1. Do 6 months of whole-body vibration training improve lean mass and bone mass acquisition of adolescent swimmers?
- Author
-
Gabriel Lozano-Berges, Alejandro Gómez-Bruton, Germán Vicente-Rodríguez, Alba Gómez-Cabello, Cristina Julián, José A. Casajús, A. González-Agüero, and Ángel Matute-Llorente
- Subjects
Male ,musculoskeletal diseases ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Bone density ,Population ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Lumbar vertebrae ,medicine.disease_cause ,Vibration ,Weight-bearing ,Weight-Bearing ,03 medical and health sciences ,Absorptiometry, Photon ,0302 clinical medicine ,Bone Density ,medicine ,Humans ,Whole body vibration ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Child ,education ,Swimming ,Bone mineral ,education.field_of_study ,Lumbar Vertebrae ,Anthropometry ,business.industry ,030229 sport sciences ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Body Composition ,Physical therapy ,Lean body mass ,Female ,Hip Joint ,business - Abstract
Swimming has little effect on bone mass. Therefore, adolescent swimmers should complement their water training with a short and intense weight-bearing training, aiming to increase their bone acquisition. Forty swimmers performed a six-month whole-body vibration (WBV) training. WBV had no effect on adolescent swimmers’ bone mass or lean mass. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the effects of a whole-body vibration (WBV) intervention on bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC) and lean mass (LM) in adolescent swimmers. Forty male and female adolescent swimmers (VIB; mean age 14.2 ± 1.9 years) completed the WBV protocol that consisted of 15 min of training 3 days per week during a 6-month period (ranging from 3.6 to 11.6 g), while 23 swimmers (SWI; mean age 15.0 ± 2.2 years) continued with their regular swimming training alone. VIB were divided into tertiles according to training compliance in order to evaluate if any dose-effect relation existed. BMD, BMC and LM were measured longitudinally by dual energy X-ray at the whole body, lumbar-spine and hip. No group by time interactions and no differences in change percentage were found for BMD, BMC or LM in any of the measured variables. The mean change percentage of the subtotal body (whole body minus the head) for VIB and SWI, respectively, was 2.3 vs. 2.4% for BMD, 5.7 vs 5.7% for BMC and 7.3 vs. 8.0% for lean mass. Moreover, no indication for dose-response was observed. The proposed WBV protocol had no effect on BMD, BMC and LM in adolescent swimmers. Other types of training should be used in this population to improve both bone and lean mass.
- Published
- 2017