Search

The present study evaluated the clinical impact of other metachronous or synchronous primary cancer (OPC) in patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer.The present study included 168 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. Prognosis and differences between the OPC status (metachronous/synchronous) and clinic pathological parameters was analyzed.A total of 168 patients were included in this study. Forty patients were diagnosed with metachronous/synchronous OPC. When comparing the clinicopathological factors between the patients with and without OPC, the patients' background and postoperative clinical courses were very similar between the two groups. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with esophageal cancer with OPC were 66.0% and 54.5%, respectively, while those in patients without OPC were 50.1% and 41.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in these rates (p=0.156). The OPC status was not included in the final multivariate analysis model.The OPC status was not found to be a prognostic factor for patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid performing curative treatment for esophageal cancer because of a patient's OPC status.

Perioperative systemic inflammation affects the long-term oncological outcomes in cases of malignancies. We evaluated the clinical impact of the preoperative systemic inflammation score (SIS) in resectable esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment.This study included 168 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified.Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rate, we set the cut-off value for SIS at 2 in the preset study. Among the 168 total patients, 119 were categorized as the Low-SIS group, and 49 were categorized as the High-SIS group. The respective 3- and 5-year OS rates were 61.9% and 52.4% in the Low-SIS group and 33.3% and 26.6% in the High-SIS group. There were significant differences in OS (p0.001). The SIS was therefore selected for the final multivariate analysis model (hazard ratio=2.094, 95% confidence interval=1.355-3.234, p0.001). On comparing the perioperative clinical course between the High- and Low-SIS groups, there were significant differences in the rate of postoperative anastomosis leakage of grade ≥2 between the groups (61.5% in the High-SIS group vs. 30.3% in the Low-SIS group; p=0.021).The systemic inflammation score had a clinical effect on the long-term oncological outcomes in esophageal cancer patients, suggesting that it might be a promising prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients.

This prospective multi-central randomized phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral Vitamin B12 500 μg/day replacement compared with oral Vitamin B12 1,500 μg/day in patients with Vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral Vitamin B12 500 μg/day or Vitamin B12 1,500 μg/day in a 1:1 ratio with a minimization method. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a normal serum Vitamin B12 level at three months after treatment.From January 2018 to December 2021, 3 institutions collaborated with the present study, and 74 patients were registered from these 3 institutions. The study was prematurely closed due to poor accrual after reaching almost 50% of its goal. Among the 74 recruited patients, 36 were allocated to the Vitamin B12 500 μg/day arm and 38 to Vitamin B12 1,500 μg/day arm. The incidences of patients with a normal Vitamin B12 level at 3 months (serum Vitamin B12 level200 pg/ml) were 91.7% (33/36) in the Vitamin B12 500 μg/day arm and 100% (38/38) in the Vitamin B12 1,500 μg/day arm (p=0.3587). The types of clinical symptoms with Vitamin B12 deficiency that improved with Vitamin B12 treatment and the degree of improvement were also similar.Although the primary endpoint of the present study was not met, it was found that oral Vitamin B12 500 μg/day replacement is as effective and safe as oral Vitamin B12 1,500 μg/day replacement for Vitamin B12 deficiency.

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is a promising tool for the evaluation of the perioperative hepatic function. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative ALBI status in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment.The present study included 244 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified.Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rates, we set the cut-off value for the ALBI score at -2.7849. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.3% and 80.9%, respectively, in the ALBI-low group, and 66.9% and 60.6% in the ALBI-high group; these differences were statistically significant (p0.001). The ALBI score was included in the final multivariate analysis model [Hazard ratio (HR)=2.120, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177-3.818, p=0.012]. Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the ALBI score correlated with the introduction of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.The preoperative ALBI score correlated with both the OS and RFS of GC patients as well as the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Taken together, the ALBI score is a promising prognostic factor for GC.

Background/aim The number of patients who have cardiovascular-morbidities and use antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy is rapidly growing worldwide. The present study evaluated the safety and feasibility of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients who received antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy in the perioperative period. Patients and methods Cases were selected from the medical records of consecutive patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent complete resection at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from 2013 to 2017. The patients were divided into the antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment group and the non-antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment group. Results Five hundred and six patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer and were analyzed in the present study. Among them, 62 patients (12.3%) received anticoagulation therapy (anticoagulation group). When the anticoagulation and non-anticoagulation groups were compared, although there were some differences in patient background factors, the surgical findings, perioperative clinical course, and details of postoperative complications were similar. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 0.8% (4/506) in all patients. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 1.6% (1/62) in the anticoagulation group and 0.7% (3/446) in the non-anticoagulation group. Preoperative anticoagulation therapy was not identified as a significant independent risk factor for postoperative bleeding. Conclusion These results suggest that curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible, regardless of the perioperative use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment. In addition, the perioperative use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment was not a significant risk factor for postoperative bleeding after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

The standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancer is surgical resection and perioperative adjuvant treatment. Multidisciplinary treatment for gastrointestinal cancer leads to body composition changes. Body composition changes, such as skeletal muscle loss and body weight loss, during multidisciplinary treatment result in poor physical activity, severe toxicity of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and poor oncological outcomes. Therefore, the hypothesis is that minimization of body composition changes during multidisciplinary treatment in gastrointestinal cancer patients, the continuation of postoperative adjuvant treatment in these patients might improve, thereby improving the oncological outcomes. Given this hypothesis, recent studies have focused on introducing perioperative oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients. Thus far, oral nutritional treatment has proven promising and showed some clinical benefits for gastrointestinal cancer patients during the perioperative period. However, whether or not oral nutritional treatment has clinical benefits on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer remains unclear. To optimize oral nutritional treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients, it is necessary to clarify the benefits of oral nutritional treatment on the long-term oncological outcomes in gastric cancer patients and establish the optimal approach to oral nutritional treatment.

Background Body weight, especially lean body mass, significantly decreases after gastrectomy. Postoperative surgical complications are a major risk factor for changes in body weight and body composition after gastrectomy. However, the influence of postoperative surgical complications after gastrectomy on body weight and body composition changes remains unclear. Patients and methods This retrospective study examined patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer between May 2010 and February 2017. Their body weight and composition were evaluated by a bioelectrical impedance analyzer within 1 week before surgery, and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. Patients were classified as those with surgical complications and those without. Results Eight hundred and eighty-eight patients (156 in the group with complications and 732 in the group without) were entered in the present study. When comparing the two groups, the patients' background and surgical factors significantly differed, while the pathological findings were similar. The body weight losses at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery were 3.8%, 7.0%, and 10.4%, respectively, in those with complications, and 3.3%, 5.6%, and 6.8%, respectively, in the group without, with p-values of 0.001, 0.002, and 0.001, respectively. The corresponding lean body mass losses were 3.7%, 6.5%, and 6.8%, and 3.2%, 4.2%, and 3.5%, respectively, with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. Conclusion Decreases in body weight and lean body mass after gastrectomy were more serious in the patients with surgical complications than in those without. To maintain body weight and lean body mass in patients with surgical complications, additional care or treatments are needed.