Search

Background: Undiagnosed glycometabolic dysfunction is prominent amongst nondiabetic cardiac surgical patients, whereas perioperative dysglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes. This study assessed whether the preoperative level of insulin resistance predicts the degree of perioperative dysglycemia in nondiabetic, normoglycemic cardiac surgical patients. Methods: Twenty-two nondiabetic patients awaiting cardiac operations were assessed for metabolic parameters and whole-body insulin resistance (mean glucose infusion [GINF] rate) using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Intraoperative and postoperative glucose levels and treatment requirements were analyzed. Linear regression analysis was used to find predictors of baseline, peak intraoperative, and mean postoperative fasting blood glucose (FBG). Results: The mean GINF recorded in nondiabetic, normoglycemic patients was 3.5 ± 1.4 mg/kg/min. The mean peak intraoperative and mean postoperative FBG concentrations were 154.9 ± 34.2 mg/dL (range, 108.1 to 227.0 mg/dL) and 120.7 ± 16.2 mg/dL (range, 100.9 to 154.9 mg/dL), respectively. The GINF correlated inversely with mean peak intraoperative (r = −0.7, p = 0.02) and mean postoperative FBG (r = −0.8, p = 0.01). The GINF did not correlate with preoperative FBG levels (r = 0.3, p = 0.4). Preoperative FBG did not correlate with peak intraoperative (r = 0.4, p = 0.5) or mean postoperative FBG (r = 0.5, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Nondiabetic, normoglycemic cardiac surgical patients are highly insulin resistant using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Preoperative insulin resistance, not FBG, is significantly associated with the development of perioperative dysglycemia. Insulin resistance screening may be useful to identify insulin resistance preoperatively and predict the degree of perioperative dysglycemia in cardiac surgical patients but should be performed with a more appropriate and reproducible test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Established endovascular treatments for aortic dissection often result in incomplete aortic repair, potentially leading to late complications involving the distal aorta. To address the problems of incomplete true lumen reconstitution and late aneurysmal change, we report the midterm results of combined proximal endografting with distal true lumen bare-metal stenting (STABLE: Staged Total Aortic and Branch vesseL Endovascular reconstruction) in Stanford type A and B aortic dissection. Methods: Between January 2003 and January 2010, 31 patients underwent staged total aortic and branch vessel endovascular reconstruction for management of acute (type A, 13; type B, 11) and chronic (type B, 7) aortic dissection. Proximal endografting was combined with bare-metal Z stent implantation in the distal true lumen. Patients with type A dissection underwent adjunctive treatment at operation. Computed tomography angiography was performed at baseline, 1 year, and annually thereafter to assess aortic remodelling. Results: Primary technical success was 97%. Thirty-day rates of death, stroke, and permanent paraplegia/paresis were 3% (n = 1), 0%, and 0%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 57.3 months (range, 5 to 100 months). Overall survival was 60% at 100 months. Aortic-specific survival was 93%. Four patients (13%) underwent device-related reintervention. One (3%) late aortic-related death occurred. Thoracic (p = 0.64) and abdominal (p = 0.14) aortic dimensions were stable. The true lumen index increased significantly at follow-up. Conclusions: Staged total aortic and branch vessel endovascular reconstruction is a feasible ancillary endovascular technique to address the problems of distal true lumen collapse, incomplete aortic remodelling, and late aneurysm formation in aortic dissection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]