Search

Background/aim: Recently, the prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI) was developed and reported to be a promising nutritional and inflammatory prognostic marker. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical impact of the PINI for esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and collected data on consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative resection at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020. The PINI was calculated by dividing the serum ALB concentration (g/dl) by the serum monocyte concentration, both of which were measured before surgery., Results: A total of 180 patients were included in this study. The cutoff value of the PINI was 3.0 in the present study. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 45.2% and 33.5%, respectively, in the PINI-low subgroup, and 69.1% and 61.8%, respectively, in the PINI-high subgroup. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PINI was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio=2.091, 95% confidence interval=1.287-3.399, p=0.003). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. When comparing the sites of recurrence between the two groups, the incidence of hematological recurrence was significantly greater in the PINI-low subgroup compared to the PINI-high subgroup (46.8% vs. 21.1%, p<0.001)., Conclusion: The PINI is a promising nutritional and inflammatory marker for esophageal cancer patients. The PINI might be a useful marker for the treatment and management of esophageal cancer patients., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a promising biomarker. We clarified the clinical impact of the CALLY index in gastric cancer patients who received curative treatment., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University from 2005 to 2020 were selected based on medical records. The CALYY index was calculated as follows: serum ALB level (g/dl) × lymphocyte count (cells/μl)/C-reactive protein (mg/dl) ×10 4 Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the present study. The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.8% and 57.0%, respectively, in the CALLY index-low group, and 86.2% and 78.2%, respectively, in the CALLY index-high group. There were significant differences between the two groups. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio=1.791; 95% confidence interval=1.067-3.009; p=0.028). When comparing the perioperative clinical course between the CALLY index-low and CALLY index-high groups, there were significant differences in postoperative surgical complications and adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusion: The CALLY score was an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. Our results suggest that the CALLY index is a promising tool for assessing inflammation and nutritional status in patients undergoing gastric cancer treatment and management., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: This study aimed to compare dietary intake (DI) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer between patients with (C group) and without (NC group) postoperative surgical complications., Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. DI was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire with 82 food items (FFQW82) during nutritional counseling before surgery and at one and three months after surgery., Results: A total of 225 patients participated in this study. Of the 225 patients, 193 had no postoperative complications, and 32 had postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2). The median DI at 1 month postoperatively was 1508 kcal/day in the NC group and 1,470.5 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.175). The median DI at 3 months postoperatively was 1,623 kcal/day in the NC group and 1575 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.473). There was a significant difference between the NC and C groups in the rate of decrease in DI at one month (median: -8.44% vs. -15.37%, p=0.032) and at three months postoperatively (median: -3.58% vs. -6.12%, p=0.038)., Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of decrease in DI after gastrectomy between the C and NC groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Our results suggest that patients with postoperative surgical complications require additional nutritional treatment for decreased DI., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Perioperative inflammation and the nutritional status affect both short- and long-term oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We clarified the clinical impacts of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in patients with esophageal cancer who received curative treatment., Patients and Methods: The present study included 180 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between a high-fibrinogen group and a low-fibrinogen group., Results: The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 50.0% and 42.6%, respectively, in the CALLY index-low group, and 75.9% and 66.6% in the CALLY index-high group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio=2.310, 95% confidence interval=1.416-3.767, p<0.001]. Similar results were observed in recurrence-free survival. When comparing the details of postoperative surgical complications, there was a significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 40.2% in the CALLY index-low group, while it was 27.5% in the CALLY index-high group (p=0.030)., Conclusion: The pretreatment CALLY index is one of the independent prognostic factors for esophageal cancer. The CALLY index might become a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of esophageal cancer., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Dietary intake (DI) loss after gastrectomy is a serious problem for patients with gastric cancer. This study compared the dietary intake after surgery in patients with early gastric cancer who received laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus those who underwent conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG)., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, observational study enrolling patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Dietary intake was assessed using the food frequency questionnaire with eighty-two food items (FFQW82) at nutritional counseling before surgery and one and three months after surgery., Results: A total of 118 patients were included. Among them, 69 (58.5%) were male, and 49 (41.5%) were female. Seventy-five (63.6%) received LDG, and 43 (36.4%) received ODG. At 1 month postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,540 (1,014-2,195) kcal/day, whereas that in the ODG group was 1547 (986-2,143) kcal/day (p=0.891). At 3 months postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,624 (1,050-2,443) kcal/day, and that in the ODG group was 1,652 (917-2,144) kcal/day (p=0.749). There was no significant difference in the DI loss rate at 1 month (median: -8.2% vs. -9.3%, p=0.398) and 3 months (median: -3.2% vs. -3.7%, p=0.635) between the LDG and ODG groups., Conclusion: Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery may not prevent postoperative DI loss after distal gastrectomy. Therefore, methods other than laparoscopic surgery are needed to prevent post-gastrectomy DI loss., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: We evaluated the clinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients who received curative treatment and perioperative adjuvant treatment. We also investigated the association between the GNRI and the clinicopathological features of patients with GC., Patients and Methods: This study included 280 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of the high-GNRI and low-GNRI groups were compared., Results: In the GNRI-high group, the overall survival (OS) rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly lower (82.7% and 77.9%, respectively) than those in the GNRI-low group (56.4% and 40.8%). The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for OS. The GNRI was also a significant prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 79.1% and 74.8%, respectively, in the GNRI-high group, and 48.0% and 38.6% in the GNRI-low group. The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for RFS. The GNRI was also found to affect the postoperative clinical course, including postoperative surgical complications and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusion: The GNRI may be a promising prognostic and predictive factor for gastric cancer. In the future, the GNRI may be used to select optimal treatment strategies., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: To determine the clinical significance of pre-treatment circumferential tumor location within the esophageal wall in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent curative resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients (n=96) with cStage IB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent curative resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were categorized into two groups based on the circumferential tumor location within the esophageal wall on diagnostic endoscopy: left or anterior wall group (L/A patients, n=49); right or posterior wall group (R/P patients, n=47). Analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between circumferential tumor location, clinicopathological characteristics, 3-year overall survival (3Y-OS), and 3-year recurrence-free survival (3Y-RFS)., Results: The lymph node status and recurrence rates of mediastinal lymph node metastases were significantly higher in patients with L/A than in patients with R/P. Furthermore, patients with L/A had significantly poorer 3Y-OS and 3Y-RFS than those with R/P. Tumor location within the esophageal wall was identified in multivariate analysis as an independent risk factor for 3Y-RFS (hazard ratio=2.92, 95% confidence interval=1.35-6.32, p=0.0064)., Conclusion: Pre-treatment of circumferential tumor located within the esophageal wall may be a useful prognostic factor in patients with cStageIB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent curative resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with various cancers and affects the long-term prognosis of patients. After gastrectomy for gastric cancer, dynamic changes in body composition occur, and sarcopenia becomes more apparent after surgery than before surgery. However, the relationship between sarcopenia in the early postoperative period and long-term survival is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of surgical sarcopenia on long-term outcomes of patents with gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: We included 408 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy (distal or total gastrectomy) for gastric cancer at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from December 2013 to November 2017. Sarcopenia was defined using the skeletal muscle index (SMI), using computed tomography (CT) one month after gastrectomy. We compared the long-term outcomes between patients with and without sarcopenia., Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.2% and 91.4% in the surgical and non-surgical sarcopenia groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) of surgical sarcopenia for OS was 2.410 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.321-4.396). In addition, surgical sarcopenia was associated with non-cancer-related deaths and deaths from other cancers., Conclusion: Patients with surgical sarcopenia after gastrectomy should be carefully monitored not only for gastric cancer recurrence but also for the occurrence of other diseases, including other cancers., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is a promising tool for the evaluation of the perioperative hepatic function. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative ALBI status in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment., Patients and Methods: The present study included 244 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified., Results: Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rates, we set the cut-off value for the ALBI score at -2.7849. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.3% and 80.9%, respectively, in the ALBI-low group, and 66.9% and 60.6% in the ALBI-high group; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). The ALBI score was included in the final multivariate analysis model [Hazard ratio (HR)=2.120, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177-3.818, p=0.012]. Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the ALBI score correlated with the introduction of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusion: The preoperative ALBI score correlated with both the OS and RFS of GC patients as well as the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Taken together, the ALBI score is a promising prognostic factor for GC., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Perioperative systemic inflammation affects the long-term oncological outcomes in cases of malignancies. We evaluated the clinical impact of the preoperative systemic inflammation score (SIS) in resectable esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment., Patients and Methods: This study included 168 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified., Results: Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rate, we set the cut-off value for SIS at 2 in the preset study. Among the 168 total patients, 119 were categorized as the Low-SIS group, and 49 were categorized as the High-SIS group. The respective 3- and 5-year OS rates were 61.9% and 52.4% in the Low-SIS group and 33.3% and 26.6% in the High-SIS group. There were significant differences in OS (p<0.001). The SIS was therefore selected for the final multivariate analysis model (hazard ratio=2.094, 95% confidence interval=1.355-3.234, p<0.001). On comparing the perioperative clinical course between the High- and Low-SIS groups, there were significant differences in the rate of postoperative anastomosis leakage of grade ≥2 between the groups (61.5% in the High-SIS group vs. 30.3% in the Low-SIS group; p=0.021)., Conclusion: The systemic inflammation score had a clinical effect on the long-term oncological outcomes in esophageal cancer patients, suggesting that it might be a promising prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The number of patients who have cardiovascular-morbidities and use antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy is rapidly growing worldwide. The present study evaluated the safety and feasibility of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients who received antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy in the perioperative period., Patients and Methods: Cases were selected from the medical records of consecutive patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent complete resection at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from 2013 to 2017. The patients were divided into the antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment group and the non-antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment group., Results: Five hundred and six patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer and were analyzed in the present study. Among them, 62 patients (12.3%) received anticoagulation therapy (anticoagulation group). When the anticoagulation and non-anticoagulation groups were compared, although there were some differences in patient background factors, the surgical findings, perioperative clinical course, and details of postoperative complications were similar. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 0.8% (4/506) in all patients. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 1.6% (1/62) in the anticoagulation group and 0.7% (3/446) in the non-anticoagulation group. Preoperative anticoagulation therapy was not identified as a significant independent risk factor for postoperative bleeding., Conclusion: These results suggest that curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible, regardless of the perioperative use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment. In addition, the perioperative use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment was not a significant risk factor for postoperative bleeding after gastrectomy for gastric cancer., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

The standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancer is surgical resection and perioperative adjuvant treatment. Multidisciplinary treatment for gastrointestinal cancer leads to body composition changes. Body composition changes, such as skeletal muscle loss and body weight loss, during multidisciplinary treatment result in poor physical activity, severe toxicity of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and poor oncological outcomes. Therefore, the hypothesis is that minimization of body composition changes during multidisciplinary treatment in gastrointestinal cancer patients, the continuation of postoperative adjuvant treatment in these patients might improve, thereby improving the oncological outcomes. Given this hypothesis, recent studies have focused on introducing perioperative oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients. Thus far, oral nutritional treatment has proven promising and showed some clinical benefits for gastrointestinal cancer patients during the perioperative period. However, whether or not oral nutritional treatment has clinical benefits on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer remains unclear. To optimize oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients, it is necessary to clarify the benefits of oral nutritional treatment on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastric cancer patients and establish the optimal approach to oral nutritional treatment.

Aim: We examined whether the perioperative systemic inflammation score (SIS), which describes systemic inflammation and/or malnutrition, affected the tumor recurrence and survival in advanced gastric cancer patients., Patients and Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed 160 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent curative resection at the Kanagawa Cancer Center. The SIS was evaluated before surgery, one week after surgery and one month after surgery, as determined by the serum albumin level (cut-off value=4.0 g/dl) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (cut-off value=4.44)., Results: A high SIS at one month after surgery was identified as an independent predictor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=2.143, p=0.020] and showed a marginal significance for the relapse-free survival (HR=1.814, p=0.053) in multivariate analyses., Conclusion: The SIS at one month after surgery is a useful biomarker for predicting the long-term outcome in patients with advanced gastric cancer., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)