1. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly.
- Author
-
Carrier M, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, Hébert Y, Pagé P, Cartier R, Dyrda I, and Pelletier LC
- Subjects
- Actuarial Analysis, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications mortality, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Survival Rate, Aortic Valve surgery, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Prosthesis Fitting
- Abstract
Background: Valve replacement in small aortic root remains a surgical challenge. The objective of this study was to compare results of the 19-mm bioprosthesis with those of larger prostheses in the elderly., Methods: The 443 patients, 70 years of age and older, who underwent aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses were reviewed., Results: There were 93 patients with a mean age of 76+/-4 years with implantation of 19-mm prostheses and 350 patients with a mean age of 75+/-4 years with larger bioprostheses. Associated aortoplasty was performed in 10 patients (11%) with 19-mm bioprostheses and in 8 patients (2%) with larger bioprostheses (p = 0.001). There were 11 deaths (12%) within 30 days of surgery in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 22 deaths (6%) among those with larger prostheses (p = 0.1). The 7-year survival rate averaged 61%+/-7% in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 67%+/-4% in those with larger prostheses (p = 0.8). The 7-year freedom rates from all valve-related events averaged 96%+/-2% and 93%+/-2%, respectively (p = 0.6)., Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis offers excellent midterm results in the elderly.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF