Search

ObjectiveTo determine whether intraarticular glucocorticoid (GC) injections are associated with increased knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, which have been reported to delay OA progression and knee replacement.MethodsWe identified participants from 2 large cohort studies, the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Study visits were performed at regular intervals and included questionnaires about intraarticular GC or HA injection use in the previous 6 months and incident total knee replacement (TKR). Knee radiographs were obtained at each study visit and interpreted in a similar manner. Outcome measures were radiographic progression based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade and joint space narrowing (JSN) for both cohorts and based on medial joint space width for OAI participants, and incident TKR. We compared preinjection and postinjection radiographs to generate rate ratios of progression comparing GC injection with HA injection. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the rate of TKR for both groups.ResultsWe studied 791 participants (980 knees) with knee OA, of whom 629 reported GC injection use and 162 HA injection use. Rate ratios of progression were similar between those receiving GCs and those receiving HA for JSN (1.00 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83-1.21]), K/L grade (1.03 [95% CI 0.83-1.29]), and medial joint space width (1.03 [95% CI 0.72-1.48]). Hazard of TKR was slightly lower for those receiving intraarticular GC compared to those receiving HA (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.51-1.09]).ConclusionIntraarticular GC injections are not associated with an increased risk of knee OA progression compared to HA.

ObjectiveOsteoarthritis (OA) and pain are both made more severe by low-grade inflammation. This study was undertaken to examine whether visceral fat, a major source of inflammatory cytokines and adipokines, is associated with an increased risk of knee OA or musculoskeletal pain.MethodsSubjects in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study cohort, who were age 50-79 years and had or were at high risk of knee OA, underwent whole-body dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline. At baseline, 30 months, and 60 months radiographs and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the knees were obtained, and patients were asked to score the severity of their knee pain and to identify sites of joint pain using a body homunculus. Baseline DXA scans were used to measure total body fat and visceral and subcutaneous fat in the torso. The association of fat depot size with structural outcomes (incident radiographic OA and cartilage loss and synovitis on MRI) and with pain outcomes (worsening knee pain, number of painful joints, and widespread pain) was assessed. Regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, education level, smoking status, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), and depressive symptoms.ResultsOf the 2,961 participants at baseline, 60.7% were women. The mean age was 62.5 years and mean BMI was 30.5 kg/m2 . After adjustment for covariates, no fat measures were associated with any structural outcomes. However, total and visceral, but not subcutaneous, fat were positively associated with worsening knee pain (P = 0.0005 for total fat and P = 0.007 for visceral fat) and widespread pain (P = 0.001 for total fat and P = 0.02 for visceral fat), and the amount of visceral fat was associated with the number of painful joints (P = 0.07).ConclusionOur findings indicate that visceral fat is associated with an increased risk of musculoskeletal and widespread pain.

ObjectiveMany persons with knee pain have joint pain outside the knee, but despite the impact and high frequency of this pain, its distribution and causes have not been studied. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis of those studying gait abnormalities who have suggested that knee pain causes pain in adjacent joints but that pain adaptation strategies are highly individualized.MethodsWe studied persons ages 50-79 years with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis who were recruited from 2 community-based cohorts, the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative, and we followed them up for 5-7 years. We excluded those with knee pain at baseline and compared those who had developed knee pain at the first follow-up examination (the index visit) with those who had not. We examined pain on most days at joint regions outside the knee in examinations after the index visit. Logistic regression analyses examined the risk of joint-specific pain adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and symptoms of depression, and we performed sensitivity analyses excluding those with widespread pain.ResultsIn the combined cohorts, 693 persons had knee pain at the index visit and 2,793 did not. A total of 79.6% of those with bilateral knee pain and 63.8% of those with unilateral knee pain had pain during follow-up in a joint region outside the knee, compared with 49.9% of those without knee pain. There was an increased risk of pain at most extremity joint sites, without a predilection for specific sites. Results were unchanged when those with widespread pain were excluded.ConclusionPersons with chronic knee pain are at increased risk of pain in multiple joints in no specific pattern.

Objective: To assess whether vascular activity seen on 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) scan is associated with angiographic change in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Methods: Patients with LVV were recruited into a prospective cohort. All patients underwent magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography and FDG‐PET imaging. Follow‐up imaging using the same imaging modalities was obtained ≥6 months later per a standardized imaging protocol. Arterial damage, defined as stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm, and corresponding FDG uptake were evaluated in 17 arterial territories. On follow‐up, development of new lesions was recorded, and existing lesions were characterized as improved, worsened, or unchanged. Results: A total of 1,091 arterial territories from 70 patients with LVV (38 patients with Takayasu arteritis, 32 patients with giant cell arteritis) were evaluated. Over a median 1.6 years of follow‐up, new lesions developed only in 8 arterial territories in 5 patients with Takayasu arteritis. Arterial lesions improved in 16 territories and worsened in 6 territories. Most arterial territories that did not have vascular activity on FDG‐PET scan at baseline had no angiographic change over the follow‐up period (787 [99%] of 793). Few territories with baseline FDG‐PET activity had angiographic change over time (24 [8%] of 298), but of the territories that developed angiographic change, 80% had FDG‐PET activity at baseline. Within the same patient, an arterial territory with baseline FDG‐PET activity had significantly increased risk for angiographic change compared to a paired arterial territory without FDG‐PET activity (odds ratio 19.49 [95% confidence interval 2.44–156.02]; P < 0.01). Concomitant edema and wall thickening further increased risk for angiographic change. Conclusion: Development of angiographic change was infrequent in this cohort of patients with LVV. A lack of baseline FDG‐PET activity was strongly associated with stable angiographic disease. In cases of angiographic progression, change was preceded by the presence of FDG‐PET activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An editorial is presented on reexamining remission definitions in rheumatoid arthritis while considering the twenty-eight–joint disease activity score, c-reactive protein level, and patient global assessment. Topics include definitions performed best in predicting long-term good function and lack of radiographic progression; and committee endorsed a stringent definition using measures from the validated core set of outcome measures.