Search

Introduction: The variability in patients' femoral and tibial anatomy requires to use different tibia component sizes with the same femoral component size. These size combinations are allowed by manufacturers, but the clinical impact remains unclear. Therefore, the goals of our study were to investigate whether combining different sizes has an impact on the kinematics for two well-established knee systems and to compare these systems' kinematics to the native kinematics., Materials and Methods: Six fresh frozen knee specimens were tested in a force controlled knee rig before and after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR) and a posterior-stabilized (PS) implant. Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded using a ultrasonic-based motion analysis system while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. In each knee, the original best fit inlay was then replaced by different inlays simulating a smaller or bigger tibia component. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the original inlay kinematics using descriptive statistics., Results: For all size combinations, the difference to the original kinematics reached an average of 1.3 ± 3.3 mm in translation and - 0.1 ± 1.2° in rotation with the CR implant. With the PS implant, the average differences reached 0.4 ± 2.7 mm and  - 0.2 ± 0.8°. Among all knees, no size combination consistently resulted in significantly different kinematics. Each knee showed a singular kinematic pattern. For both knee systems, the rotation was smaller than in the native knee, but the direction of the rotation was preserved. The PS showed more rollback and the CR less rollback than the native knee., Conclusion: TKA systems designed with a constant tibio-femoral congruency among size combinations should enable to combine different sizes without having substantial impact on the kinematics. The rotational pattern was preserved by both TKA systems, while the rollback could only be maintained by the PS design., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Tenosynovial giant-cell tumor also known as pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVS) is a benign but aggressive synovial proliferative disease most often affecting the knee joint. The mainstay of therapy is surgical resection. Due to a high rate of local recurrence, radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) is used as an adjuvant method in many cases. The aim of this study was to compare local recurrence (LR) rates after surgical synovectomy with and without adjuvant RSO., Materials and Methods: From 1996 to 2014, 37 surgical interventions were performed in 32 patients with diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. All patients underwent open synovectomy. Adjuvant radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) was applied in 26 cases, the control group consists of 11 cases without RSO., Results: 9 (24%) lesions recurred within a median of 19 months after surgery. Of those 9 recurrences, 3 (17%) were seen in primary disease, 6 (32%) in already recurring cases (n.s.). In 26 RSO treated patients 6 (23%) recurred, in 11 patients of the control group, 3 (27%) recurred (n.s.)., Conclusions: RSO is effective in PVS as also shown in some smaller reports in the literature. But surgery is still the mainstay of therapy. RSO is not a method of compensating for an insufficient surgical approach, but it may reduce the high rate of LR in patients with large and even recurrent diffuse forms of the disease.

Introduction: Lateral retinacular release (LRR) is a common procedure during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially if patellar maltracking is observed intraoperatively. The impact of LRR on patellofemoral kinematics is well-examined, but the influence on femorotibial kinematics requires more elucidation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of LRR on femorotibial kinematics in vitro., Materials and Methods: A fixed bearing TKA was implanted in six human knee specimens. Femorotibial kinematics were measured dynamically through the use of a custom-constructed knee rig which flexes the knee from 20° to 120° under weight bearing conditions. Measurements were performed before and after LRR. LRR was performed completely including transection of synovium, retinaculum and tractus fibers. For the registration of tibiofemoral kinematics a 3-dimensional-ultrasound-based motion analysis system was used., Results: LRR revealed a significant reduction of femoral rollback at the lateral compartment (9.4 ± 5.0 vs 7.8 ± 9.4 mm; p < 0.01), whereas the present decrease of femoral rollback at the medial compartment was not significant (3.4 ± 4.7 vs 2.3 ± 5.9 mm; p = 0.34). Accordingly, LRR significantly reduced internal rotation of the tibia (0.8°; p < 0.01)., Conclusion: The results suggest that LRR significantly decreases lateral femoral rollback as well as internal rotation of the tibia, probably by changing the tension of the iliotibial band. When performing a LRR in clinical routine, surgeons should be aware of altering not only patellofemoral kinematics but also the femorotibial kinematics.

Introduction: Minimally invasive implantation of unicompartmental knee prostheses can shorten rehabilitation time and lead to better functional results than conventional implantation. Exact positioning of the implant should be achieved, as this is a factor for the long-term survival of the prosthesis, although malpositioning can result due to the poor intraoperative view when using the minimally invasive approach. Navigation of the unicompartmental prosthesis could lead to a better implant positioning without losing the advantages of a minimally invasive approach., Materials and Methods: The same unicondylar knee prosthesis was implanted in a total of 40 patients, of whom 20 were implanted using navigation (kinematic navigation) and 20 using a conventional technique. The operating time was assessed in both groups. The orientation of the tibial and femoral implants was assessed radiologically postoperatively. We analysed these results according to the optimal positioning range proposed by the manufacturer. Furthermore, we examined the clinical results with the knee society score (KSS)., Results: A good positioning of the prosthesis was observed in both techniques with only 11% of the radiologic measurements out of the proposed optimal range in each group. The operating time was significantly longer in the navigation group (17 min). The KSS did not differ between both groups at a follow-up of 16 resp. 18 months (navigated group: 184 points, conventional group: 178 points)., Conclusions: Navigation did not lead to a better positioning of the prosthesis than the conventional method and the operating time was longer. The clinical results were similar in both groups. The navigation may be a useful help for surgeons performing less unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a minimally invasive approach.