Search

Background: The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a clinical test to diagnose peripheral artery disease. The Wyatt's score has been proposed to assess the students' performance on ABI measurement on a healthy volunteer (HV). No study has shown that this score is sensitive to different teaching methods. In this randomized controlled trial, we wanted to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improves proficiency in the ABI procedure assessed by the Wyatt's score., Methods: Medical students (n = 30) received a didactic learning, including (1) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (2) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into 2 groups ("the no experiential learning group" and "the experiential learning group"). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and then the final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he performed a correct ABI procedure on an HV. The correct procedure corresponds to the following: (1) correctly answered Wyatt's score and (2) a difference in the ABI measurement between a professor in vascular medicine and a student was ≤0.15., Results: No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students for the Wyatt's score depending on their learning group [didactic alone (1/10) or didactic + experiential training (15/20)] and also for the ABI procedure [didactic alone (0/10) or didactic + experiential training (16/20)]. At 6 months, among the 12 students who passed the final evaluation, 4 students passed both the Wyatt's score and the ABI measurement., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the Wyatt's score was sensitive to an educational intervention and no improvement was found in the case of "no experiential learning." The Wyatt's score could be used to evaluate the student on ABI measurement after an educational intervention., Trial Registration: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Vascular Medicine Department of Rennes University Hospital (France). This was approved by the ethics review board of our institution (no. 16.150)., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest, postexercise ABI, and toe-brachial index (TBI) are essential diagnostic tools recommended for peripheral artery disease (PAD) diagnosis. Our study investigates the level of knowledge on these 3 tests among vascular medicine residents from 4 French medical schools in France., Methods: We included 19 vascular medicine residents in a cross-sectional study. During an annual obligatory seminar, all residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires concerning knowledge about these 3 tests., Results: All residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires. None of the residents correctly knows how to perform all pressure measurements (ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI). Two residents had the knowledge to perform the whole ABI at rest procedure, whereas no resident had the knowledge to perform neither the postexercise ABI (P = 0.48) nor the TBI (P = 0.48). Twelve residents correctly completed the question regarding the interpretation of ABI at rest, whereas 2 correctly completed the postexercise ABI question (P = 0.001) and 4 the TBI question (P = 0.02). The number of residents who have performed more than 20 measurements is higher regarding ABI at rest than postexercise ABI and TBI (84%, 5%, and 37% respectively; P < 0.001 and P = 0.006 respectively) and significantly less often in postexercise ABI than TBI (5% vs. 37%; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that residents' knowledge of pressure measurements (resting-ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI) of 4 French medical school are insufficient although the importance of pressure measurement has been strongly highlighted by the newly released PAD guidelines (2016) for PAD diagnosis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of imaging is increasing in clinical practice either for diagnosis or intervention. In these aims, contrast medium (CM) is widely used. However, CM administration can induce contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The incidence of CIN varies from 2% to 50% depending on patient risk factors, and CIN is the third cause of renal insufficiency. To date, methods such as hyperhydration to prevent CIN have a low level of evidence. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), which has already proved its efficiency in the cardiology field, seems to be a promising technique for CIN prevention. The aim of this work was to carry out a systematic review of the literature of the randomized clinical studies on RIPC in the prevention of CIN in man., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical studies on the RIPC in the prevention of CIN in man. Documentary sources were PubMed articles published until June 2015. Randomized clinical trials of RIPC in preventing CIN in human were reviewed., Results: Five articles were selected for the analysis. One article studied the impact of RIPC in a population at high risk of CIN, whereas the other 4 analyzed populations at low, moderate or unknown risk of CIN. In 4 studies, except the later one, the risk of CIN was based on the Mehran score that was previously published. In the high-risk population, a decrease in the incidence of CIN was found in the RIPC group compared with the control group (12% against 40%; P = 0.002). Among the 3 other studies using the Mehran's score, one also demonstrated the interest of such a procedure in a subgroup of high-risk patients. A second one found a low incidence of CIN in the RIPC group ([5 of 47; 10%] as compared with a control group [17 of 47; 36%] P = 0.003) in patients at the low risk of CIN. In another low-risk population, a significant lower level of a biological marker (liver-type fatty acid-binding protein) that assesses a renal impairment was found in the RIPC compared with the control group., Conclusions: Only 5 studies were found in this search, which may constitute a limitation. However, RIPC appears as a promising method to prevent CIN since it is a noninvasive, low cost, easy, and safe method. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these preliminary results., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)