Search

Stroke survivors with aphasia who participate in intensive post-acute aphasia rehabilitation programs make a variety of significant investments. As the number of Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs (ICAPs) increase across healthcare settings worldwide, patient perspectives of this innovative service delivery become increasingly important. Stakeholder perspectives can provide meaningful contributions to intervention implementation, growth, and sustainability. The purpose of this pilot study was to qualitatively explore patient perspectives about the experience of participating in a university-based ICAP implemented by graduate student clinicians. Researchers used an interpretive phenomenological approach to analyze nine structured interviews from five stroke survivors with aphasia who described their lived experiences during an ICAP. Thematic analysis involved an iterative and collaborative coding process. Transcripts were coded and themes were developed from the patients' shared perspectives. Trustworthiness was maximized through acknowledgement of the researchers' positionality and bias, variation in the sample, member checks, and sustained relationships between stakeholders. Three primary themes emerged from patient interviews: (1) the ICAP is hard work; (2) the impact of the ICAP on communication is noticeable, and (3) relationships "make" the ICAP. Themes support emerging evidence that ICAPs implemented by graduate student clinicians may be a worthwhile investment for many stroke survivors with aphasia, thereby contributing to the cost-benefit utility and implementation feasibility of this service delivery model. Stroke survivors with aphasia reported mixed levels of acceptability pertaining to the perceptible impact on communication improvement, and the challenging, rewarding, frequent, and varied opportunities to interact with others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While the field of speech-language pathology and medical education both provide training to improve the abilities of their students to communicate with patients, these fields rarely interact or collaborate with one another to maximise the effectiveness of this training. With a recent emphasis on the communication needs of patients with aphasia and other communication disorders in healthcare, and barriers these patients often face in accessing healthcare services, it has become increasingly important to review current research regarding patient–provider communication training, as well as what speech-language pathology and medical education can learn from one another in this area. Aims: The purpose of this literature review was (1) to examine the impact of communication disorders on patient–provider communication, (2) to identify gaps in current patient–provider communication training in medical education that speech-language pathology can help fill, and (3) to highlight innovations in medical education that may enhance the clinical training of speech-language pathology students. Main Contributions: There is a significant body of research to demonstrate the effectiveness of patient–provider communication training in medical education. However, research and training in this area often neglects patients with aphasia and other communication disorders, who are more vulnerable to medical errors and poorer health outcomes than patients without communication disorders. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are uniquely qualified to train other healthcare providers in communication techniques to use with patients with communication disorders. The field of speech-language pathology can also benefit from using patient–provider communication frameworks and standardised patients to improve student training and service delivery for patients with communication disorders. Conclusions: Collaboration between speech-language pathology and medical education can help to ensure the highest-quality healthcare services are offered to the patients they serve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]