Search

Background: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of the BAlloon Inducted re-Lamination and false lUmen Thrombosis (BAILOUT) as a simple technique to address the retrograde false lumen (FL) perfusion and subsequent aneurysmatic degeneration of the thoracic aorta due to a stent-graft crimped in a small true lumen in chronic Type B dissections., Methods: An observational, retrospective, single-center study analyzing a nonconsecutive cohort of 8 patients affected by chronic type B aortic dissections already treated with thoracic endovascular repair and with an FL lumen backflow corrected with BAILOUT between 2006 and 2020. After a standard distal extension of the previously implanted graft, the distal end of the graft area was ballooned to completely rupture the dissection lamella to relaminate the aorta hindering the FL backflow. Computed tomography was routinely performed within the first postoperative week before discharge and then at 3 months, at 6 months, and yearly thereafter. The technical and clinical success rates were analyzed. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of the technique, secondary ones included FL thrombosis evaluation, and total aortic diameter analysis at the above-defined levels during the follow-up. Safety was defined if clinical success was reached. Feasibility was intended as technical success obtention., Results: The technical and clinical success achieved was 100% with the complete interruption of FL backflow stating the safety and feasibility of the BAILOUT technique. No early procedure reinterventions were recorded and during a median follow-up of 62.5 months [interquartile range 43.2-94.1], only 1 death unrelated to the procedure was recorded. Freedom from aortic-related adverse events at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 5, and 7 years was 87.5%, 62.5%, 62.5%, 62.5%, and 62.5%, respectively. During the follow-up, no one increment of the diameter of the thoracic aorta was documented and all the patients at 3 years of computed tomography angiography showed a complete FL thrombosis., Conclusions: The BAILOUT technique demonstrates to be safe and feasible in this small cohort of patients as a simple and quick way to overcome the issue of FL backflow in chronic type B dissection. Small cohort and retrospective designs were limitations of the study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions requires revascularization of epiaortic vessels in case of coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgical bypass versus endovascular reconstruction with a chimney graft., Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter register between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed. A total of 127 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: thoracic endovascular aortic repair + surgical debranching (n = 72) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair + chimney stenting (n = 55). The main end points were major neurologic sequelae and type IA endoleak. Propensity score matching was performed to analyse baseline variables related to these outcomes., Results: The mean follow-up was 35.6 months for the debranching group and 34.1 for the chimney group (P = 0.65). The incidence of stroke was higher in the chimney group although not statistically significant (7.3% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.46); for both groups, a wide angle between the ostium of the target vessel and the aorta and landing in Ishimaru Zone 0 was found to be the main predictors for major neurologic sequelae (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively). During follow-up, 9 (12.5%) type IA endoleaks occurred in the debranching group and 12 (21.8%) in the chimney group (P = 0.14). Aortic diameter larger than 66 mm and arch angle >46° had a strong association with proximal endoleak incidence (P = 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debranching showed better results than chimney stenting in terms of major neurologic events incidence and type IA endoleak, although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to establish the indications for these procedures., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To describe a bailout technique to advance and precisely deploy thoracic endograft in the ascending aorta in case of difficulty crossing the aortic arch., Case Reports: A 73-year-old man presented with a large ruptured aneurysms in the descending aorta. During the TEVAR, stent-graft passage through the aortic arch was impossible due to the severe tortuosity of the aorta. The problem has been resolved using the sheath-anchoring rail guidewire (SARG) technique., Results: Through an axillary access, a snare was used to capture the stiff wire from the femoral access. A sheath was advanced over the stiff wire to the ascending aorta and placed there. By exploiting the grip of the sheath on the stiff in the ascending aorta, it was possible to handle the tension, move the delivery system through the arch and carefully deploy the graft., Conclusion: The SARG is a simple and quick learning technique which can be useful for Physicians dealing with complex aortic arch anatomy., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The aim of this study is to compare early and late results of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE-Gore TAG®, group A) mesh structured endograft versus a Dacron one (Relay Plus® Bolton, group B) in thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR)., Methods: A prospective database was used to extract information from anonymous patients who underwent TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs) between February 2005 and February 2019 at 3 referral university hospitals. Cases treated by means of ePTFE endograft (Gore TAG, group A) and Dacron graft (Relay Plus Bolton, group B) in elective and urgent settings were included. Early and late outcomes were compared., Results: A total of 129 consecutive patients were included (115 men and 14 women). ePTFE-Gore TAG® and Dacron-Relay Plus® Bolton were used in 56 (43.4%) and 73 (56.5%) patients, respectively. Preoperative characteristics of patients were similar. Technical success was 100%. Urgent procedures were 22.4%. Mean aortic coverage and partial debranching were 217.5 ± 91.3 and 37.2%, respectively. Early mortality and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) were 8.5% and 2.3%, respectively, without differences between the 2 groups. Early reintervention was required in 5.4% (group A) and 11% (group B), P = 0.29. Median follow-up was 32 months (interquartile range 12-55 months, range 1-156 months), similar between the 2 groups. Type I endoleak (EL), type II EL, and type III EL were observed in 16.3%, 10.9%, and 3.1% of cases, respectively, without significant differences between the groups. The rate of sac shrinkage was 28.6% in group A vs. 39.7% in group B (P = 0.19). Freedom from reintervention in group A versus group B at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 94.0% vs. 97.1%, 94.0% vs. 95.5%, 90.8% vs. 86.9%, and 81.1% vs. 80.4%, respectively (log-rank 0.35, Breslow 0.54). Rate of survival at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 96.0% vs. 94.2%, 89.3% vs. 86.8%, 76.5% vs. 77.5%, and 63.3% vs. 64.2%, respectively (log-rank 0.30, Breslow 0.57)., Conclusions: ePTFE-Gore TAG and Dacron-Relay Plus Bolton in DTAA presented similar early and late results in terms of mortality, SCI, EL, and TEVAR-related reinterventions. Effectiveness of TEVAR procedure was confirmed by the high rate of sac shrinkage and it was not influenced by endograft fabric., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)