymmetrically placed flexor tendons., Results: In patients with early RA in whom bone erosions were present, there was a propensity for involvement of the radial side of the second (P < 0.0001), third (P = 0.002), and fourth (P = 0.056) MCP joints, but not the fifth. Fifty-two of the 110 erosions (47.3%) occurred adjacent to the radial collateral ligaments of the second, third, and fourth MCP joints. The volume of synovitis was also greater on the radial side of the second (P < 0.0001) and third (P < 0.001) MCP joints. A predilection for synovitis in all of the MCP joints adjacent to the radial collateral ligaments was evident when the positional effects of the flexor tendon were considered. The position of radial collateral ligaments had an effect on erosion formation that was independent of synovitis. A predilection for radial bone damage was also evident in the controls, although lesions were 5-fold less frequent, were generally smaller, and had well-defined margins., Conclusion: This study shows that there is a predilection for both synovitis and bone erosion formation on the radial side of the MCP joints in early RA, and that joint inflammation appears to drive the inherent tendency for bone damage on the radial side of joints. These findings have implications regarding the pathogenesis of joint damage in RA.