Search

In this study, we performed numerical investigations of the cavitating and supercavitating flow behind a three-dimensional disk with a particular emphasis on detailed comparisons of various turbulence and mass transfer models. Simulations were performed using the OpenFOAM package and flows at three different cavitation numbers, ( σ = 0.2, 0.1, and 0.05) were considered. Large eddy simulation (LES) and k – ω shear stress transport turbulence approaches were coupled with various mass transfer model types (e.g., Kunz, Schnerr–Sauer, and Zwart models). The Zwart mass transfer model was added to the standard OpenFOAM package. A compressive volume of fluid method was used to track the interface between the liquid and vapor phases. Our numerical results in terms of the cavity length, diameter, and drag coefficient compared fairly well with experimental data and a broad set of analytical relations. Moreover, this study provides a better understanding of the cavitation dynamics behind disk cavitators. Our results indicate that the most accurate solutions will be obtained by applying an LES turbulence approach combined with the Kunz mass transfer model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In this paper simulation of cavitating flow over the Clark-Y hydrofoil is reported using the large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence model and volume of fluid (VOF) technique. We applied an incompressible LES modelling approach based on an implicit method for the subgrid terms. To apply the cavitation model, the flow has been considered as a single fluid, two-phase mixture. A transport equation model for the local volume fraction of vapour is solved and a finite rate mass transfer model is used for the vapourization and condensation processes. A compressive volume of fluid (VOF) method is applied to track the interface of liquid and vapour phases. This simulation is performed using a finite volume, two phase solver available in the framework of the OpenFOAM (Open Field Operation and Manipulation) software package. Simulation is performed for the cloud and super-cavitation regimes, i.e., σ =0.8, 0.4, 0.28. We compared the results of two different mass transfer models, namely Kunz and Sauer models. The results of our simulation are compared for cavitation dynamics, starting point of cavitation, cavity’s diameter and force coefficients with the experimental data, where available. For both of steady state and transient conditions, suitable accuracy has been observed for cavitation dynamics and force coefficients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]