Search

Despite having multidimensional positive externalities of renewable energy (RE) in theory, the literature on RE's economic and environmental determinants is still very nascent. We have addressed this research gap by considering a balanced panel of 38 OECD nations attempting a phase-by-phase energy transition. We have used data spanning from 2000 to 2020 and deployed the novel method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) approach. Our results unveil that economic complexity reduces the consumption of renewable energy among the OECD nations, indicating that as the export becomes diversified, energy consumption at the production level becomes more dependent on non-renewable sources. This further suggests that OECD nations are yet to meet their renewable energy generation threshold. Moreover, energy efficiency fosters the consumption of renewable energy, substantiating that energy efficiency and renewable energy share complementary co-movement among the OECD nations. Furthermore, we unravel that environmental technology and natural resource rent have heterogeneous effects on renewable energy consumption in OECD. For instance, environmental technology only boosts RE consumption at the higher quantiles (70th to 95th), whereas revenue from natural resource rent curbs RE consumption. Our conclusions hold after a series of robustness checks. Overall, we propose that OECD nations should only export those products with absolute comparative advantage to reduce excessive dependence on fossils. Additionally, investment in renewable energy technology development should be escalated to ensure energy efficiency in the long-term. • The impacts of economic complexity (ECI), environmental technology (ENT), natural resource rent (NRT) and energy efficiency (EFX) on green energy use explored. • We use novel non-parametric method of moments quantile regression approach for OECD countries. • The ECI curbs the consumption of renewable energy while EFX is a boon for it. • ENT and NRT have heterogenous effects on RE consumption. • We also note different causal relationships to rectify the results' robustness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent decades, the use of fossil fuels has had a harsh impact on the climate, and the frequency and intensity of various extreme weather events have increased, which has triggered an increased the use of renewable energy sources and reflection on technological advances. Many countries are trying to promote renewable energy to reduce their impact on climate change, but the impact of national energy policies in the climate risk framework remains poorly understood. Based on the panel data of 84 developed/developing countries around the world from 2006 to 2019, this paper studies and analyzes the impact of renewable energy use on climate risk. The study found that the increase in the proportion of renewable energy use can reduce the climate risk, and this result is still robust after undergoing robustness tests such as changing variables, samples, and research methods. The findings offer an important solution for European countries, where climate risks are most acute. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the higher the level of economic development, population density and the lower the level of incorruptibility, the weaker the inhibitory effect of renewable energy use on climate risk. The mechanism analysis also shows that the increase in the proportion of renewable energy use can reduce climate risk by reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4), nitrogen monoxide (NO), PM2.5 emissions, and the proportion of fossil fuel use, but it does not reduce climate risk by increasing biodiversity. In particular, we find that technological progress has not played a role in the use of renewable energy to reduce climate risk, breaking the stereotype. The policy recommendation of this paper is that under the increasing pressure of climate change, the transition to clean energy is an indispensable option, and the need to accelerate the energy transition becomes more urgent. There is a greater need to further protect biodiversity and enhance technological progress. • The increase in the proportion of renewable energy use can reduce the climate risk. • The mechanism is to reduce CO 2 , CH 4 , NO, PM2.5 emissions and fossil fuels use. • The use of renewable energy cannot reduce climate risks by increasing biodiversity. • The impact of renewable energy use on climate risk is heterogeneous. • Technological progress has not played a role in the use of renewable energy to reduce climate risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]