Search

Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer death. Current standard treatments include surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy but patient's prognosis remains poor and present severe side-effects. Contemporary oncology found a wide variety of novel anticancer drugs that regulate the epigenetic mechanisms of tumor genesis. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are enzymes with pleiotropic activities that control critical functions of the cell through regulation of the acetylation states of histone proteins and other non-histone protein targets. They are divided into four groups, each with different localization in the cell, role and structure. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) are substances, which inhibit the function of HDACs. We recognize four leading groups (hydroxamic acid, cyclic tetrapeptide, benzamide, aliphatic acid). There are many HDACIs currently in pre-clinical and two (vorinostat, romidepsin) in clinical stages of investigation for pancreatic cancer. Numerous studies argue for the use HDACIs as monotherapy, others suggest that combination of HDACIs with other antitumor drugs has better therapeutic results. This review focuses on the use of HDACIs as novel anticancer drugs and will explain the mechanisms of therapeutic effect on pancreatic cancer., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Aim: This review focuses on nuclear receptors expressed in pancreatic cancer., Materials and Methods: An extensive search of articles published up to March 2013 was conducted using the MEDLINE database. The key words used were "pancreatic cancer", "molecular receptors" and "growth factors". A total of 112 articles referred to pancreatic cancer, molecular receptors and/or growth factors were included., Results: Receptors of growth factors, such as the epithelial growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and others, such as integrin α5β1, somatostatin receptors, the death receptor 5, claudin, notch receptors, mesothelin receptors, follicle-stimulating hormone receptors, the MUC1 receptor, the adrenomedullin receptor, the farnesoid X receptor, the transferrin receptor, sigma-2 receptors, the chemokine receptor CXCR4, the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, the ephrine A2 receptor, the GRIA3 receptor, the RON receptor and the angiotensin II receptor AT-1 are expressed in pancreatic tumor cells. These molecules are implicated in tumor growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, metastasis etc., Conclusion: After identifying the molecular receptors associated with the pancreatic cancer, many more target molecules playing important roles in tumor pathophysiology and senescence-associated signal transduction in cancer cells will be identified. This may have a significant influence on diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of pancreatic cancer., (Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Several surgical approaches have been used for radical nephrectomy for large and locally advanced tumors of the right kidney., Aim: To present our experience with radical nephrectomy using a right subcostal incision with a transperitoneal approach in patients with very large tumors of the right kidney., Patients and Methods: Between 2003 and 2010, 34 patients with very large tumors of the right kidney were submitted to surgery. Eighteen patients underwent a transperitoneal approach with a right subcostal incision (intervention group) and 16 patients were operated on with retroperitoneal flank incision (control group)., Results: No significant complications during surgery were observed in the intervention group; two patients needed blood transfusions of 300 cc during the first postoperative day. In the control group, injury of the renal vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) was a relatively common complication; five patients needed blood transfusions of 300 cc during the first postoperative day., Conclusion: A transperitoneal right subcostal incision for radical nephrectomy in patients with large and locally advanced tumors of the right kidney seems to offer better access to the renal pedicle, and to the great vessels of the area as well as better exposure of the organs of the abdominal cavity. This approach could be more useful in cases in which liver involvement is possible.

The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil is considered to be one of the reference regimens for advanced gastric cancer, but due to its major myelotoxicity, its use in clinical practice has become limited. This prospective phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a modified regimen with lower doses of docetaxel and cisplatin combined with oral capecitabine instead of fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Treatment consisted of docetaxel at 60 mg/m(2) i.v. followed by cisplatin at 60 mg/m(2), both administered on day one, every three weeks. Capecitabine at 2 g/m(2) per day was administered in two divided doses for 14 days (days 2-15). Thirty six patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 64 years and performance status (ECOG) was 0-1. All patients had advanced disease, 78% with liver metastases, 100% with intra-abdominal lymph node metastases and 67% with peritoneal implants. Out of the 36 patients, 13 had undergone gastric resection, 13 had received adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan-leucovorin-fluorouracil, while seven patients had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy. The remaining 23 patients presented with advanced inoperable disease. Among 36 evaluable for response cases, there were 16 (44.4%) (Confidence Internal (CI) 95%=28-60%), partial responses. Stable disease was recorded in 12 (33.3%), resulting in an overall disease control rate of 78% (CI 95%=69-87%), while 8 (22.3%) patients progressed on chemotherapy. The median response duration was 6 (range=3-8) months. The median time-to-progression was 5 (range=3-6) months and the median survival (after the administration of a second-line chemotherapy in 12 patients), was 12 (range=5-24) months. Myelotoxocity was the main toxicity, with grade 3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18 (50%) and febrile neutropenia in six (16%) patients. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) support was given to 16 (44.4%) patients, while grade 3 thrombocytopenia was recorded in two (6%). In conclusion, this modified regimen of docetaxel-cisplatin-capecitabine appears to have comparable efficacy with that reported for the reference regimen, with acceptable toxicity when G-CSF support is provided. However, because due to the small size of the study, further investigation is warranted.

Background: The role of combination chemotherapy regimens in the management of ovarian cancer patients with tumors previously exposed to platinum compounds and paclitaxel has not yet been defined. The present phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin combination in the aforementioned group of patients. Given the in vitro and in vivo synergism between the three agents, it was believed that using a three-drug combination would overcome tumor resistance to cisplatin., Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 56 years and the median performance status 1. Eight (34%) had potentially platinum-sensitive, 6 (24%) had primary platinum-resistant and 10 (42%) patients had secondary platinum-resistant tumors. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) i.v. over 2 h fractionated over days 8 and 9, and ifosfamide 5 mg/m(2) i.v. over 1 h fractionated on days 8-9 with mesna uroprotection. Courses were administered every 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day on days 10-14. A median of 4 cycles were administered with the delivered dose intensity at 85% of the planned dose for the three agents., Results: Among 24 patients evaluable for response and toxicity, there were 8 partial responses with a response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval 16.4-55%). Stable disease was recorded in 6 (25.7) and progressive disease in 10 (42%) patients. Subgroup analysis revealed a response rate of 50% in potentially platinum-sensitive, 16.5% in primary platinum-resistant and 30% in secondary platinum-resistant tumors. The median response duration was 5 months (range 3-12 months), the median time to progression 6 months (range 3-16 months) and the median survival 12 months (range 3-24 months). Myelotoxicity was significant, with neutropenia grade 3 and 4 occurring in 35% and 20% of patients, respectively. Four episodes (3.5% of all cycles) of febrile neutropenia were documented and were well managed with oral antibiotics and G-CSF continuation until complete recovery. Grade 1, 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy developed in 40%, 30%, and 10% of patients, respectively., Conclusion: The three-drug combination demonstrated a significant effectiveness in potentially platinum-sensitive tumors and a moderate efficacy in platinum-resistant tumors. The regimen, although myelotoxic, is tolerable with G-CSF support. Further investigation via comparative studies is required to define any superiority of the present regimen over doublets of the three agents in this group of patients.