Search

OBJECTIVE: To provide a single source for the best available estimates of the US prevalence of and number of individuals affected by arthritis overall, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, the spondylarthritides, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and Sjögren's syndrome. A companion article (part II) addresses additional conditions. METHODS: The National Arthritis Data Workgroup reviewed published analyses from available national surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). For analysis of overall arthritis, we used the NHIS. Because data based on national population samples are unavailable for most specific rheumatic conditions, we derived estimates from published studies of smaller, defined populations. For specific conditions, the best available prevalence estimates were applied to the corresponding 2005 US population estimates from the Census Bureau, to estimate the number affected with each condition. RESULTS: More than 21% of US adults (46.4 million persons) were found to have self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis. We estimated that rheumatoid arthritis affects 1.3 million adults (down from the estimate of 2.1 million for 1995), juvenile arthritis affects 294,000 children, spondylarthritides affect from 0.6 million to 2.4 million adults, systemic lupus erythematosus affects from 161,000 to 322,000 adults, systemic sclerosis affects 49,000 adults, and primary Sjögren's syndrome affects from 0.4 million to 3.1 million adults. CONCLUSION: Arthritis and other rheumatic conditions continue to be a large and growing public health problem. Estimates for many specific rheumatic conditions rely on a few, small studies of uncertain generalizability to the US population. This report provides the best available prevalence estimates for the US, but for most specific conditions, more studies generalizable to the US or addressing understudied populations are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Several inflammatory rheumatic diseases are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis may result from systemic and/or local vascular inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of chronic inflammatory infiltrates in the aortas of patients with and those without inflammatory rheumatic disease who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and to assess the relationship between the infiltrates and other factors thought to play a role in atherosclerosis, such as smoking. METHODS: Aortic specimens routinely removed during CABG surgery in 66 consecutive patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease and 51 control patients without inflammatory rheumatic disease were examined by light microscopy for the occurrence, location, and severity of chronic inflammatory infiltrates and atherosclerotic lesions. RESULTS: Mononuclear cell infiltrates in the inner adventitia (apart from those localized along the epicardium) were more frequent in the group of patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (47% versus 20%; P = 0.002, odds ratio [OR] OR 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.6-8.5), and the extent of these infiltrates was greater. Multivariate analyses revealed that the occurrence of mononuclear cell infiltrates was associated with inflammatory rheumatic disease (OR 2.99, P = 0.020) and current smoking (OR 3.93, P = 0.012), and they were observed in 6 of 7 patients with a history of aortic aneurysm. Inflammatory infiltrates in the media were seen only in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. The frequency of atherosclerotic lesions, inflammation within the plaques, and epicardial inflammatory infiltrates in the 2 groups was equal. CONCLUSION: Among aortic samples collected during CABG surgery, those obtained from patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease had more pronounced chronic inflammatory infiltration in the media and inner adventitia than those obtained from control patients. Current smoking was an independent predictor of chronic inner adventitial infiltrates. The infiltrates may represent an inflammatory process that promotes atherosclerosis and formation of aneurysms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 3 therapeutic strategies in preventing progressive joint damage, in a population-based cohort. The 3 strategies were infliximab with concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), etanercept with concomitant DMARDs, and etanercept alone. METHODS: We used sequential radiographs to assess all patients who were treated with infliximab or etanercept for >10 months. The rates of erosion progression and joint space narrowing (JSN) were analyzed using multivariate regression models for longitudinal data, with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies met the inclusion criteria. The baseline characteristics of the patients assigned to the 3 strategies were not significantly different, except that, as expected, more patients were receiving combination therapy with infliximab. The combination of infliximab plus DMARDs was significantly more effective than etanercept alone for controlling erosion progression (P < 0.001), but the effectiveness of the 2 combination-treatment strategies was similar (P = 0.07). The combination of infliximab plus DMARDs was also more effective at controlling progressive JSN compared with etanercept alone (P = 0.04) or etanercept plus DMARDs (P = 0.02). Treatment with anti-TNF agents (infliximab or etanercept) plus concomitant DMARDs was more effective than treatment with etanercept alone for controlling erosion progression (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: When combined with traditional DMARDs, both etanercept and infliximab appear to offer similar protection against progressive structural joint damage, and combination therapy with either of these agents appears to be more effective than treatment with etanercept alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]