Search

Purpose. The problem of this paper is to study the mutual influences of smart philosophies and methodologies of social sciences and humanities. The purpose of this article is to study the cognitive dialogue of philosophical ideas of Eastern Europe thinkers in the first half of the nineteenth century and the theoretical approaches of historical anthropology. The methodology of this work includes such intellectual approach as systematic and structural, interdisciplinary, source of study and comparative methods. Scientific novelty. Scientific novelty of the article is to analyse the cognitive interferences of different directions of philosophical searches and representative power of historical knowledge, historical anthropology. The reconstruction and study of cognitive dialogue of this area of historical science with the concepts of philosophy and the history of science, the philosophical basis of ethnic psychology, theories of the philosophy of culture were implemented. Conclusion. The cognitive dialogue of Eastern European philosophical research of the first half of the XX century and methodological approach of historical anthropology was materialized in the intellectual scheme, which includes a number of elements. These include: details, the creation of mental conditions for implementing this dialogue, detailing the program of dialogue, the creation of deployed interdisciplinary dialogue system of philosophical concepts and theoretical methods of historical anthropology.

The purpose of this work is to study the cognitive interferences philosophical and social sciences and humanities. The aim of the article is to analyze the cognitive interaction of historical anthropology and semiotics in the space of philosophical-cultural concepts Lotman. Methodology. The methodology of this work includes the theoretical approaches, such as system-structural method, interdisciplinary method, comparative and source study methods. Teoretical basis and results. Philosophy of Culture Lotman contains a large number of cognitive dimensions. Significant role in the cognitive universe of his work is semiotics and historical anthropology. However interaction of these semiotic components of Lotman creation little explored yet. The latter applies to the redesign of the historical-anthropological ideas and research scientist. Conclusions. Understanding the interaction of cognitive semiotics and historical anthropology in the space of culture philosophy of Lotman logically leads to the conclusion that the effectiveness of cognitive symbiosis methodological approaches these sciences. In particular, the cognitive structure allows us to study the underlying causes of the motives and actions of individuals and entire societies past. The realization of semiotic, historical and anthropological methods allows us to analyze the underlying mechanisms of the spiritual culture and social and cultural institutions of societies from different historical periods.

Purpose. The aim of this work is the intelligent reconstruction and the analysis of the various methodological approaches to cognitive areas of modern philosophy of history and determines their cognitive and academic relationships with conceptual terms of such branches of historical knowledge as historical anthropology. Methodology. Methodological tools of this work are such scientific approaches as methods of philosophy of science, interdisciplinary approach, methods of source and system analysis. Scientific novelty. Reproduced and analyzed was a number of methodological approaches inherent in the natural sciences and the social - the humanities. The latter, in accordance with the principles of interdisciplinary paradigm, is very widely applied by the modern philosophy of historical knowledge, in particular in the analysis of the historical process and its main elements: the mentality, attitudes and norms of socially significant and personal behavior of individuals and societies of the past. The influence of research on various historical and historical anthropological problems such concepts implanted in the methodology of modern philosophy of history scientific disciplines as chaos theory, synergetics, mathematical biology, ethnology, social psychology, etc. Focuses on intellectual connections are used in the philosophy of history, historical knowledge interdisciplinary methodology, theory and concepts of natural science and social - humanities. They are used to analyze and understand the complex and multifaceted historical events and processes. Conclusions. The result of the analysis of the cognitive dynamics applications in the philosophy of history of conceptual approaches of a very wide range of scientific disciplines has been the allocation of a number of phases of the mining process. Each of them has special logic - methodological and socio cultural characteristics ("Data"). Internal, cognitive science dynamics of this unity was not the aiming at the destruction of the previous intellectual tradition, but its deepening and updating on the basis of the implementation of more effective and diverse methodological approaches.

The purpose of the work is to study the impact of geographical, social and cultural context, mentality character-istics of historical process of society on the origin and characteristics of the development of intellectual achieve-ment, namely philosophy and science. The purpose of the article is to understand natural, historical, cultural, social and psychological aspects that led to the genesis of cognitive development peculiarities of ancient Greek philosophy of scientific knowledge. Methodology. Methodology of the work contains such cognitive approaches as systematic and structural ones, source study and post-positivist concepts, the theory of local civilizations. Theoretical basis and results: the novelty of this work is in studying the diverse factors that determined the emergence and dynamics of ancient Greek philosophical thought and science as a whole system of interrelated elements. The influence on the genesis of philosophy and science of ancient Hellas, its geographical conditions and geopolitical situation as well as the cultural dialogue with surrounding civilizations, the reception of historical and cultural experience of the previ-ous Hellenic civilization, historical process and mentality of ancient Greeks have been analyzed. Conclusions: the whole cluster of the above mentioned factors had a profound and multi-directional influence on the formation and development of Greek philosophy and science. In addition, each of the factors influenced the original intellectual achievements of Greeks. In particular, the influence of natural factors realized in the formation of skills in the men-tality of ancient Greeks has become a prerequisite for philosophizing and scientific knowledge. Geo-political, social and cultural factors have contributed to the geographical expansion of ancient Greeks and their information acquisi-tion about the world. Through the dialogue with other eastern and Mediterranean cultures Greeks mastered intellec-tually rich and meaningful experience of a number of great civilizations. The precursor forms of intellectual activity have played a significant role in the genesis of ancient Greek philosophy and science. Synergy interaction of these factors has led to rapid development of philosophy and science of ancient Hellas.

Цель. Проблемой данной работы является изучение воздействия географического и социокультурного контекста, особенностей ментальности исторического процесса социума на зарождение и характерные черты развития интеллектуальных достижений, в частности, философии и науки. Цель статьи заключается в осмыслении совокупности природных, исторических, культурных, социально-психологических факторов, которые обусловили генезис особенности когнитивного развития древнегреческой философии научного познания. Методология. Методология данной работы содержит познавательные подходы: системно-структурный, источниковедческий и постпозитивистский концепты, теория локальных цивилизаций. Научная новизна. Новизна данной работы заключается в исследовании разнородных факторов, предопределивших возникновение и динамику древнегреческих философской мысли и науки как целостной системы взаимосвязанных элементов. Проанализировано влияние на генезис философии и науки древней Эллады ее географических условий, геополитического положения, культурного диалога с окружающими цивилизациями, рецепции исторического и культурного опыта предыдущей эллинской цивилизации, исторического процесса и ментальности древних эллинов. Выводы. Весь кластер указанных выше факторов оказал глубокое и разнонаправленное влияние на становление и развитие древнегреческих философии и науки. При этом каждый из факторов проявил оригинальное воздействие на интеллектуальные достижения эллинов. В частности, влияние природных факторов реализовалось в формировании в ментальности древних греков навыков, ставших предпосылкой философствования и научного познания. Геополитический и социокультурный факторы способствовали географической экспансии древних греков и получение ими разнообразной информации об окружающем мире. Благодаря диалогу с другими культурами Средиземноморья и Востока эллины освоили интеллектуально богатый и содержательный опыт целого ряда великих цивилизаций. Значительную роль в генезисе древнегреческой философии и науки сыграли предшествующие им формы интеллектуальной деятельности. Синергия взаимодействия данных факторов обусловила возникновение и интенсивное развитие философия и науки деревней Эллады.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the influence of theoretical approaches to the philosophical concepts of culture M. M. Bakhtin on the genesis and implementation of historical and anthropological concepts and renovations mentality and socio-cultural characteristics and behavior of individuals and societies of the past. Methodology. Methodological tools are methods of system and source analyses. Theoretical basis and results: analyzes the concept of the philosophy of culture such M.M. Bakhtin as a carnival, folk culture, culture of humor, doubleworld, concept social-cultural projection material and cultural bottom and its impact on the culture of laughter European Middle Ages and Renaissance. Methodological approaches Bakhtin recreated for historical and anthropological reconstruction mentality and socio-cultural realities of the high Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Investigated the perception of philosophical and cultural concepts M. M. Bakhtin, the scientific community and their impact on the historical and anthropological studies. It was also analyzed the influence of the respective ideas M.M. Bakhtin's historical and anthropological studies of the last quarter of XX - beginning of XXI century. in particular on the work of D. Likhachev, A. Gurevich, E. Thompson and other researchers. Conclusion: concept of the philosophy of culture, MM Bakhtin, in particular, the culture of humor, the popular perception of the world, carnival, social and cultural doubleworld, reconstruction of the domestic foundations of culture laughter Europe era high Middle Ages and the Renaissance were one of the most important conceptual elements in the study of the mentality of socially significant behavior and daily life as these periods, so or any other, from the early Middle Ages to the present.

We study the logical and methodological aspects of historical and anthropological studies in the twentieth and the beginning of the XXI centuryИзучаются логико-методологические аспекты развития историко-антропологических исследований в ХХ-начале XXI вв.Вивчаються логіко-методологічні аспекти розвитку історично-антропологічних студій у ХХ-на початку ХХІ ст.