1. Comparison of Two Radiotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Subgroup Analyses from a Randomized Trial.
- Author
-
Rades D, Conde-Moreno AJ, Cacicedo J, Šegedin B, Stanic K, Metz M, Rudat V, and Schild SE
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms pathology, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Compression etiology, Spinal Neoplasms secondary, Survival Rate, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Neoplasms radiotherapy, Spinal Cord Compression radiotherapy, Spinal Neoplasms radiotherapy
- Abstract
Background/aim: According to our randomized trial, 5×4Gy was comparable to 10×3Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression. Since it remained unclear whether findings applied to poor and intermediate prognoses patients, subgroup analyses were performed., Patients and Methods: In patients with poor prognoses, 58 received 5×4Gy, 53 received 10×3Gy. In intermediate-prognoses patients, numbers were 43 and 49., Results: In patients with poor prognoses, 1-month overall response (OR) was 85% after 5×4Gy and 10×3Gy (p=0.99), improvement 38% vs. 42%, ambulatory status 60% vs. 64% (p=0.83), 6-month local progression-free survival (LPFS) 75% vs. 69% (p=0.74) and 6-month overall survival (OS) 26% vs. 19% (p=0.43). In patients with intermediate prognoses, 1-month OR was 89% after 5×4Gy and 93% after 10×3Gy (p=0.85), improvement 39% vs. 45%, ambulatory status 84% vs. 82% (p=0.90), 6-month LPFS 79% vs. 92% (p=0.17) and 6-months OS 65% vs. 58% (p=0.65)., Conclusion: 5×4Gy was not significantly inferior to 10x3Gy in both subgroups., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF