Search

Background/aim: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly a disease of the elderly. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with mCRC., Patients and Methods: We recruited mCRC patients aged ≥75 years who were treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy from October 2011 to November 2020. Primary outcome was median progression-free survival (PFS) and incidence of adverse events, while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), relative dose intensity (RDI) and tumor response rate., Results: The study enrolled 41 patients with mCRC aged ≥75 years. Median PFS and OS were 9.3 months and 38.9 months, respectively. Median rate of starting dose per standard dose and median RDI of L-OHP were 94.6% [interquartile range (IQR)=80.0-100] and 52.4% (IQR=30.2-71.1), respectively. The most common adverse events of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (21.4%), high blood pressure (16.7%), and anorexia (14.3%)., Conclusion: Although the RDI of L-OHP drug was low, the PFS, OS, and incidence of adverse events were similar to previous reports of oxaliplatin-based regimens not limited to the elderly. Oxaliplatin-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy may be safely and effectively adapted to patients aged ≥75 years with mCRC by continuing chemotherapy with implementation of a reduction and discontinuation of anticancer drugs depending on adverse events., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Although combination chemotherapy with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and bevacizumab (BEV) is highly effective for metastatic unresectable colorectal cancer (mCRC), this combination chemotherapy often induces nausea and vomiting. To identify risk factors for nausea and vomiting, we investigated the occurrence of nausea and vomiting in mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 and BEV., Patients and Methods: Study patients with mCRC received TAS-102 and BEV between March 2016 and December 2021. The status of nausea, vomiting, and antiemetic measures in each course were investigated, and factors involved in the occurrence of nausea and vomiting were analysed by logistic regression analysis., Results: Data from 57 patients were analysed. The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting during the overall period were 57.9% and 17.5%, respectively. Nausea and vomiting were frequent not only in the early courses but also after the sixth course. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the experience of nausea and vomiting in previous treatment with other agents was significantly associated with nausea and vomiting with TAS-102 and BEV., Conclusion: The experience of nausea and vomiting in previous treatment was associated with increased risk for nausea and vomiting in mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 and BEV., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Mirtazapine, which exerts an antagonistic effect on 5-hydroxytryptamine type 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , 5-HT 3 and H 1 receptors, is considered useful for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine for the prevention of CINV in patients with thoracic cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with thoracic cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with 15 mg mirtazapine once daily as a prophylactic antiemetic drug between January 2014 and December 2021. The effects of mirtazapine added to the standard antiemetic regimen for the prevention of CINV were evaluated in patients who had poor control of CINV in a preceding cycle and in patients who received the standard antiemetic therapy plus mirtazapine from their first cycle., Results: A total of 35 patients were evaluated. Of these, 14 had poor control of CINV in a preceding cycle and received the standard antiemetic therapy plus mirtazapine in the next cycle. The rate of complete response in the delayed period in these patients was significantly improved from the preceding cycle to the next cycle (35.7% vs. 85.7%, p=0.018). In contrast, the other 21 patients had received the standard antiemetic regimen plus mirtazapine from the first cycle. The rate of complete response in the delayed period in these patients receiving the triplet antiemetic regimen plus mirtazapine as part of a cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based regimen and in patients receiving a doublet antiemetic regimen plus mirtazapine in a carboplatin-based regimen was 100%, 85.7% and 100%, respectively. No severe adverse events, including somnolence, were observed with the addition of mirtazapine., Conclusion: The addition of mirtazapine to the standard antiemetic regimen for CINV may be beneficial with acceptable safety when administered in association with platinum-based regimens to patients with thoracic cancer., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed to determine the previously unclarified association of osimertinib plasma trough concentrations with efficacy, adverse events, and genetic polymorphisms in Japanese patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations., Patients and Methods: In this prospective study, blood samples of 25 patients who received osimertinib were collected to measure plasma osimertinib concentrations and to genotypically characterize ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 polymorphisms. Plasma osimertinib concentrations were analyzed using validated multiple reaction monitoring mode-based liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Osimertinib concentration necessary to achieve optimal median progression-free survival (PFS) was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. PFS and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and between-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Plasma osimertinib concentrations between different patient groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test., Results: Patients were divided into high and low concentration groups based on a plasma osimertinib cut-off concentration of 211 ng/ml. Median PFS was longer in the high trough concentration group than that in the low trough concentration group (46.3 vs. 16.8 months, p=0.029). Plasma osimertinib concentrations adjusted for dose and body weight did not differ between the patients with and without variant polymorphisms., Conclusion: Monitoring plasma trough concentrations during maintenance might improve osimertinib treatment efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Although peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common adverse event in patients treated with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy (1st-OX) for advanced gastric cancer, the effect of PN on the efficacy of paclitaxel at second-line chemotherapy (2nd-PTX) remains unclear. We investigated the association between PN induced by 1st-OX and efficacy of 2nd-PTX in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC)., Patients and Methods: The study subjects were patients with AGC who received 1st-OX followed by 2nd-PTX at Gifu University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. Primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) of 2nd-PTX. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), response rate and adverse events during the period of 2nd-PTX. The association between incidence of grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (G2PN) and TTF or OS was also evaluated using Cox proportional hazards analysis., Results: A total of 54 patients with AGC who received 1st-OX followed by 2nd-PTX were eligible. Incidence rates of G2PN at the start of 2nd-PTX was 20.3% (11/54). Median duration of TTF and OS were not significantly longer in patients with G2PN than in those without it (TTF: 4.7 months vs. 3.7 months, p=0.264, OS: 10.6 months vs. 8.5 months, p=0.706). Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that there was no significant relationship between the incidence of G2PN and TTF, or between the incidence of G2PN and OS. However, development of grade ≥3 PN was significantly higher in patients with G2PN than in those without it (45.5% vs. 2.3%, p<0.001)., Conclusion: G2PN induced by 1st-OX may not affect efficacy of 2nd-PTX in patients with AGC but could be a risk for grade ≥3 PN of 2nd-PTX., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Nausea and vomiting are two of the most distressing adverse events of cancer radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to examine the control rate and risk factors associated with nausea and vomiting in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study examined patients with cervical cancer who received radiotherapy alone or with concomitant cisplatin. Patients who received radiotherapy alone were not administered antiemetic premedication, while patients who received radiotherapy with concomitant weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m 2 ) were administered antiemetic therapy comprising granisetron and dexamethasone. Risk factors for non-complete response (CR) were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis., Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that younger age and concomitant weekly cisplatin were significant factors associated with non-CR across 5 weeks of treatment in patients who received radiotherapy. The proportion achieving CR among younger patients (<65 years) who received radiotherapy alone or with concomitant cisplatin was significantly lower than that among older patients (≥65 years) (Concomitant cisplatin: 27% vs. 67%, p=0.049; Radiotherapy alone: 62% vs. 91%, p=0.166). However, the proportion of patients achieving CR across 5 weeks of treatment was insufficient in all groups except for those aged ≥ 65 years who received radiotherapy alone., Conclusion: Antiemetic prophylaxis should be considered for younger patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy alone. Further, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist should be added to 5-hydroxytryptamine type-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylactic therapy for patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy with concomitant weekly doses of 40 mg/m 2 cisplatin., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: To clarify the risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with GnP therapy, gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), we compared CINV between GEM and GnP therapy., Patients and Methods: Patients who had received an initial course of GEM and GnP therapy were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the incidence of nausea, and secondary endpoints were the incidence of vomiting and rescue. In addition, the association between nausea and combination therapy with GEM and nab-PTX was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for covariates. All patients received anti-cancer drugs under guideline-consistent, low-risk antiemetic measures., Results: Data from 105 patients were analyzed (GEM group, 44 patients; GnP group, 61 patients). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and rescue did not significantly differ between the two groups during the acute, delayed or overall periods. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that combination therapy with GEM and nab-PTX was not significantly associated with nausea compared to GEM alone., Conclusion: Under guideline-consistent, low-risk antiemetic measures, GnP therapy-induced nausea and vomiting can be controlled similarly to when induced by GEM., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: We evaluated the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (PEG) for febrile neutropenia (FN) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving amrubicin (AMR)., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with SCLC receiving AMR as second-line therapy., Results: A total of 33 patients were treated with AMR (no PEG group), while 13 patients were treated with AMR plus prophylactic administration of PEG (PEG group). The severity of neutropenia was significantly reduced in the PEG group compared to the no PEG group (p=0.02). The incidence of FN in the no PEG and PEG groups was 27.3% and 7.7%, respectively. The time to development of FN tended to be longer in the PEG group compared to the no PEG group (p=0.132)., Conclusion: Primary prophylaxis with PEG may be beneficial in reducing the risk of FN in patients with SCLC receiving AMR., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: We compared the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI with bevacizumab (Bmab) or aflibercept (AFL) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to clarify selection criteria for anti-angiogenic agents., Patients and Methods: The subjects were patients with mCRC who received second-line FOLFIRI in combination with Bmab or AFL. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were median time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events., Results: Data from 26 patients in the Bmab group and 19 in the AFL group were analyzed. Median OS was slightly longer in the AFL group compared to the Bmab group, whereas median TTF was similar. ORR tended to be higher in the AFL group. The incidence of ≥grade 2 diarrhea and proteinuria was significantly higher in the AFL group than the Bmab group., Conclusion: In patients given combination treatment with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mCRC, AFL can increase response rates compared to Bmab, which may contribute to longer survival., (Copyright© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Nivolumab is effective against advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to or in patients intolerant of standard chemotherapy. This study was designed to clarify the impact of cancer cachexia in patients with AGC who received nivolumab., Patients and Methods: We recruited AGC patients who were treated with nivolumab from October 2017 to December 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer cachexia at the start of nivolumab. Cancer cachexia was defined as weight loss >5%; weight loss >2% and body mass index (BMI) <20; or sarcopenia and BMI <20. Primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and median time to treatment failure (TTF), while secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events., Results: The study enrolled 44 patients. Median OS and TTF were significantly shorter in patients with cancer cachexia than in those without cancer cachexia (OS: 6.6 vs. 2.3 months; HR=2.65; 95%CI=1.28-5.49; p=0.008, TTF: 2.6 vs. 1.9 months; HR=2.17; 95%CI=1.09-4.32, p=0.027). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, cancer cachexia was significantly associated with shorter OS. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. Nivolumab was associated with better OS and TTF outcomes in AGC patients without cachexia than in those with cachexia, albeit there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events., Conclusion: Cancer cachexia may be associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab., (Copyright © 2020 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The effect of renal dysfunction on the toxicity and efficacy of oxaliplatin remains unclear. We investigated the association between creatinine clearance (Ccr), a marker of renal function, and the toxicity and efficacy of oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with mCRC who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment were included in this study. Primary outcome was peripheral neuropathy (Grade ≥2), while secondary outcomes included neutropenia (Grade ≥3), thrombocytopenia (Grade ≥2) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 145 patients with mCRC were eligible. Incidence rates of peripheral neuropathy (Grade ≥2), neutropenia (Grade ≥3) and thrombocytopenia (Grade ≥2) were 30.3%, 37.2% and 16.6%, respectively, and median OS was 29.1 months. Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that there was no significant relationship between Ccr and any adverse event, or between Ccr and OS., Conclusion: Dose reduction of oxaliplatin based on Ccr is not recommended in patients with mCRC., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: To clarify whether renal dysfunction affects the incidence of adverse events associated with oxaliplatin, the present study was designed to investigate the relationship between creatinine clearance (Ccr) and the incidence of oxaliplatin-related adverse events., Patients and Methods: A total of 287 CRC patients who received the first cycle of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were eligible. Adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, were graded, and the relationship between Ccr and the incidence of adverse events was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: A multivariable analysis indicated that the incidence of grade ≥2 nausea increased, while the incidence of other adverse events tended to be higher, as the Ccr decreased. Particularly, renal dysfunction (Ccr <60 ml/min) was a significant risk factor for grade ≥2 nausea (p=0.042)., Conclusion: Care should be taken to avoid adverse events associated with oxaliplatin in patients with renal dysfunction., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Dysgeusia is one of the adverse events frequently affecting patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Dysgeusia-induced anorexia could decrease patient's quality of life. The present study was designed to determine whether the zinc-containing compound polaprezinc improves chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia., Patients and Methods: The incidence of grade 2 dysgeusia was assessed in 634 patients receiving cancer chemotherapy in outpatient settings during January 2013 and June 2017. Polaprezinc was administered to patients showing grade 2 dysgeusia and the effect was compared with that in patients subjected to follow-up observation., Results: Grade 2 dysgeusia appeared in 80 patients (12.6%), in whom pancreatic cancer and treatment with fluoropyrimidines were significant risks for dysgeusia. Polaprezinc, when administered to patients with grade 2 dysgeusia, significantly shortened the duration of dysgeusia compared with that in the follow-up observation group. Subgroup analysis indicated that polaprezinc was less effective in patients with pancreatic cancer, those receiving gemcitabine, or those whose age was 65 year-old and over., Conclusion: Chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia occurred with high frequency in patients with pancreatic cancer or in those receiving fluoropyrimidines. Polaprezinc was highly effective in improving the symptom of dysgeusia, except for patients with pancreatic cancer, those receiving gemcitabine and the elderly., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Cisplatin is commonly used for esophageal and gastric cancer, but has a high emetic risk. Although the control of vomiting is favorable, nausea is still poorly controlled in patients receiving cisplatin-based regimens. The present study was designed to determine the risks for cisplatin-induced nausea. The effect of olanzapine, an antipsychotic drug, as an antiemetic for patients with risk of poor control of nausea was subsequently examined., Patients and Methods: The prevalence of antiemetic medication and the control of nausea and vomiting were retrospectively examined in patients with esophageal or gastric cancer receiving the first cycle of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Risks for nausea were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, in which threshold for age and cisplatin dose wer assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis., Results: A total of 186 patients received cisplatin-based regimens during January 2011 and December 2016. Guideline-consistent antiemetic medication was administered to all patients. Although the rate of no vomiting was high (93%), the rate of non-significant (grade 2 or more) nausea was insufficient (64%) during the overall period. Risk analysis showed that cisplatin dose of 50 mg/m 2 or more and female gender were significant risks for nausea. Addition of olanzapine, but not of prochlorperazine, to the standard antiemetic medication was effective in suppressing nausea in patients who experienced nausea in the first cycle., Conclusion: Being female and cisplatin doses at 50 mg/m 2 or more were demonstrated to increase risk for nausea. Addition of olanzapine to the standard medication was effective in preventing nausea in high-risk patients with esophageal and gastric cancer., (Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) is known to exhibit a high emetic risk among moderate-emetic risk anticancer drugs, and the dose of CBDCA varies in different therapies. In concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the weekly administration of CBDCA (area under the curve (AUC) 2 mg/ml/min) and paclitaxel (PTX: 40 mg/m 2 ) is frequently applied as standard therapy. However, the optimal antiemetic measures in the use of such low-dose CBDCA remain unclear. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the antiemetic effect of a single-dose of a first-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT 3 RA) and dexamethasone in the weekly CBDCA+PTX therapy in CCRT., Patients and Methods: The subjects were patients with NSCLC who were administered weekly CBDCA+PTX therapy in CCRT between January 2011 and December 2016 at our Department. As an antiemetic measure, a first-generation 5-HT 3 RA, azasetron (10 mg, orally) or granisetron (3 mg, intravenously), and dexamethasone (9.9 mg, intravenously) were administered on day 1. The patients were evaluated for the following efficacy end-points for the first cycle: Complete response (CR; defined as no vomiting or retching episodes with no rescue medication) in the acute phase (0-24 hours), delayed phase (>24-120 hours), and overall phase (0-120 hours). Other efficacy endpoints evaluated were no vomiting or retching, and no nausea in all phases., Results: The subjects we assessed in this study were 46 patients who were administered weekly CBDCA+PTX therapy in CCRT. For the overall, acute, and delayed phases, the complete response rates were 89.1%, 100%, and 89.1%, respectively. The rate of no nausea in the overall, acute, and delayed phases was 78.3%, 100%, and 78.3%, respectively. The rate of no vomiting in the overall, acute, and delayed phases was 95.7%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively., Conclusion: A single dose of a first-generation 5-HT 3 RA and dexamethasone had a favorable suppressive effect on nausea and vomiting in weekly CBDCA+PTX therapy for NSCLC., (Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemotherapy with moderate emetic risk (MEC), including irinotecan-based and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens, are predominantly used for colorectal cancer chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain unsatisfactorily controlled., Patients and Methods: The rates of prevalence of antiemetic medication and the control of CINV were investigated from medical records in patients with colorectal cancer who received the first cycle of irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based regimens. Risks for CINV were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis., Results: A total of 179 patients received the first cycle of MEC regimens and the number of overall cycles was 2,176 during the study period from January 2013 to December 2015. Guideline-consistent antiemetic medication was performed in most cases. The rate of no-CINV was nearly 90% during the overall period. Female sex and age under 50 years were significant risks for CINV. Comparison considering only the group aged 50 years or more indicated that the control of CINV was significantly worse in irinotecan-based regimens than in the oxaliplatin-based regimens., Conclusion: Female sex and age younger than 50 years were significant risks for CINV in patients receiving MEC for colorectal cancer. Moreover, the control of CINV was less sufficient for irinotecan-based than for oxaliplatin-based regimens., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Although the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab is effective in treating colorectal cancer, the occurrence of severe skin disorders often discontinues therapy. Herein, we investigated by a retrospective chart review the effect of prophylactic oral minocycline in combination with skin treatment using moisturizer on the incidence of skin disorders and tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received panitumumab., Patients and Methods: In a total of 55 patients, 38 patients were eligible, consisting the pre-emptive group (N=25) and reactive group (N=13). Acneiform rash and other adverse events were graded according to the CTCAE v4.0., Results: The occurrence of acneiform rash (grade ≥2) was significantly lower in pre-emptive group than in reactive group (44.0% vs. 84.6%, p=0.04). No significant differences in the occurrence of other adverse events were observed between the two groups. Tumor response was not significantly different between the two groups (36.0% vs. 7.7%, OR, 6.75; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.75-60.76, p=0.12). Mean time to treatment failure was 149.7 days and 110.2 days in the pre-emptive group and reactive treatment group, respectively (HR=0.58; 95% CI= 0.26-1.28, p=0.18)., Conclusion: Prophylactic oral minocycline combined with skin care reduced panitumumab-induced acneiform rash without a significant influence on tumor response., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) according to the clinical practice guidelines is particularly important. In the present study, we investigated the adherence to the guidelines for antiemetic medication and the control of CINV in 61 patients with colorectal cancer receiving the first course of chemotherapy of moderate emetic risk at our outpatient cancer chemotherapy clinic. Furthermore, we carried out intervention to improve evidence-based antiemetic medication in another 64 patients. The rate of adherence to the antiemetic guidelines was only 6.6%; non-adherence was due mostly to the lack of dexamethasone treatment on days 2 and 3. In the interventional group, antiemetic medication adherence was markedly enhanced to 89%, which led to a significant enhancement of complete protection from nausea and vomiting during-delayed period (days 2-5 after chemotherapy) from 54% to 74% (p<0.05), although the daily dose of dexamethasone was 4 mg, lower than that recommended by the guidelines (8 mg). Finally, we evaluated the effect of dexamethasone at a daily dose of 4 mg, since little is known about the efficacy of such dose. Dexamethasone at this dose was found to be effective at elevating the rate of complete protection from nausea and vomiting during-delayed period (increase of 20%, p<0.05). These findings suggest that medication intervention to reduce the gap between guidelines and clinical practice improves the emetic control in patients with colorectal cancer receiving moderately-emetic chemotherapy.

Background: The acute antiemetic effect was compared between oral azasetron and intravenous granisetron based on the 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) (5-HT(3)) receptor occupancy theory., Patients and Methods: Receptor occupancy was estimated from reported data on plasma concentrations and affinity constants to 5-HT(3) receptor. A randomized non-inferiority study comparing acute antiemetic effects between oral azasetron and intravenous granisetron was performed in 105 patients receiving the first course of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for lung cancer., Results: Azasetron exhibited the highest 5-HT(3) receptor occupancy among various first-generation 5-HT(3) antagonists. The complete response to oral azasetron was shown to be non-inferior to that of intravenous granisetron, in which the risk difference was 0.0004 (95% confidence interval: -0.0519-0.0527). The lower limit of the confidence intervals did not exceed the negative non-inferiority margin (-0.1). The complete response during the overall period was not different (68% versus 67%)., Conclusion: Oral azasetron was found to be non-inferior to intravenous granisetron in the acute antiemetic effect against moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Background: The significance of repeated treatment with the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced emesis remains to be clarified., Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to compare the effects of single and repeated treatment with granisetron on anorexia, nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer who undertook anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based cancer chemotherapy., Results: The control of anorexia was significantly better in the single treatment group than in the repeated treatment group (54% versus 73%; odds ratio (OR), 0.433; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.226-0.828; p=0.016), although the rate of complete response to any signs of the gastrointestinal side-effects was not different between the two groups (37% versus 39%; OR, 0.911; CI, 0.489-1.700; p=0.874). However, the incidence of constipation was more frequent in the repeated treatment group (60% versus 37%; OR, 2.586; CI, 1.388-4.818; p=0.003)., Conclusion: Repeated treatment with 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist is not likely to be beneficial to breast cancer patients who undertook anthracycline/cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy.