Search

Background: Patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) have a time-sensitive need for a functional permanent access due to high risk of catheter-associated morbidity. Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (BCF) have been reported to have higher maturation and patency compared to radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RCF), although more distal creation is encouraged when possible. However, this may lead to a delay in establishing permanent vascular access and, ultimately, TDC removal. Our goal was to assess short-term outcomes after BCF and RCF creation for patients with concurrent TDCs to see if these patients would potentially benefit more from an initial brachiocephalic access to minimize TDC dependence., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative hemodialysis registry was analyzed from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, access type, and short-term outcomes including occlusion, reinterventions, and access being used for dialysis, were assessed., Results: There were 2,359 patients with TDC, of whom 1,389 (58.9%) underwent BCF creation and 970 (41.1%) underwent RCF creation. Average patient age was 59 years, and 62.8% were male. Compared with RCF, those with BCF were more often older, of female sex, obese, nonindependently ambulatory, have commercial insurance, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, be on anticoagulation, and have a cephalic vein diameter of ≥3 mm (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis for 1-year outcomes for BCF and RCF, respectively, showed that primary patency was 45% vs. 41.3% (P = 0.88), primary assisted patency was 86.7% vs. 86.9% (P = 0.64), freedom from reintervention was 51.1% vs. 46.3% (P = 0.44), and survival was 81.3% vs. 84.9% (P = 0.02). Multivariable analysis showed that BCF was comparable to RCF with respect to primary patency loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.36, P = 0.316), primary assisted patency loss (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.29, P = 0.66), and reintervention (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.27, P = 0.92). Access being used at 3 months was similar but trending towards RCF being used more often (odds ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.49-1, P = 0.05)., Conclusions: BCFs do not have superior fistula maturation and patency compared to RCFs in patients with concurrent TDCs. Creation of radial access, when possible, does not prolong TDC dependence., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a quality measure and early death may represent a technical complication or poor patient selection. Our objective was to analyze patients who died in the hospital within postoperative day (POD) 0-2 after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2003-2019 for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. Operations were categorized as in-hospital death on POD 0-2 (POD 0-2 Death), in-hospital death beyond POD 2 (POD ≥3 Death), and those alive at discharge. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed., Results: There were 7,592 elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs with 61 (0.8%) POD 0-2 Death, 156 (2.1%) POD ≥3 Death, and 7,375 (97.1%) alive at discharge. Overall, median age was 70 years and 73.6% were male. Iliac aneurysm repair and surgical approach (anterior/retroperitoneal) were similar among groups. POD 0-2 Death, compared to POD ≥3 Death and those alive at discharge, had the longest renal/visceral ischemia time, more commonly had proximal clamp placement above both renal arteries, an aortic distal anastomosis, longest operative time, and largest estimated blood loss (all P < 0.05). Postoperative vasopressor usage, myocardial infarction, stroke, and return to the operating room were most frequent in POD 0-2 Death and extubation in the operating room was least frequent (all P < 0.001). Postoperative bowel ischemia and renal failure occurred most commonly among POD ≥3 Death (all P < 0.001).On multivariable analysis, POD 0-2 Death was associated with congestive heart failure, prior peripheral vascular intervention, female sex, preoperative aspirin use, lower center volume quartile, renal/visceral ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and older age (all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: POD 0-2 Death was associated with comorbidities, center volume, renal/visceral ischemia time, and estimated blood loss. Referral to high-volume aortic centers could improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) with renal dysfunction are at an increased risk for perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality. Our goal was to examine perioperative and 3-year outcomes after lower extremity bypass for CLTI stratified by kidney function., Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis of lower extremity bypass for CLTI was performed between 2008 and 2019. Kidney function was categorized as normal (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable analysis were performed., Results: There were 221 infrainguinal bypasses performed for CLTI. Patients were classified by renal function as normal (59.7%), CKD (24.4%), and ESRD (15.8%). Average age was 66 years and 65% were male. Overall, 77% had tissue loss with 9%, 45%, 24%, and 22% being Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection stages 1-4, respectively. The majority (58%) of bypass targets was infrapopliteal and 58% used ipsilateral greater saphenous vein. The 90-day mortality and readmission rates were 2.7% and 49.8%, respectively. ESRD, compared to CKD and normal renal function, respectively, had the highest 90-day mortality (11.4% vs. 1.9% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.002) and 90-day readmission (69% vs. 55% vs. 43%, P = 0.017). On multivariable analysis, ESRD, but not CKD, was associated with higher 90-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 16.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-156.6, P = 0.013) and 90-day readmission (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.2-7.58, P = 0.019). Kaplan-Meier 3-year analysis showed no difference between groups for primary patency or major amputation; however, ESRD, compared to CKD and normal renal function, respectively, had worse primary-assisted patency (60% vs. 76% vs. 84%, P = 0.03) and survival (72% vs. 96% vs. 94%, P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, ESRD and CKD were not associated with 3-year primary patency loss/death, but ESRD was associated with higher primary-assisted patency loss (hazard ratio (HR) 2.61, 95% CI 1.23-5.53, P = 0.012). ESRD and CKD were not associated with 3-year major amputation/death. ESRD was associated with higher 3-year mortality (HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.52-16.2, P = 0.008) while CKD was not., Conclusions: ESRD, but not CKD, was associated with higher perioperative and long-term mortality after lower extremity bypass for CLTI. Although ESRD was associated with lower long-term primary-assisted patency, there were no differences in loss of primary patency or major amputation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for lower extremity peripheral artery disease have been increasing, particularly in the office-based setting. Our goal was to evaluate practice patterns for PVI by site of service using a contemporary real-world dataset., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was queried from 2010-2021. Site of service was classified as hospital/inpatient, hospital/outpatient, and ambulatory/office-based center. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and periprocedural outcomes were analyzed., Results: There were 54,897 hospital/inpatient (43.2%), 64,105 hospital/outpatient (50.4%), and 8,179 ambulatory/office-based center (6.4%) PVI. When comparing the 2 outpatient settings, ambulatory/office-based center patients were older than hospital/outpatient (mean age 70.7 vs. 68.7 years), more often female sex (41.4% vs. 39.1%), never smokers (27.5% vs. 18.5%), primary Medicare (61.6% vs. 55.9%), nonambulatory (6.5% vs. 4.7%), less often with coronary artery disease (30.2% vs. 34.1%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (18.1% vs. 26.9%), congestive heart failure (13% vs. 17.2%), obesity (30.9% vs. 33.6%), and less often on a statin (71.4% vs. 76.1%) (P < 0.001). Ambulatory/office-based center procedures were more likely for claudication (60.1% vs. 55.8%), more often involved femoro-popliteal (73.1% vs. 64.6%) and infrapopliteal (36.7% vs. 24.3%), and less often iliac interventions (24.1% vs. 33.6%) (P < 0.001).Overall, atherectomy was used in 14.2% of hospital/inpatient, 19.4% of hospital/outpatient, and 63.4% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. Stents were used in 41.8% of hospital/inpatient, 45.1% of hospital/outpatient, and 48.8% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. However, stent grafts were used in 12.5% of hospital/inpatient, 8.8% of hospital/outpatient, and only 1.3% of ambulatory/office-based center procedures. On multivariable analysis, compared with hospital/inpatient, atherectomy use was associated with ambulatory/office-based center setting (Odds ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 10.3-11.5, P < 0.001) and hospital/outpatient setting (Odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.51-1.62, P < 0.001). Periprocedure complications including hematoma requiring intervention (0.3%), any stenosis/occlusion (0.2%), and distal embolization (0.6%) were quite low across all settings., Conclusions: There are substantial variations in patient populations, procedural indications, and types of interventions undertaken during PVI across different locations. Ambulatory/office-based procedures more commonly treat claudicants, use atherectomy, and less often use stent grafts. Further research is warranted to investigate long-term trends in practice patterns and long-term outcomes, for PVI in the ever-expanding ambulatory/office-based setting., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Shunting during eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) may be technically challenging. Whether shunting practice patterns modify perioperative stroke risk after eCEA is unclear. We aimed to compare eCEA outcomes based on shunting practice., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2019) was queried for eCEAs performed for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared outcomes based on whether shunting was routine practice, preoperatively-indicated, intraoperatively-indicated, or not performed., Results: There were 13,207 eCEAs identified. Average age was 71.4 years and 59.4% of patients were male sex. Ipsilateral carotid stenosis was >80% in 45.6% and there was severe contralateral carotid stenosis in 8.6%. Early ipsilateral symptoms within 14 days of eCEA were transient ischemic attack in 5.6% and stroke in 7%. The majority of cases were performed under general anesthesia (82.7%). Electroencephalogram monitoring and stump pressures were utilized in 30.9% and 14.7%, respectively. Shunting was routine (25.4%), preoperatively-indicated (1.9%), intraoperatively-indicated (4.7%), or not implemented (68%). Preoperatively-indicated shunting was more often performed in patients with early symptomatic carotid stenosis or severe contralateral carotid stenosis. After routine shunting, preoperatively-indicated shunting, intraoperatively-indicated shunting, and no shunting, median operative duration was 110, 101, 112, and 97 min, respectively (P < 0.001), and ipsilateral perioperative stroke prevalence was 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.9%, and 0.7%, respectively (P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, longer operative time was associated with routine shunting (MR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.19, P < 0.001), preoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001), and intraoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16, P < 0.001) compared with no shunting. Compared with no shunting, routine shunting (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54-1.54, P = 0.74) and preoperatively-indicated shunting (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.47-4.99, P = 0.48) were not associated with stroke; however, intraoperatively-indicated shunting was associated with increased stroke (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.41-5.3, P = 0.003). Shunting type was not associated with perioperative mortality., Conclusions: Intraoperatively-indicated shunting during eCEA was associated with longest operative duration and increased perioperative stroke risk. Surgeon familiarity with shunting and planning to shunt in advance may permit more expeditious shunting and prevent stroke., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intermittent claudication (IC) is a commonly treated vascular condition. Patient sex has been shown to influence outcomes of interventions for other vascular disorders; however, whether outcomes of interventions for IC vary by sex is unclear. We sought to assess the association of patient sex with outcomes after IC interventions., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2010-2020 for all peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI), infra-inguinal bypasses (IIB), and supra-inguinal bypasses (SIB) for any degree IC. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared peri-operative and long-term outcomes by patient sex., Results: There were 24,701 female and 40,051 male patients undergoing PVI, 2,789 female and 6,525 male patients undergoing IIB, and 1,695 female and 2,370 male patients undergoing SIB for IC. Guideline-recommended pre-operative medical therapy differed with female patients less often prescribed aspirin for PVI (73.4% vs. 77.3%), IIB (71.5% vs. 74.8%), and SIB (70.9% vs. 74.3%) or statins for PVI (71.8% vs. 76.7%) and IIB (73.1% vs. 76.0%) (all P < 0.05). Female compared with male patients had lower 1-year reintervention-free survival after PVI (84.4% ± 0.3% vs. 86.3% ± 0.2%, P < 0.001), IIB (79.0% ± 0.9% vs. 81.2% ± 0.6%, P = 0.04), and SIB (89.4% ± 0.9% vs. 92.6% ± 0.7%, P = 0.005), but similar amputation-free survival and survival across all procedures. Multivariable analysis confirmed that female sex was associated with increased 1-year reintervention for PVI (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.24, P < 0.001), IIB, (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, P = 0.02), and SIB (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20-2.13, P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Female patients undergoing interventions for IC were less often pre-operatively medically optimized than male patients, though the difference was small. Furthermore, female sex was associated with more reinterventions after interventions. Interventionists treating female patients should increase their efforts to maximize medical therapy. Future research should clarify reasons for poorer intervention durability in female patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients who are obese or underweight are traditionally at higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. The effect of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is unclear. Our goal was to analyze the association of BMI with perioperative and long-term outcomes after elective CEA., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was queried from 2003-2018 for patients undergoing elective CEAs. Patients were categorized into 5 BMI cohorts - underweight (UW, BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (NW, BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (OW, BMI 25-29.9 kg/m 2 ), obese (OB, BMI 30-39.9 kg/m 2 ), and morbidly obese (MO, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ). Perioperative and long-term outcomes were assessed with univariable and multivariable analyses., Results: There were 89,079 patients included: 2% UW, 26% NW, 38.4% OW, 29.9% OB, and 3.6% MO. Overall, the mean age was 70.6 years, 60% were male, and 91.8% were of white race. There were significant differences among the BMI cohorts in regards to age, sex, smoking status, and comorbidities (all P < 0.05). For perioperative outcomes, the BMI cohorts differed significantly in reoperation for bleeding and 30-day mortality. On multivariable analysis, BMI was not associated with stroke or perioperative mortality. MO was associated with perioperative cardiac complications (Odds Ratios [OR] 1.26, 95% CI 1-1.57, P = 0.05). UW status was associated with increased return to the operating room (OR 1.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.28-2.78, P = 0.001), 30-day mortality (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1-2.86, P =0.05), 1-year mortality (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.74, P = 0.01), and 5-year mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.41, P =0.005)., Conclusions: BMI status was not associated with perioperative stroke, cranial nerve injury, or surgical site infections. Patients with MO had higher perioperative cardiac complications. UW patients have lower short and long-term survival and should be a focus for long-term targeted risk factor stratification and modification., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The day of the week (DOW) for performing procedures and operations has been shown to affect clinical and resource utilization outcomes. Limited published data are available on vascular surgery operations. Our primary objective was to assess outcomes by DOW for infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB) performed for claudication or rest pain. The secondary objective was to assess outcomes by DOW for LEBs performed for tissue loss., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2003 to 2018 for all elective index infrainguinal LEBs performed for claudication or rest pain. Cases performed for acute limb ischemia as well as concomitant peripheral vascular intervention, nonelective LEBs, sequential grafts, and weekend cases were excluded. LEBs were grouped by DOW: Monday-Tuesday (early weekdays) versus Wednesday-Friday (later weekdays). Baseline data, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. LEBs performed for claudication/rest pain were analyzed together while tissue loss was assessed separately., Results: There were 12,084 LEBs identified-44.5% performed on Monday-Tuesday and 55.5% on Wednesday-Friday. Overall, the mean age was 65.6 years, 68.6% were male, and 82.8% were Caucasian. LEBs were performed for claudication in 57.4% of cases. An autogenous great saphenous vein was used in 58.8% of cases, whereas a prosthetic graft was used in 35.1% of cases. The most common bypass origin was the femoral artery (94.1%), and target was the popliteal artery (70.1%). Significant differences between Monday-Tuesday versus Wednesday-Friday, respectively, were mean body mass index (27.8 kg/m 2 vs. 28 kg/m 2 ), preoperative aspirin use (74.2% vs. 72.5%), continuous vein harvest technique (41.9% vs. 44%), and mean operative time (mins) (216.2 vs. 222.6) (all P < 0.05). Univariate postoperative outcomes were significantly different between Monday-Tuesday versus Wednesday-Friday, respectively, for mean length of stay (LOS) (days) (3.9 vs. 4.3), cardiac complications (myocardial infarction/dysrhythmia/congestive heart failure) (3.5% vs. 4.9%), stroke (0.3% vs. 0.6%), and respiratory complications (0.8% vs. 1.3%) (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LEBs performed on Wednesday-Friday versus Monday-Tuesday for claudication/rest pain were independently associated with cardiac complications and prolonged LOS. There were also 8,491 LEBs performed for tissue loss which overall had similar findings to LEBs performed for claudication/rest pain such as increased LOS for LEBs performed for tissue loss on Wednesday-Friday (P < 0.001) and similar likeliness for respiratory complication, wound complication, return to the operating room, and mortality (all P > 0.05). However, LEBs performed for tissue loss on Wednesday-Friday versus Monday-Tuesday had similar cardiac complications (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Elective LEBs performed on later weekdays for claudication/rest pain were associated with cardiac complications and prolonged LOS, whereas tissue loss confirmed association with prolonged LOS. Further investigations are needed to identify whether increased resources or allocation of resources should be focused on later weekdays to optimize patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited data on access type when treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Our study's objective was to evaluate if the type of access in ruptured AAAs affected outcomes., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2009 to 2018 for all ruptured AAAs treated with an index EVAR. Procedures were grouped by access type: percutaneous, open, and failed percutaneous that converted to open access. Patients with iliac access, both percutaneous and open access, and concurrent bypass were excluded. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and outcomes were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed., Results: There were 1,206 ruptured AAAs identified-739 (61.3%) was performed by percutaneous access, 416 (34.5%) by open access, and 51 (4.2%) by failed percutaneous that converted to open access. Percutaneous access, compared with open access and failed percutaneous access, respectively, had the shortest operative time (min, median) (111 vs. 138 vs. 180, P < 0.001) and was most often performed under local anesthesia (16.7% vs. 5% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001). The amount of contrast used was similar between the approaches. Univariable analysis comparing percutaneous access, open access, and failed percutaneous access showed differences in 30-day mortality (19.9% vs. 24.8% vs. 39.2%, P = 0.002), postoperative complications (33.7% vs. 40.2% vs. 54%, P = 0.003), and cardiac complications (18.2% vs. 19.8% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.018). However, multivariable analysis did not show access type to have a significant effect on cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, any complications, return to the operating room, or perioperative mortality. Open access was independently associated with a prolonged length of stay (means ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.33, P = 0.012). Factors independently associated with failed percutaneous were prior bypass (odds ratio (OR) 9.77, 95% CI 2.44-39.16, P = 0.001) and altered mental status (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.17-5.15, P = 0.018)., Conclusions: Access type for ruptured AAAs was not independently associated with major morbidity or mortality but did have a differential effect on length of stay. Access during these emergent procedures should be based on surgeon preference and experience., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this study, we compared the outcomes of forearm arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and upper arm AVGs in a large, prospectively collected data set, which represents real-world experience with upper extremity prosthetic dialysis access, to determine if there are clinically significant differences in the upper arm and forearm positions., Methods: We identified 2,063 patients who received upper extremity AVGs within the Vascular Quality Initiative data set (2010-2018). Axillary to axillary upper arm AVGs were excluded (n = 394) from the analysis. The main outcome measures were primary and secondary patency rates at 12 months. Other outcomes were 6-month wound infection, steal syndrome, and arm swelling. The log-rank test was used to evaluate patency loss using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine adjusted association between locations (forearm and upper arm) and outcomes., Results: There were 1,160 forearm AVGs and 509 upper arm brachial artery AVGs in the study cohort. Patients with forearm AVGs were more likely to have a body mass index > 30 (45% vs. 38%, P = 0.013), no history of previous access (73% vs. 63%, P < 0.001), and underwent local-regional anesthesia (56% vs. 43%, P < 0.001). The 12-month primary patency (51.5% vs. 62.9%, P < 0.001) and secondary patency (76.4% vs. 89.1%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower for forearm AVGs. Wound infection, steal syndrome, and arm swelling were similar between forearm AVGs and upper arm AVGs at the 6-month follow-up. In multivariable analysis, the primary patency loss (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-2.01, P < 0.001) and 12-month secondary patency loss (aHR 2.71, 95% CI 1.84-3.98, P < 0.001) were significantly higher for forearm AVGs at 12 months., Conclusions: From this observational study of the Vascular Quality Initiative data set, the primary and secondary patency rates were superior for upper arm brachial artery AVGs compared with forearm AVGs., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (BCFs) are commonly placed in outpatient settings. The impact of general anesthesia (GA), regional anesthesia (RA), or local anesthesia (LA) on perioperative recovery and fistula maturation/patency after outpatient BCF creations is unknown. We evaluated whether outcomes of outpatient BCF creations vary based on anesthesia modality., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2018) national database was queried for outpatient BCF creations. Anesthesia modalities included GA, RA, and LA. Perioperative, 3-month, and 1-year outcomes were compared between GA versus RA/LA anesthesia types., Results: Among 3,527 outpatient BCF creations, anesthesia types were GA in 1,043 (29.6%), RA in 1,150 (32.6%), and LA in 1,334 (37.8%). Patients receiving GA were more often younger, obese, Medicaid recipients, without coronary artery disease, and treated in non-office-based settings (P < 0.05 for all). GA compared with RA/LA cohorts were more often admitted postoperatively (5.3% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001) but had similar rates of thirty-day mortality (0.9 vs. 0.6%, P = 0.39). 3-month access utilization for hemodialysis was lower in GA than in RA/LA cohorts (12.6% vs. 23.6%, P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that GA and RA/LA cohorts had similar 1-year primary access occlusion-free survival (43.6% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.24) and endovascular/open reintervention-free survival (57.2% vs. 57.6%, P = 0.98). On multivariable analysis, GA compared with RA/LA use was independently associated with increased postoperative admission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.67, P = 0.02) and decreased 3-month access utilization (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.25-0.61, P < 0.001) but had similar 1-year access occlusion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.9-1.32, P = 0.36) and reintervention (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.26, P = 0.88). On subgroup analysis of the RA/LA cohort, RA compared with LA was associated with increased 3-month access utilization (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.01-2.5; P = 0.04) and 1-year access reintervention (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.12-1.89), but had similar 1-year access occlusion (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.95-1.51, P = 0.13)., Conclusions: Compared with RA/LA use, GA use in patients undergoing outpatient BCF creations was associated with increased hospital admissions, decreased access utilization at 3 months, and similar 1-year access occlusion and reintervention. RA/LA is preferable to expedite recovery and access utilization., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infrainguinal peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) can be performed with a variety of sheath sizes. Our aim was to investigate the effect of sheath size on postprocedural complications after infrainguinal PVIs., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2017) was queried for patients undergoing infrainguinal PVIs via retrograde common femoral artery access. Univariable and multivariable methods were performed to compare the effects of sheath size on access site complications, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality., Results: Of the 36,901 infrainguinal PVI procedures in the data set, the mean age was 69 years, and 59.1% of patients were male. Indications for intervention were claudication (41.6%), rest pain (13.2%), and tissue loss (45.2%). The femoropopliteal and tibial arteries were treated in 84.7% and 35.4% of cases, respectively. Interventions included stenting (39.2%) and atherectomy (21.3%). Sheath sizes of 7F, 6F, 5F, and 4F were used in 5225 (14.1%), 24,541 (66.5%), 6221 (16.9%), and 914 (2.5%) cases, respectively. Differences among sheath sizes were observed based on the ambulatory status; presence of diabetes, end-stage renal disease, previously stented ipsilateral extremities, anemia, preprocedural anticoagulation; and procedural details including indications, location of intervention, and intervention type (P < 0.001 for all). On univariable analysis, sheath size (7F vs 6F vs 5F vs 4F) was associated with differences in access site hematoma (3.5% vs 2.7% vs 2.5% vs 1.2%, P < 0.001), postprocedural LOS > 1 day (18.1% vs 25.3% vs 31.1% vs 27.9%, P < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (0.9% vs 1.4% vs 1.5% vs 1.5%, P = 0.007). There was no difference in hematoma requiring intervention or access site stenosis/occlusion based on sheath size. Multivariable analysis revealed that a larger sheath size was independently associated with access site hematoma (7F: odds ratio [OR] = 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.28-7.89, P < 0.001; 6F: OR = 3.11, 95% CI = 1.69-5.7, P < 0.001; 5F: OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.46-5.05, P = 0.002) and postprocedural LOS > 1 day (7F: OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.39-2.05, P < 0.001; 6F: OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.26-1.78, P < 0.001; 5F: OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.26-1.8, P < 0.001). Access site hematoma requiring intervention and 30-day mortality were not independently associated with sheath size., Conclusions: In infrainguinal PVIs, larger sheaths increased the risk of minor access site hematomas, but not major morbidity or mortality. Larger sheaths were associated with longer postprocedural LOS, possibly because of conservative management of hematomas., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) utilize hospital resources at high rates. One major driver for resource utilization is emergency department (ED) visits. Our goal was to assess perioperative ED visits after lower extremity bypass (LEB) for CLI., Methods: All patients undergoing LEB for CLI from 2008 to 2017 at our institution were analyzed. ED visits and details of the visit within 30 and 90 days of discharge from index admission were recorded. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for any ED presentation and ED presentation without hospital admission., Results: There were 317 patients identified who underwent infrainguinal LEB for CLI. Average age was 66 years, and 60.6% of patients were male. Within 30 and 90 days, 24.3% and 36.3% presented to the ED overall, and 16.7% and 26.5% of all postoperative patients had an ED presentation without hospital admission, respectively. Most common reasons for any ED visits and for ED visits without admission within 30 days were wound complications (22.1% and 20.8%), cardiac complications (16.9% and 17%), and ipsilateral leg pain (10.4% and 11.3%), respectively. Cryopreserved vein bypass (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-8.84, P = 0.046) and index length of stay (LOS) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001) predicted any 30-day ED visit. Active leg infection at the time of bypass (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.21-4.58, P = 0.012) and index LOS (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.004-1.09, P = 0.033) predicted 30-day ED presentation without hospital admission. Most common reasons for any ED visit and for ED visits without admission within 90 days were surgical wound complications (15.8% and 14.3%), cardiac complications (14.9% and 14.3%), and nonsurgical wounds (9.6% and 9.5%), respectively. Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.52-4.93, P = 0.001) and index LOS (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, P = 0.017) predicted any 90-day ED visit. CRI (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.81-6.17, P = 0.001) predicted 90-day ED presentation without hospital admission. For multiple ED visits within 90 days, there were 5 patients each with 5 ED visits, 12 each with 4 ED visits, 26 each with 3 ED visits, and 47 each with 2 ED visits., Conclusions: There is a high rate of ED utilization in CLI patients after LEB. Targeting these patients with closer follow-up and improved outpatient ambulatory access could assist in decreasing the frequency of postoperative ED visits. Particular areas of targeted improvement are those patients who presented to the ED and were not admitted., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Length of stay (LOS) is commonly used to gauge hospital resource utilization and can affect hospital profit margin. Other fields of surgery have showed that operations performed close to the weekend have longer LOS and higher patient morbidity. Our goal was to investigate whether asymptomatic patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) earlier in the week had a shorter LOS and improved clinical outcomes compared to those treated before the weekend., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for elective weekday CEAs performed for asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 2005 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed to compare outcomes based on the day of the week., Results: There were 26,882 asymptomatic CEAs performed on Monday (20.3%), Tuesday (23.0%), Wednesday (21.3%), Thursday (18.8%), and Friday (16.6%). The mean patient age was 70.5 years, and 59.2% were male. Thirty-day mortality (0.4%) and perioperative complications including stroke (1.4%), myocardial infarction (0.7%), and return to the operating room (1.5%) were not significantly different across weekdays. Patients were discharged on statins in 84.2% of cases and aspirin in 91.5% of cases. The mean LOS ranged from 1.6 ± 2.2 days to 1.8 ± 3.2 days. CEAs performed on Fridays had a longer LOS (1.8 ± 2.4; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CEAs performed on Friday had longer LOS compared to those performed on Monday through Thursday (means ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.07; P < 0.001). However, there were no differences in perioperative complications to attribute this to. Friday CEA did not have an effect on discharge medication compliance with aspirin (odds ratio: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07; P = 0.339) or statin medications (odds ratio: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.79-1.03; P = 0.126)., Conclusion: Asymptomatic CEA performed before the weekend was associated with longer LOS although there were no differences in perioperative mortality, morbidity, and discharge medication compliance. Such LOS increase, albeit small, may affect the hospital profit margin for the procedure and performing an elective CEA on asymptomatic patients earlier in the week may benefit in a shorter LOS. Improved team staffing and resources on weekends are potential areas for improvement for earlier discharge; however, further investigation is needed., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of statin and antiplatelet medications has been advocated in patients with cerebrovascular disease as primary medical therapy and as an adjunct to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Our goal was to assess the prevalence of preoperative statin and antiplatelet use and its effect on perioperative outcomes after CEA., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted CEA database was queried for patients undergoing CEA between 2011 and 2014. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the effect of preoperative statin and antiplatelet use on CEA., Results: There were 13,521 CEAs identified. The average age was 71 years, and 61.5% were male. More than half of patients (57.9%) were asymptomatic. Preoperative statin use was seen in 80.5% of patients, and antiplatelet use was seen in 89.3% of patients. Statin use was more common in patients with higher body mass index, independent functional status, diabetes, hypertension, bleeding disorders or anticoagulation, nonsmokers, and asymptomatic patients (P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, statin use was not associated with postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) (1.9% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.085), stroke (1.8% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.55), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (0.9% vs. 1.1%), or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (4% vs. 3.6%). On multivariate analysis, preoperative statin use did not independently affect 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.6, P = 0.825), perioperative MI (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.77-1.58, P = 0.573), stroke (OR: 0.891, 95% CI: 0.64-1.2, P = 0.42), or MACE (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81-1.32, P = 0.806). Antiplatelet use was more common with male gender, nonsmoking, diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea, and asymptomatic carotid disease. On univariate analysis, antiplatelet use showed no effect on 30-day mortality (0.7% vs. 1%, P = 0.28), MI (1.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.73), stroke (1.8% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.94), TIA (0.9% vs. 1%, P = 0.63), or MACE (3.9% vs. 4%, P = 0.8). On multivariate analysis, preoperative antiplatelet use did not independently affect 30-day mortality (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.3, P = 0.19), perioperative MI (OR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.59-1.38, P = 0.637), stroke (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.61-1.4, P = 0.69), or MACE (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.66-1.18, P = 0.39)., Conclusions: Preoperative statin and antiplatelet use in patients undergoing CEA was more often observed in patients with higher rates of comorbidities and asymptomatic disease, and this may represent closer follow-up and engagement with primary care physicians in this patient cohort. Preoperative statin and antiplatelet use did not affect perioperative outcomes suggesting that its short-term use is not essential. In patients who are not on statins or antiplatelet medications, CEA can safely be performed before consideration is given to their initiation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are at risk of perioperative infections that can lead to subsequent complications. Our goal was to understand how an initial infectious complication influences the risk of subsequent complications in this cohort of patients., Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2005-2012), we evaluated the relationship between 3 index infectious complications after open elective AAA repair (pneumonia, deep/organ surgical site infection [SSI], and urinary tract infection [UTI]) and subsequent complications. We used 5:1 propensity matching and calculated propensity score to experience to establish matching cohorts for each index complication. This score was based on preoperative variables and number of event-free days., Results: There were 3,991 patients who were identified to have undergone elective open AAA repair in the ACS-NSQIP database. Postoperative index pneumonia was associated with increased risk of unplanned intubation (28.6% vs. 3.5%; odds ratio [OR], 10.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-17.5; P < 0.001), prolonged ventilation (38.5% vs. 6.7%; OR, 8.7; 95% CI: 5.9-13.0; P < 0.001), sepsis (14.3% vs. 3.3%; OR, 4.8; 95% CI: 2.8-8.4; P < 0.001), acute renal failure (9.9% vs. 2.1%; OR, 5.1; 95% CI: 2.6-9.9; P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (3.8% vs. 1.4%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI: 1.1-7.0; P = 0.035), and mortality (7.1% vs. 3.0%; OR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3-4.9; P = 0.009). Postoperative index UTI was associated with increased risk of sepsis (21.4% vs. 0%; OR, 49.2; 95% CI: 14.5-166.8; P < 0.001), pneumonia (10.7% vs. 2.9%; OR, 4.0; 95% CI: 1.8-8.6; P = 0.001), DVT (3.6% vs. 0.4%; OR, 10.0; 95% CI: 1.8-55.5; P = 0.008), and mortality (5.4% vs. 1.8%; OR, 3.0; 95% CI: 1.1-8.5; P = 0.02). Finally, postoperative index deep/organ SSI increased the risk of pneumonia (13.0% vs. 0.9%; OR, 16.7; 95% CI: 1.6-168.2; P = 0.017), prolonged ventilation (21.7% vs. 0.9%; OR, 30.8; 95% CI: 3.4-279.4; P = 0.002), and sepsis (13.0% vs. 0.9%; OR, 16.7; 95% CI: 1.6-168.2; P = 0.017)., Conclusions: A postoperative nosocomial infection after open AAA repair is significantly more likely to lead to serious subsequent complications. Prevention and early identification of infectious index complications and subsequent complications could allow for interventions that could decrease morbidity and mortality., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: One of the main advantages of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) compared to open repair. However, patients with preexisting conditions may be predisposed to a protracted LOS. Our aim was to identify preoperative risk factors for prolonged postoperative LOS after elective EVAR., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2013) was used to analyze all patients undergoing elective EVAR without adjunctive procedures. The upper quartile (≥3 days) was used to define protracted LOS. Preoperative risk factors with significant association (P < 0.2) were used to develop a logistic regression model for protracted postoperative LOS., Results: There were 21,769 patients that underwent elective EVAR with a median LOS of 2 days. The strongest independent preoperative predictors of LOS were chronic renal insufficiency (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.2), admission from a facility (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 2.2-3.2), dependent functional status (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.1), recent weight loss (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.7-2.9), the American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.6-2.3), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4-2.4), female gender (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.6-1.9), non-Caucasian race (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5-1.9), and dyspnea at rest (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0). Patients with a protracted postoperative LOS were more likely to require discharge to a facility (21.8% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (5.3% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Preoperative demographics and comorbidities represent significant risk factors for prolonged LOS after elective EVAR. These findings provide an important evidence basis for ongoing efforts to reduce health care spending by prospectively identifying high-risk patients. Preoperative targeting of these patients through multidisciplinary efforts may reduce costs and improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Poor nutritional status has been associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in general surgery patients; however, outcomes in vascular surgery patients are unclear. Our goal was to determine the effect of poor nutritional status on perioperative morbidity and mortality after lower extremity bypass (LEB)., Methods: The 2005-2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was analyzed to determine associated complications, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions for patients with hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <3.5 g/dL and <2.8 g/dL) undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess associated risk factors while adjusting for possible confounders., Results: There were 5,110 LEB identified with an albumin level recorded. There were 2,327 (45.5%) patients with a low preoperative albumin. Patients with a low albumin were more likely to have diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, renal failure, dialysis dependence, hypertension, history of transient ischemic attack or stroke, steroid use, impaired functional status, dyspnea at rest, anemia, prior operations within 30 days, preoperative wounds or infections, and a tibial target (P < 0.05). Multivariable analyses showed that low albumin was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.3-2.6, P = 0.001), return to the operating room (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6, P < 0.001), and increased LOS (MR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2, P < 0.001). When compared with patients with normal albumin, patients with more severe hypoalbuminemia, less than 2.8 g/dL, showed further increased risk of mortality (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.6-3.8), return to the operating room (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-2.0), and prolonged LOS (MR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3)., Conclusions: Poor preoperative hypoalbuminemia is associated with morbidity and mortality after infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia. Evaluation and optimization of nutritional status should be performed preoperatively in this high risk population., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have a high 1 year failure rate leading to a need for secondary procedures. We set out to create a predictive model of early failure in patients undergoing first-time AVF creation, to identify failure-associated factors and stratify initial failure risk., Methods: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) (2010-2014) was queried to identify patients undergoing first-time AVF creation. Patients with early (within 3 months postoperation) AVF failure (EF) or no failure (NF) were compared, failure being defined as any AVF that could not be used for dialysis. A multivariate logistic regression predictive model of EF based on perioperative clinical variables was created. Backward elimination with alpha level of 0.2 was used to create a parsimonious model., Results: We identified 376 first-time AVF patients with follow-up data available in VSGNE. EF rate was 17.5%. Patients in the EF group had lower rates of hypertension (80.3% vs. 93.2%, P = 0.003) and diabetes (47.0% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.039). EF patients were also more likely to have radial artery inflow (57.6% vs. 38.4%, P = 0.011) and have forearm cephalic vein outflow (57.6% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.008). Additionally, the EF group was noted to have significantly smaller mean diameters of target artery (3.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.1, P = 0.002) and vein (3.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that hypertension, diabetes, and vein larger than 3 mm were protective of EF (P < 0.05). The discriminating ability of this model was good (C-statistic = 0.731) and the model fits the data well (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.149). β-estimates of significant factors were used to create a point system and assign probabilities of EF., Conclusions: We developed a simple model that robustly predicts first-time AVF EF and suggests that anatomical and clinical factors directly affect early AVF outcomes. The risk score has the potential to be used in clinical settings to stratify risk and make informed follow-up plans for AVF patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Iliac conduit or direct iliac access (ICDA) can be used when anatomy is unfavorable for femoral access during abdominal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The impact of this approach has not been adequately addressed. The objective of this study was to analyze perioperative outcomes of patients requiring use of ICDAs for EVAR., Methods: Patients undergoing EVAR with and without ICDA were identified in the 2005-2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were assessed by crude comparison of matched groups and multivariate analyses., Results: Of 15,082 patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR 147 (1%) required ICDA. The ICDA group had a higher proportion of females (25.9% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.017), peripheral vascular disease (12.9% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.001), and patients with a history of dyspnea (31.3% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.024). There was no difference in age (74.5 ± 8.4 conduit vs. 73.5 ± 8.5). On multivariate analysis, the ICDA cohort had a higher rate of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-5.4; P = 0.004) and an increase in other major complications including cardiac arrest and/or myocardial infarction (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.3; P = 0.007), pulmonary complications (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9; P = 0.013), and postoperative length of stay (means ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P = 0.001). There was a trend toward increased bleeding complications with ICDA. Matched analyses of comorbidities revealed that patients requiring ICDA had higher perioperative mortality (6.8% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.008), cardiac (4.8% vs. 1%, P = 0.004), pulmonary (8.8% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.006), and bleeding complications (10.2% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.016)., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the use of ICDA during EVAR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In situations where anatomy mandates the use of iliac conduits or access for EVAR, surgeons should consider this increased risk. Open repair or the use of lower profile devices, if possible, should be considered as options for these patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)