Search

BACKGROUND Adequate microcirculatory perfusion is essential for the provision of oxygen to the liver following transplantation. Data from the Oxygen Persufflation in Liver Transplantation (OPAL) study (ISRCTN00167887) were analyzed from liver transplants performed at a single center to determine the role of factors affecting the hepatic microcirculation and early allograft dysfunction (EAD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective data from 116 patients from the Oxygen Persufflation as Adjunction in Liver Transplantation (OPAL) study who underwent liver transplantation at a single center were analyzed. Oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SO₂), relative capillary hemoglobin concentration (rHb), relative tissue blood flow (rBF) using laser Doppler flow measurements, and the Oxygen-to-See (O2C) spectrometry were measured and with post-transplant allograft function were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression statistics. RESULTS Livers donors had a median donor risk index of 1.8. Most liver transplant recipients were men (60.3%), with a median age of 54 years (IQR, 23-68 years). Mean post-transplant 3-month survival was 90.5%. The EAD rate was 22.4%, the median SO₂ was 78% (IQR, 29.5-95.8%), the median rHb was 55.6 AU (IQR, 16.8-74.8 AU), and the median rBF was 110.1 AU (IQR, 35.8-406.8 AU). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tissue SO₂ (p=0.01), body mass index (BMI) of the transplant recipient (p=0.002), serum alanine transaminase (ALT) of the donor (p=0.02), and portal blood flow (p=0.01) were predictive factors for EAD. CONCLUSIONS Non-invasive investigations of the liver microcirculation and hemoglobin oxygenation were shown to be predictive factors for EAD following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND Germany has the highest rate of patients dying or becoming unfit for transplant while waitlisted within the Eurotransplant region. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to analyze mortality as well as risk factors for mortality of candidates listed for liver transplantation at our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 01/2011 and 12/2013, 481 adult patients were listed for primary liver transplantation (LT) at a single German center. Clinical and laboratory parameters were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of all liver transplant waitlist registrants (52.4 years, 60.1% male) was 16.9 (±10.2) at time of listing, with 10% of the listed patients having a MELD score of >32. After waitlisting, 133 (27.7%) candidates died within the follow-up period. Three-month-survival after listing for transplantation was 89% for patients ultimately receiving LT vs. 71.2% that did not receive LT (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified clinical parameters such as ICU treatment, preceding abdominal surgery, variceal bleeding, and ascites, as well as hydropic decompensation, as independent risk factors for waitlist mortality. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of independent risk factors of mortality within the MELD-based allocation system potentially improves assessment of individual urgency and might improve utilization of available organs.

Background: Infections are a major cause for morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. So far there has been no study systematically investigating the correlation between the MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) scoring system and complications caused by infections. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of the pretransplant MELD score on incidence and mortality of pneumonia and septicemia in liver transplant recipients., Material and Methods: The clinical courses of 201 liver transplant recipients between 12/2006 and 3/2009 were recorded and analyzed on the basis of chart review. Patients were stratified into three groups (pretransplant MELD score: group I 6-20, group II ≥ 21-30, group III ≥ 31-40) and compared in terms of incidence of infection and survival., Results: The mean pretransplant MELD score was 22 ± 12. There were 81 patients in group I, 65 patients in group II, and 55 patients in group III. There was no difference in incidence of infections between the MELD groups. However, septicemia-associated mortality was significantly higher in group III., Conclusions: A high MELD score is not associated with higher incidence of infections but it is associated with a significantly higher mortality in the case of septicemia. Prevention of infections is of utmost importance, especially in liver transplant recipients with high MELD scores.

Background: Miscellaneous clinical classifications of liver function after liver transplantation are rested upon elevation of transaminases which represent damaging of hepatocytes and with it of the liver., Case Report: We report the case of a 35-year-old man suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The patient underwent liver transplantation and developed an extreme peak of transaminases due to prolonged cold ischemia time and additional extended donor criteria. On the first postoperative day the laboratory results showed peak transaminases as follows: AST 17577 U/l and ALT 9884 U/l. Frequent ultrasound revealed no signs of vascular complications. In spite of the dramatically elevated transaminases the liver showed a good primary function and the patient was cardiopulmonary stable. The entire postoperative course was uneventful. We discharged the patient after three weeks in a very good general state of health, with normal laboratory values., Conclusions: Exclusive extreme elevation of transaminases after liver transplantation combined with adequate liver synthesis does not always require re-transplantation, if situation of the patient is stable. Nevertheless re-transplantation should be reconsidered in any case of clinical deterioration of the patient.