1. Limitations of Current Rehabilitation Practices in Pediatric Oncology: Implications for Improving Comprehensive Clinical Care
- Author
-
Kristin M Thomas, Allison A. King, Molly Houdeshell, and Allison J. L’Hotta
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Services Needs and Demand ,Rehabilitation ,Service delivery framework ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Psychological intervention ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Pediatric cancer ,Pediatrics ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Family medicine ,Neoplasms ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Cohort ,Pediatric oncology ,medicine ,Outpatient clinic ,Humans ,Comprehensive Health Care ,Clinical care ,business ,Child - Abstract
Objective To identify the proportion of hospitals/clinics in the United States (US) that have a comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation program and characterize current practices. Design Cross-sectional survey of rehabilitation providers in the US and internationally. Setting Electronic or telephone survey. Participants Rehabilitation or supportive care practitioners employed at a hospital, outpatient clinic, or medical university (N=231). Interventions Electronic and telephone survey. The full electronic survey contained 39 questions, provided opportunities for open-ended responses, and covered 3 main categories specific to pediatric cancer rehabilitation: service delivery, rehabilitation program practices, and education/training. The short telephone survey included 4 questions from the full survey and was designed to answer the primary study objective. Main Outcome Measures Proportion of hospitals/clinics with a comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation program. Results This cohort includes rehabilitation providers from 191 hospitals/clinics, 49 states within the US, and 5 countries outside of the US. Of hospitals/clinics represented from the full and short survey, 145 (76%) do not have an established pediatric oncology rehabilitation program. Nearly half of full survey respondents reported no knowledge of the prospective surveillance model, and 65% reported no education was provided to them regarding pediatric cancer rehabilitation. Qualitative survey responses fell into 3 major themes: variability in approach to rehabilitation service delivery, program gaps, and need for additional educational opportunities. Conclusions There is evidence of limited comprehensive rehabilitation programming for children with cancer as demonstrated by the lack of programs with coordinated interdisciplinary care, variability in long-term follow-up, and absence of education and training. Research is needed to support the development and implementation of comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation programs.
- Published
- 2021