Search

Background: Significant practice variability exists regarding the management of intermittent claudication (IC) across anatomic segments. We sought to answer the question of whether the safety, efficacy, and durability outcomes of an endovascular approach with or without common femoral endarterectomy for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) justify a surgical approach in patients presenting with IC., Methods: A retrospective single-center review of all patients who were treated using an endovascular approach for AIOD with or without common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE) from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. The review was limited to those with symptoms of IC. Patient- and limb-level preoperative presentations were reviewed. The outcomes were postoperative complications and patency rates in addition to freedom from re-intervention. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare patients who underwent endovascular and hybrid procedures., Results: A total of 245 limbs in 180 consecutive patients were analyzed. The mean age was 65 years, and 61% were males. Of 176 patients, 101 (57%) had trans-atlantic inter-society consensus (TASC) class D and 18 (10%) had class C. Eleven limbs (7.4%) had access site complications, 12 (7.9%) had surgical wound complications, and below-the-knee amputation was observed in 2 limbs (0.82%) (2 patients). Two (1.0%) patients had perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), 1 (0.5%) stroke, 1 (0.5%) AKI that progressed to dialysis, and no 30-day mortality. Rutherford's classification was improved during the follow-up period. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year primary patency rates were 94%, 77%, and 58%; primary-assisted patency rates were 98%, 91%, and 79%, respectively; and secondary patency rates were 100% for all follow-up periods. Patients who had concurrent CFE were likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and anatomically more diffuse disease. No significant differences in patency or reintervention-free survival were observed, though event rates were low in both outcomes and trended toward a protective effect with CFE., Conclusions: Endovascular management for complex AIOD with or without CFE for IC patients is safe, effective, and durable. These results justify an active, patient-centered approach for this advanced anatomic disease pattern. The morbidity of a hybrid approach in the CFE subset is low, and treatment vessel patency is excellent. The presence of anatomically advanced AIOD is not prohibitive for the treatment of patients with IC; however, careful patient selection is essential., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic modality to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) for the management of patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, certain issues regarding the indications and contraindications of TCAR remain unanswered or unresolved. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to attempt to provide some guidance on these topics., Methods: A 3-round Delphi consensus process was performed, including 29 experts. The aim of round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions of the participants. Round 2 was carried out after the results from the literature on each topic were provided to the participants. During round 3, the participants had the opportunity to finalize their vote., Results: Most participants agreed that TCAR can or can probably or possibly be performed within 14 days of a cerebrovascular event, but it is best to avoid it in the first 48 hr. It was felt that TCAR cannot or should not replace TFCAS or CEA, as each procedure has specific indications and contraindications. Symptomatic patients >80 years should probably be treated with TCAR rather than with TFCAS. TCAR can or can probably be used for the treatment of restenosis following CEA or TFCAS. Finally, there is a need for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide better evidence for the unresolved issues., Conclusions: This Delphi consensus document attempted to assist the decision-making of physicians or interventionalists or vascular surgeons involved in the management of carotid stenosis patients. Furthermore, areas requiring additional research were identified. Future studies and RCTs should provide more evidence to address the unanswered questions regarding TCAR., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Global Iliac Branch Study (NCT05607277) is an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of anatomic predictors of adverse iliac events (AIEs) in aortoiliac aneurysms treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs)., Methods: Patients with pre-IBD and post-IBD computed tomography imaging were included. We measured arterial diameters, stenosis, calcification, bifurcation angles, and tortuosity indices using a standardized, validated protocol. A composite of ipsilateral AIE was defined, a priori, as occlusion, type I or III endoleak, device constriction, or clinical event requiring reintervention. Paired t-test compared tortuosity indices and splay angles pretreatment and post-treatment for all IBDs and by device material (stainless steel and nitinol). Two-sample t-test compared anatomical changes from pretreatment to post-treatment by device material. Logistic regression assessed associations between AIE and anatomic measurements. Analysis was performed by IBD., Results: We analyzed 297 patients (286 males, 11 females) with 331 IBDs (227 stainless steel, 104 nitinol). Median clinical follow-up was 3.8 years. Iliac anatomy was significantly straightened with all IBD treatment, though stainless steel IBDs had a greater reduction in total iliac artery tortuosity index and aortic splay angle compared to nitinol IBDs (absolute reduction -0.20 [-0.22 to -0.18] vs. -0.09 [-0.12 to -0.06], P < 0.0001 and -19.6° [-22.4° to -16.9°] vs. -11.2° [-15.3° to -7.0°], P = 0.001, respectively). There were 54 AIEs in 44 IBDs in 42 patients (AIE in 13.3% of IBD systems), requiring 35 reinterventions (median time to event 41 days; median time to reintervention 153 days). There were 18 endoleaks, 29 occlusions, and 5 device constrictions. There were no strong associations between anatomic measurements and AIE overall, though internal iliac diameter was inversely associated with AIE in nitinol devices (n AIE, nitinol  = 8)., Conclusions: Purpose-built IBDs effectively treat aortoiliac disease, including that with tortuous anatomy, with a high patency rate (91.5%) and low reintervention rate (9.1%) at 4 years. Anatomic predictors of AIE are limited., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This review examines current evidence regarding management of patients with both coronary and carotid artery disease. It highlights the elevated stroke risk after surgery for this cohort and scrutinizes approaches to minimize this risk. Various revascularization methods are outlined, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS), and staged versus simultaneous surgical approaches. The importance of judiciously screening coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) candidates for carotid stenosis is emphasized, suggesting risk factor-based targeted screening is noninferior to indiscriminate screening. Efficacy comparisons are made between revascularization strategies such as staged versus synchronous CEA/CABG, CAS, and hybrid techniques. Controversies surrounding necessity and optimal timing of carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients are addressed, indicating a need for rigorous randomized controlled trials to establish definitive treatment algorithms., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complex open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often necessitates revascularization of renal arteries by either renal artery reimplantation or bypass. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and short term outcomes between these 2 strategies of renal artery revascularization., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent open AAA repair from 2004 to 2020 at our own institution. Patients who underwent elective suprarenal, juxtarenal, or type 4 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and a retrospectively maintained database of AAA patients. Patients who had symptomatic aneurysm or significant renal artery stenosis before AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative conditions, renal function, bypass patency, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared., Results: One hundred and forty-three patients underwent either renal artery reimplantation (n = 86) or bypass (n = 57) during this time period. The mean age was 69.7 years and 76.2% of the patients were male. Median preoperative creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL for the renal bypass group versus 1.06 mg/dL for reimplantation (P = 0.088). Both groups had similar median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of >60 mL/min (P = 0.13). Bypass and reimplantation groups had similar perioperative complications including acute kidney injury (51.8% vs. 49.4% P = 0.78), inpatient dialysis (3.6% vs. 1.2% P = 0.56), myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 2.4% P = 0.99), and death (3.5% vs. 4.7% P = 0.99), respectively. During the 30-day follow-up period, renal artery stenosis was identified in 9.8% of bypasses and 6.7% of reimplantations (P = 0.71). Six point one percent of patients in the bypass group had renal failure requiring dialysis (both acute and permanent) compared to 1.3% in reimplantation group (P = 0.3). For those who had 1-year follow-up, the reimplantation group had higher new incidence of renal artery stenosis compared to bypass group (6 vs. 0 P = 0.16)., Conclusions: Given that there is no significant difference in outcomes between renal artery reimplantation and bypass within 30 days or at 1-year follow-up, both bypass and reimplantation are acceptable means for renal artery revascularization during elective AAA repair., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Acute type B aortic dissections (TBADs) can become complicated at any time point, necessitating surgical repair. We sought to investigate the effect of interhospital transfer on the development of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissection (dcTBAD)., Methods: All patients who presented with acute TBAD to a tertiary aortic center from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients were divided into initially complicated type B aortic dissection (icTBAD) (0-24 hours from symptom onset), dcTBAD (25 hours to 14 days), and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (ucTBAD) groups. Criteria for complicated dissection were aortic rupture, malperfusion, or rapid aortic growth. Demographics, patient history, the timing of presentation, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups., Results: Of 120 acute TBADs included, 27 (22%) were initially complicated (aortic rupture, n = 9; malperfusion, n = 18). Twenty-one (18%) developed delayed complications (aortic rupture, n = 3; malperfusion, n = 14; rapid growth, n = 4) at a median of 7.0 [4.0, 9.0] days from symptom onset. Seventy-two (60%) remained uncomplicated. Overall, 111 (93%) presented as transfers from outside hospitals (icTBAD, n = 25; dcTBAD, n = 21; ucTBAD, n = 65). Of those, dcTBADs were more likely to have a prolonged delay between presentation to the outside hospital and referral to the tertiary center compared to ucTBADs (median = 1.00 [0.0, 5.0] days delayed vs. 0.00 [0.0, 0.0] days delayed; P < 0.001). Initially uncomplicated patients referred for transfer ≥24 hours from presentation went on to develop dcTBAD more often than those transferred in <24 hours (73% vs 13%; P < 0.001). Of dcTBADs, 38% had no high-risk features on initial imaging. Patients with dcTBAD had significantly longer length of stay (median = 12 vs 7 days; P = 0.006). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in dcTBADs than ucTBADs (9.5% vs 0%; P = 0.047). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between dcTBADs and icTBADs (9.5% vs. 11%; P > 0.05)., Conclusions: The incidence and consequence of dcTBADsare not insignificant. Late referral and transfer to a tertiary aortic center (≥24 hours from initial presentation) was associated with dcTBADsrequiring surgical intervention. The development of dcTBADwas associated with increased length of stay and increased in-hospital mortality., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiovascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period after major vascular surgery. Depending on the study population, up to 25% of patients have troponin elevation after noncardiac surgery, yet many do not meet the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Although outcomes of routine troponin elevation in patients undergoing mixed major vascular surgery have been evaluated, this has not been studied exclusively in elective, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAA), especially regarding perioperative and overall mortality., Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of routine troponin surveillance for consecutive, oAAA from 2014 to 2019. A total of 319 patients were identified and analyzed for management patterns and interventions. The cohort was stratified into groups for comparison based on those in whom troponin was routinely checked (RC) as part of a care strategy during the study period, not routinely checked (NRC), elevated troponin (ET) >0.001 ng/mL, and not elevated. The median follow-up was 21.5 ± 23.8 months. Groups were compared on demographic data, cardiac comorbidities, 30-day and 3-year outcomes for MI and death using two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests when appropriate., Results: Troponin was measured in 83.7% (267/319) of patients who underwent elective oAAA repair. Routine troponin checks were obtained in 79.9% (255/319) of patients. ET was identified in 16.5% of those with RC (42/255) and 4.7% of those with NRC (3/64). Of patients with ET, 37.8% (17/45) had a cardiology consultation, 4.4% (2/45) had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 4.4% (2/45) had another cardiac intervention. All 4 patients undergoing PCI or other cardiac intervention had received routine troponin checks. Patients with ET were older (71.2 vs. 68.6; P = 0.04), more likely to receive intraoperative blood products (P = 0.003), had longer operative times (P = 0.011), higher length of stay (9 vs. 7 days; P < 0.01), and higher 30-day MI rate (3 vs. 0; P = 0.04). They had neither longer aortic clamp times nor worse preoperative cardiac function, and the proximal clamp position during oAAA repair did not impact troponin detection. Additionally, 3-year overall mortality was increased in patients who had ET but there was not a significant difference in 3-year mortality between groups receiving routine troponin checks versus not., Conclusions: ET, identified after elective oAAA repair, was associated with a higher risk of 30-day MI and lower overall survival. However, it was not demonstrated that routine assessment of troponin levels postoperatively leads to decreased 3-year mortality in this setting., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE®) STEP 1 score reporting has been changed to a binary pass/fail format since January 26, 2022. The motives behind this change were (1) the questionable validity of using USMLE STEP 1 as a screening tool during the candidate selection process and (2) the negative impact of using standardized examination scores as an initial gatekeeping threshold for the underrepresented in medicine (URiM) candidates applying to graduate medical education programs, given their generally lower mean standardized exams scores compared to non-URiM students. The USMLE administrators justified this change as a tactic to enhance the overall educational experience for all students and to increase the representation of URiM groups. Moreover, they advised the program directors (PDs) to give more attention to other important qualities and components such as the applicant's personality traits, leadership roles and other extracurricular accomplishments, as part of a holistic evaluation strategy. At this early stage, it is unclear how this change will impact Vascular Surgery Integrated residency (VSIR) programs. Several questions are outstanding, most importantly, how VSIR PDs will evaluate applicants absent the variable which heretofore was the primary screening tool. Our previously published survey showed that VSIR PDs will move their attention to other measures such as USMLE STEP 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) and letters of recommendation during the VSIR selection process. Furthermore, more emphasis on subjective measures such as the applicant's medical school rank and extracurricular student activities is expected. Given the expected higher weight of USMLE STEP 2CK in the selection process than ever, many anticipate that medical students will dedicate more of their limited time to its preparation at the expense of both clinical and nonclinical activities. Potentially leaving less time to explore specialty pathways and to determine whether Vascular Surgeons  is the appropriate career for them. The critical juncture in the VSIR candidate evaluation paradigm presents an opportunity to thoughtfully transform the process via current (Standardized Letter of Recommendation, USMLE STEP 2CK, and clinical research) and future (Emotional Intelligence, Structure Interview and Personality Assessment) measures which constitute a framework to follow in the USMLE STEP 1 pass/fail era., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Strategies for embolization of type 2 endoleaks include translumbar, transgraft, transarterial, and transcaval approaches. The transcaval approach is limited by an inconsistent ability to access the aortic sac and the risk of puncturing and damaging the endograft or adjacent structures. We describe a novel technique for caval to aortic aneurysm sac access and report early outcomes., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transcaval embolization (TCE) at a tertiary referral center. From March 2019 to June 2021, 12 patients were identified to have undergone a novel approach to transcaval aortic sac access using a 0.014″ heavy weight tip wire guide and continuous current electrocautery to create the connection between the inferior vena cava and aortic aneurysm sac. The endoleak outflow vessel is then selectively embolized with coils or liquid embolic agents. When selective embolization was not possible, the aneurysm sac was instilled with liquid embolic agents to induce thrombosis., Results: Twelve patients underwent transcaval embolization using this method over the 3-year period. The average patient age was 79.2 ± 6.2 years and 10/12 (83.3%) were male. A high rate of comorbidities was noted in the cohort. Transcaval access into the aortic sac was achieved in all patients, while selective cannulation of outflow vessels was accomplished in 2/12 (16%) target vessels. Of these, both cases had vessels embolized using detachable coils and liquid embolic agents. Nonselective embolization was performed using liquid embolic and thrombotic agents in the other 10/12 cases. There was one perioperative complication of minor bleeding (1/12, 8.3%). Two patients were observed in intensive care unit for back pain. A persistent endoleak was identified on postoperative imaging performed at 30 days in 4/12 (33.3%) patients. Sac enlargement > 5 mm following TCE was observed in 3/12 (25%) patients. Three patients underwent open conversion with endovascular aneurysm repair explant. One patient was explanted at 1 month after failure to embolize the endoleak flow channel using TCE. A second was explanted for persistent endoleak found to be a Type IIIb with aortic diameter growth > 5 mm at 15-month follow-up. The third explant was performed for aortic sac infection at 4 months postprocedure without endoleak., Conclusions: TCE is an adjunctive technique to treat endoleaks in patients who have either failed transarterial or translumbar access. An electrified 0.014″ chronic total occlusion wire technique for transcaval access to the aortic sac for endoleak embolization can be successful in all cases without significant acute morbidity or mortality. The transcaval approach is still limited by ability to steer catheters and microcatheters into the outflow vessels with a resultant persistent endoleak and eventual need for explant., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) surveillance intervals remain controversial and difficult to standardize. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines lack quality evidence. The objective of this study is to examine patients followed in a high volume non-invasive vascular laboratory, determine if the current guidelines are fitting in clinical practice, and attempt to further identify risk factors for accelerated aneurysm growth., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent at least two ultrasounds for AAA in the vascular laboratory during 2008 -2018 with baseline diameter less than 5.0 cm was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. Groups were then created for comparison using the size criteria according to SVS guidelines. In addition, we compared overall growth rates specifically evaluating rapid growth (rate of at least 1.0 cm/year and size change of at least 0.5 cm from previous imaging), expected growth (any growth below 1.0 cm/year and of at least 0.5 cm from baseline) and no growth., Results: A total of 1581 patients (1232 male and 349 female) were identified with a total of 5945 ultrasound studies. The median age was 73 years and mean follow-up was 27.8 months. Baseline AAA size was 3.0 -3.9 cm in 986 patients and 4.0 -4.9 cm in 595 patients. The average maximum growth rate was 0.18 cm/year for AAAs 3.0 -3.9 cm and 0.36 cm/year for AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm (P <0.001). Patients with AAA 4.0 -4.9 cm at baseline were more likely to be white, male, hypertensive and have chronic kidney disease (P <0.05). 1078 patients (68.2%) demonstrated no growth over the observed time period with 342 patients (21.6%) demonstrating expected growth and 161 (10.2%) rapid growth. Male gender and baseline AAA size of 4.0 -4.9 cm were more likely to demonstrate rapid growth (P = 0.002) and eventual repair (P <0.001). Metformin use was more common in the AAA group with no growth (P <0.05). Freedom from rapid growth and repair indication at 2 years was significantly lower in those patients with baseline aneurysms 3.0 -3.9 cm (P <0.001)., Conclusion: The overall low rate of events in small AAAs supports continued surveillance every 3 years for AAAs 3.0-3.9 cm and yearly for male patients with AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm as recommended by the SVS Guidelines. Female gender may have less rapid growth than previously reported but likely merit more rigorous surveillance particularly as the AAAs approach 5.0 cm. Metformin use continues to demonstrate it may abrogate aneurysmal growth. Lastly, there is a subset of patients that exhibit more rapid growth of their small AAAs, and further study will be required to classify these patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-segment stenting of the infrarenal aorta and bilateral iliac arteries, with or without femoral endarterectomy for diffuse disease, has been adopted for treatment of severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of this reconstruction, termed aortoiliac stenting with bifurcation reconstruction (AISBR), to aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) in patients with comparable TASC II D lesions., Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients treated with ABF or AISBR for comparable TASC II D lesions between 2010 and 2018. ABF patients were included only if they were deemed anatomic candidates also for AISBR after review of preoperative imaging. Patients treated for acute limb ischemia and bypass graft infection were excluded. Statistics included Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: There were 24 ABF and 75 AISBR included in the study. The primary indication for treatment was claudication in 55 (55.6%) patients, rest pain in 28 (28.3%), and tissue loss in 16 (16.2%). Patients undergoing AISBR were more likely to be female. Femoral endarterectomies were performed in 37/75 (49.3%) AISBR and 14/24 (58.3%) ABF (P = 0.44). AISBR were performed percutaneously in 34/75 (45.1%). No AISBR required conversion to ABF. Intraoperative blood loss, procedure time and hospital length of stay (LOS) were significantly less for AISBR compared to ABF. Surgical site infections (SSI) were less common in patients undergoing AISBR (AISBR: 6/75 (8.0%) vs. ABF: 9/24 (37.5%), (P< 0.01). One AISBR and two 2 ABF developed late SSI >30 days postoperatively. The reductions in blood loss, LOS and SSI remained significant after excluding percutaneous AISBR from the analysis. Five-year primary patency was 50.8% (95% CI: 33.3, 68.4%) for AISBR and 88.1% (72.7, 100.0%) for ABF (P= 0.04). Five-year survival was 76.5% (95% CI: 63.6, 89.5) for AISBR and 100% (95% CI: 100.0, 100.0) for ABF (P = 0.07). Five-year primary assisted patency, secondary patency, freedom from reintervention and major adverse limb events did not differ significantly between groups., Conclusions: AISBR is a viable option for management of TASC II D AIOD, with lower morbidity and acceptable durability when compared to traditional ABF., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is no consensus on the method of obtaining abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameters based on computed tomographic angiography, and the reproducibility and accuracy of different methods have recently been debated due to advancements in imaging. This study compared the two most common methods based on orthogonal planes and centerline of flow to determine the discordances and accuracy amongst experiences readers., Methods: The computed tomographic angiography max diameters of 148 AAAs were measured by three experienced observers, including a vascular surgeon, a radiologist and an imaging cardiologist. Observers used two different methods with standardized protocols: multiplanar reformations based on orthogonal planes, and a software using 3D aortic reconstructions to create centerline flow lumen providing diameters based on cross sections perpendicular to this lumen. Agreements and reliability of measurement methods were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland - Altman analysis. Discordances between measurements of the methods and the original reported measurement, as well as outside hospitals were compared., Results: The average age of the cohort was 75 years and aortic diameters ranged from 3.8 to 9.6 cm. For orthogonal readings, there were agreements within 3 mm between 86% and 92% of the time, while centerline - reading agreement was between 88% and 94%, which was not statistically significant. The intra-class correlation coefficient was high between method type and between readers. Within methods, agreement was between 0.96 and 0.97, while within - reader agreement measures was between 0.96 and 0.98. In comparison to the original and the outside hospital reports, 10% ≥ of the original and 20% ≥ of the outside hospital reported measurements were discordant between the readers., Conclusion: Maximal AAA measurements can have substantial variability leading to clinical significance and change in patient management and outcomes. Based on the results, orthogonal and centerline measurement methods have equally high agreements and concordance within 3 mm and low variations at a high volume center. However, when compared to the official read reports, there is high discordance rates that can significantly alter patient outcomes. A standardized method of measurement maximum diameter can reduce variations and discordances among different methods., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The risk of hypogastric occlusion (HO) following bare-metal stent (BMS) coverage of the hypogastric origin during endovascular treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is unclear. This study sought to determine the rate and clinical significance of HO following BMS coverage during iliac stenting for complex AIOD., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing elective iliac stenting for AIOD from 2010-2018 at Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. Patients with BMS coverage of a patent hypogastric origin were included. Rate of HO were determined by review of intraoperative angiography and follow up imaging. Predictors of HO were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes were compared between those who did and did not develop HO., Results: There were 251 patients (338 limbs) with BMS coverage of the hypogastric origin during treatment of AIOD. Lesion severity was classified as TASC C/D in 249/338 (73.7%) of cases. Bilateral hypogastric coverage occurred in 93/251 (37.1%) patients. Hypogastric patency was 78.1% at 24-months following coverage. Recanalization of an ipsilateral external iliac artery (EIA) occlusion was predictive of HO (HR 3.12, 95% CI: 1.33, 7.34; P= 0.009). Increased luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin protected against HO (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88; P= 0.006). Perioperative outcomes were no different between patients with and without HO. There were no cases of gluteal necrosis, spinal cord ischemia, or pelvic organ ischemia. Four-year mortality and limb salvage were not affected by HO. HO was associated with decreased primary patency of ipsilateral iliac stents and increased risk of ipsilateral reintervention (HR 5.49; 95% CI: 1.82, 16.58; P= 0.002)., Conclusions: HO is relatively infrequent following BMS coverage during treatment of AIOD. Luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin and ipsilateral EIA occlusion are associated with occlusion. HO is well tolerated in AIOD, though it is potentially associated with increased risk iliac stent occlusion and reintervention., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Jugular venous aneurysms are uncommon and can involve the internal, external, and anterior jugular veins. These aneurysms may be congenital or acquired secondary to malignancy, inflammation, trauma or arteriovenous fistulas. Treatment strategies are not clearly defined and involve either surveillance of asymptomatic aneurysms or resection, excision, and ligation of the aneurysmal vein. In this case series, we discuss the presentation, diagnostics, treatments and outcomes in 3 patients with jugular venous aneurysms., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thrombosis of the iliac anastomosis is an important complication of open aortic aneurysm repair. We evaluated our evolving management of this complication to an endovascular approach and compared it with open revision to the common femoral artery., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing open aortic aneurysm repair from January 2009 through November 2016 at our institution were reviewed. Patients who developed iliac limb flow issues or thrombosis intraoperatively or within 48 hrs postoperatively were identified. Patients were grouped by management strategies of either 1) an endovascular approach including iliac angiography, thrombectomy if needed, and stenting or 2) open surgical revision of the iliac anastomosis with or without bypass to the common femoral artery. Demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed between groups. Primary patency and mortality were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: There were 711 patients who underwent aortoiliac aneurysm repair during the study period. 43/711 patients (6.0%) developed early perioperative iliac limb flow issues including thrombosis. Twenty-nine patients (31 limbs) were managed by an endovascular approach, and 14 patients (15 limbs) were managed by open surgical revision. The mean age of the cohort was 69 years, and 27 patients (62.8%) were male. Preoperative creatinine and diabetes frequency were higher in patients managed by an endovascular approach, although no other differences existed between preoperative comorbidities. Thrombosis or limb flow issues presented intraoperatively more commonly in the open surgical group and in the first 24 hrs postoperatively in the endovascular group. All patients had complete restoration of outflow as a result of the rescue procedure. Transfusion requirements and crystalloid replacement were significantly higher in the open surgical group. Length of stay, perioperative complications, and mortality were similar between groups. Overall, 21/31 limbs in the endovascular group and 9/15 limbs in the open surgical group had postoperative imaging, with mean follow-up of 35.0 and 55.6 months, respectively. Only one patient in the cohort lost patency: an iliofemoral jump graft that presented with late infection after postoperative wound infection, requiring staged extra-anatomic bypass and explant at 12 months. Three-year primary patency was 100% for the endovascular group and 85.7% for the surgical group by Kaplan-Meier method (P = 0.32). Endovascular management became our institution's primary salvage approach during the study. Whereas 8/15 limbs (53.3%) were managed by an endovascular approach from 2009-2011, 23/31 (74%) were managed by iliac stenting from 2012-2016., Conclusions: Endovascular management of iliac limb flow issues or thrombosis after open aneurysm repair is potentially a viable alternative to open surgical revision in the early postoperative period., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Increased use of endovascular repair for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms has fundamentally shifted the approach to ruptured aneurysms. Unfortunately, not all patients are anatomically suited for endovascular repair. It is hypothesized that, in the endovascular era, patients undergoing open repair are increasingly complex; with an unknown impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality., Material and Methods: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation database was queried for all patients undergoing open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) from 2006 to 2015. Electronic medical charts and cross-sectional imaging were retrospectively reviewed. The overall patient cohort was dichotomized between early (E-OR, 2006 to 2010) and late open repairs (L-OR, 2011 to 2015). Groups were compared based on demographic, anatomic, and perioperative variables. The primary endpoint was perioperative mortality. Secondary endpoints included overall mortality, late aneurysm-related mortality, and perioperative morbidity., Results: Of 140 patients who underwent open repair of rAAA (63, E-OR; 77, L-OR), 76% had cross-sectional imaging available for review. Aneurysm repairs in the later time period had significantly shorter infrarenal neck lengths, were more likely to have a prior aortic intervention, tended to have poor access vessels, and were more likely to require visceral or renal revascularization (each P < 0.05). While late survival did not differ between time periods, perioperative mortality (27 vs. 46%, P = 0.021) and late aneurysm-related mortality (29.9% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.031) was lower for L-OR compared with E-OR. While no anatomic variables significantly impacted survival, early time period of repair, presence of chronic kidney disease, and need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation were predictive of both perioperative and overall mortality on univariate and multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Despite the increasing anatomic and operative complexity of patients undergoing open repair of rAAAs, perioperative mortality and late aneurysm-related mortality have improved over time. These results highlight the need for both systems and expertise needed to appropriately treat this changing patient population., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients who do not undergo revascularization are at great risk for major lower extremity (LE) amputation. It has been reported that less than half (49%) of a reference Medicare amputation population had any diagnostic vascular evaluation prior to a major LE amputation. We were surprised by these data so we reviewed the preoperative evaluation in all patients who had a major LE amputation. We propose that significantly more patients will have a vascular evaluation prior to major LE amputation at a tertiary care referral center when a vascular surgeon does the amputation., Methods: A retrospective analysis of major LE amputations was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type of amputation, reason for amputation, Rutherford classification, and type of preoperative vascular examination were evaluated., Results: Over 4 years, 281 patients required major LE amputation. Above-knee amputation was performed in 39.1% of patients, whereas below-knee amputation was performed in 60.9%. Amputation was performed due to CLI in 92.9% of patients, whereas 7.1% of amputations were performed due to diabetes or other reasons. Preoperative vascular evaluation was performed in 100% of patients undergoing major LE amputation. Vascular surgeon pulse examination was most common (99.3%) followed by pulse volume recordings/ankle-brachial index (78.8%), angiography (54.8%), computed tomography angiography (29.3%), duplex ultrasonography (41.3%), and magnetic resonance angiography (0.4%). Amputations most commonly occurred due to Rutherford classification VI (63.3%) with 97.2% of patients having Rutherford IV-VI classification., Conclusions: Preoperative vascular evaluation prior to major LE amputation is achievable in the majority of patients, reported here in 100% of patients undergoing a major LE amputation. This allows us to evaluate the patient for revascularization options prior to amputation for possible limb salvage., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate central venous stenosis (CVS) etiologies and presentation within a vascular surgery practice. We evaluated endovascular treatment modalities and the patency rates of our interventions., Methods: Five-year retrospective review of endovascular intervention for CVS. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and variables were collected including etiology, indwelling device, previous upper extremity (UE) deep venous thrombosis, long-term UE indwelling device (defined as >30 days), malignancy status, hypercoagulable disorders, history of radiation or mediastinal fibrosis or masses, and anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up variables included symptoms, imaging, and anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet utilization. Living patients without recent follow-up were contacted with a telephone survey regarding current symptoms. Patency was evaluated by imaging or clinically by recurrence of signs or symptoms through January 2016., Results: A total of 61 patients underwent attempted endovascular CVS interventions from January 2007 to 2013. Forty-seven (83%) patients had successful interventions. There were 22 (36%) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The primary etiology in 79% of patients was benign CVS secondary to an indwelling device. Eighty-nine percent of the interventions were primary angioplasty (PTA). The overall primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 49%, 34%, and 24%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 97%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. There were no statistical differences in demographics or outcomes in patients treated successfully with PTA or those requiring stenting. There was no statistical difference in the patency rates between ESRD and non-ESRD patients. Previous interventions were not a predictor of loss of patency., Conclusions: Our study supported the rising trend of benign CVS predominantly secondary to indwelling devices. We demonstrated acceptable secondary patency with PTA alone. This study adds further support for a primary angioplasty strategy in treating benign CVS. The optimal endovascular treatment for benign CVS is still undefined., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate the aneurysm-related complications and device issues in patients who underwent partial endograft explantation during late conversion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to open repair., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had partially explanted endografts during late conversion between 1999 and 2012. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, subsequent operations, and aneurysm-related complications. Postoperative abdominal X-ray films and computed tomography scans were analyzed for endograft migration, component separation, device fracture, and arterial growth or aneurysm issues., Results: Between 1999 and 2012, 22 patients had late conversion after EVAR with portions of the device left in situ. Five of the partially removed devices were Zenith, 6 Talent, 5 Ancure, 3 AneuRx, 2 Excluder endografts, and 1 Cook Aorto uni-iliac (AUI) graft. There were 4 in hospital mortalities. There were no graft migrations, component separations, device fractures, new aneurysmal degeneration, or ruptures with a median follow-up of 26.5 months., Conclusions: Partial endograft removal during late conversion is not associated with complications from the remaining device pieces during follow-up. We recommend further study of this patient population., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Perioperative proximal endoleaks during endovascular aneurysm repair potentiate graft migration, aneurysm sac expansion, and stent-graft failure. Adjunctive placement of a Palmaz stent at the proximal landing zone can improve proximal seal and eliminate perigraft flow; however, the long-term sequelae associated with this maneuver are unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of Palmaz stent placement for type Ia endoleaks on delayed endoleak formation, graft migration, and aneurysm expansion., Methods: A retrospective cohort review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Between 2000 and 2005, all consecutive patients who had undergone infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair were evaluated for a type I endoleak that was treated with Palmaz stent placement. Fenestrated, juxtarenal, and investigational devices were excluded from the analysis. Postoperative and follow-up axial imaging were analyzed for the following three primary endpoints: type I endoleak formation, stent-graft migration, and aneurysm sac expansion. In addition, a paired analysis was performed comparing suprarenal aortic diameters, infrarenal aortic neck diameters, aortic neck lengths, and proximal seal zones., Results: In all, 36 consecutive patients were identified with intraoperative type I endoleaks that were treated with Palmaz stenting. Five patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms died before discharge; the remaining 31 patients comprised the cohort for analysis. During a median follow-up period of 53 months (interquartile range: 14-91 months), no type I endoleak developed after Palmaz stent placement. Despite patients experiencing shortening of aortic neck length (26%) and loss of the proximal seal zone (35%), no stent-graft migration was seen in this population. Continued aortic degeneration accounted for proximal seal zone loss. At a distance 15 mm below the lowest renal artery, the mean aortic diameter increased by 3.2 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.4-6, p < 0.5), and 63% of patients demonstrated an increase of >10%. Mean aortic sac regression was 5.8 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.5-11.0, p < 0.05). Overall, at the final follow-up evaluation, aortic sac regression was found to have occurred in 55% of patients, aortic sac increased up to 10% in 20% of the patients, and by more than 10% in 25% of the patients., Conclusions: Proximal neck reinforcement with a Palmaz stent serves as an effective endovascular adjunct to treat intraoperative type I endoleaks, and has a very high technical success rate. Most importantly, it has a clinical effect on delayed type I endoleak formation and stent-graft migration., (Copyright © 2011 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. All rights reserved.)

To determine the reason for differing shunt rates based on electroencephalographic (EEG) and neurologic changes during general and regional anesthetic, respectively, we compared simultaneous EEG tracings and neurologic status in 135 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under cervical block over a 30-month period. The decision to shunt in these patients was made on the basis of neurologic changes only irrespective of EEG findings. This group was then compared to the 288 patients undergoing CEA under general anesthetic with EEG monitoring over the same period. EEG changes occurred in 7.4% of awake patients and 15.3% of asleep patients (p < 0.03). The rates of ipsilateral hemispheric changes were similar, but no awake patient manifested global EEG changes with clamping while 3.5% of patients under general anesthesia did (p < 0.04). Global, but not hemispheric, changes were correlated with systolic blood pressure variability during clamping. This implies that global EEG changes in anesthetized patients may be the result of the anesthetic technique itself, and that cervical block may in fact be cerebroprotective.

To determine whether external beam irradiation delivered immediately after graft implantation can inhibit anastomotic intimal hyperplasia (IH) 1 month following polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass in a sheep carotid artery model, 23 sheep underwent bilateral bypass of the ligated common carotid artery with 8-mm PTFE immediately followed by a single dose of irradiation (15, 21, or 30 Gy) to one side. The 15 animals with bilaterally patent grafts were euthanized at 1 month and graft-arterial anastomoses harvested. Using computer-aided image analysis, IH areas and thicknesses were measured. Graft patency in this model was 83% at 1 month and did not differ according to treatment administered. In the control animals, IH was greatest at mid-anastomosis, but minimal within the native vessel. All three radiation doses markedly inhibited mid-anastomotic IH area and thickness. At the proximal anastomosis, 30 Gy reduced the IH area 20-fold, from 2.06 to 0.14 mm2 (p < 0.0001 by ANOVA), and IH thickness 70-fold, from 29.0 to 0.4 micron (p < 0.0002); similar effects were seen at the distal anastomosis. No adverse effects of radiation treatment were observed. External beam irradiation in doses of 15 to 30 Gy delivered in a single fraction immediately after operation markedly inhibits development of intimal hyperplasia 1 month following end-to-side anastomosis with PTFE in sheep.

To overcome constraints imposed by iliac artery anatomy, the anatomic inclusion criteria for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair can be extended by means of intentional coil occlusion of one or both internal iliac arteries and extension of the distal limb of the graft into an external iliac artery. We reviewed our experience with this intervention to determine the safety and efficacy of this approach to aneurysm repair. Over a 30-month period, 84 patients underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; 23 underwent intentional unilateral (22) or bilateral (1) internal iliac artery occlusion. Morbidity, mortality, and long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated in these 23 patients. Patients were specifically questioned about exercise-induced buttock and extremity symptoms. Our results showed that intentional internal iliac artery embolization to allow endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is accompanied by significant morbidity and should be approached with caution.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that unexpected alcohol withdrawal-like syndrome (AWLS) is more common following aortic, but not other, vascular or nonvascular procedures. All patients undergoing open aortic surgery at our institution in 1997 who survived at least 48 hr were identified, as were those undergoing carotid endarterectomy, infrainguinal bypass, and total colectomy. AWLS was defined as prolonged confusion or agitation and response to conventional treatment for withdrawal, providing that all other sources had been ruled out or a significant history was present. Our results show that, for unknown reasons, AWLS is more common after aortic surgery than after other vascular and high-stress, nonaortic intraabdominal procedures at our institution, and is associated with increased length of stay and morbidity. Because prophylaxis may improve outcome, better efforts to identify patients at risk are required.