1. Post combustion CO2 capture in power plant using low temperature steam upgraded by double absorption heat transformer
- Author
-
Feng Liu, Lin Gao, Dandan Wang, Jun Sui, and Sheng Li
- Subjects
Exergy ,Engineering ,Flue gas ,Thermal efficiency ,Waste management ,Power station ,business.industry ,020209 energy ,Mechanical Engineering ,Thermal power station ,02 engineering and technology ,Building and Construction ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,General Energy ,020401 chemical engineering ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Exergy efficiency ,0204 chemical engineering ,Process simulation ,business ,Cost of electricity by source ,Process engineering - Abstract
In CO 2 capture retrofit unit of existing coal-fired power plants, energy level mismatch between extraction steam from turbines and CO 2 regeneration process always results in large exergy destruction and low thermal efficiency. Thus, a new CO 2 capture system driven by double absorption heat transformer is proposed. Through the absorption heat transformer, low-temperature steam is upgraded into a higher energy level to match the temperature of CO 2 regeneration. Also, flue gas heat is partly recovered to preheat the circulating water from CO 2 capture process to further decrease system energy penalty. Aspen Plus 11.0 is used to simulate the system and parameters of key processes are validated by experimental values. It is shown that with 90% CO 2 capture, the thermal efficiency of the power plant with proposed CO 2 capture system is enhanced by 1.25 percentage points compared with traditional method. And the efficiency enhancement of the proposed system has a trend of increase first and then decrease with CO 2 capture rate growth. For a 350 MW coal-fired power plant, the optimum CO 2 capture rate is 53.65% and the corresponding efficiency enhancement is 2.06 percentage points. Exergy analysis shows that the exergy destruction in CO 2 separation and steam condensation process can decrease by 49.5% in the proposed system, and thereby the exergy efficiency is 1.85 percentage points higher than the conventional method. Furthermore, the cost of CO 2 avoided and cost of electricity of the proposed system will be reduced by 10.7 $/t-CO 2 and 1.9 $/MW h, respectively.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF